Hearthpwn

Quote from Seagull0 >>

 My learned friend. Your claim is that "based on the amount of posts regarding how people are anti net decking, we should assume that the community's consensus is that it's anti net decking".

Allow me to enlighten you with a counter argument: Yes, most of the people who post at forums do support anti net decking, but. And this is a big "but", what decks are the most played in hearthstone? Don't worry, I'll make it easy for you and answer: The very same net deck's you are against.

So this raises the question: Is the community which barks loudly against net decking larger than the community who play those net decks? I'll answer that for you as well: No it is not. Therefor we can conclude that the hearthstone's community's concusses is that which is pro net decking.

Lesson complete.

So let me summarize the community's consensus,because you are not a special snowflake my dear.

1.Netdecking is fine,the fact that there are only 2 tier one decks isn't

2.The majority of community wants to have all playstyles equally viable

3.Secret pala and druid are hated because of their power level,their simplicity and because of bming playerbase(half of my games druids and paladins spam non stop before full board/combo lethal) not because of their playstyle.Not that other types of  player don't bm but this is so frequent on those two decks.

4.Respect to secret pala,hunter and druid?What why?Why you would respect anyone for chosing a deck they like to play?lol.They just choose their decks as i choose mine.Should you respect me for it?

Quote from fabisco >>

And you, the even more special snowflake is able to embody the 'communities consensus' all by itself ... Shall we start to call you 'dear leader'? or what honours do you prefer?

 

Quote from Seagull0 >>

Before you read I'd just like to clarify that I'm referring the content of this thread to a specific yet large group of people, not everyone. You should know if this IS or is not meant for you.

Over the years of using this site I've seen countless threads about self righteous people who claim that "net decking is ruining the game", that "people who play face hunter or secret pally are ruining the game or are just stupid", and countless threads of this nature. Inevitably these threads get many pro arguments to them and gain much support, but here's my opinion: anyone who ever said such things is stupid.

For the simple reason that everyone should enjoy the game based on how THEY'RE playing it, and not how others play it. "Oh, someone just played a secret paladin against me, this deck is cancer, this game is cancer, this game sucks, I hate this game, they're ruining the game for me". Just... Why? If you care about deck building and playing decks you enjoy more than winning then why do you get salty when you play against someone who chooses to play a different style of playing than yours? It's like if a team of football chooses to play one strategy then hate everyone else who's not playing the same strategy as them, and to add insult to injury, they're also being self righteous, claiming that the others' strategy is overused and "cancerous".

To everyone who complain about other people's play style (such as face decks, secret pally, etc), get off your high horse and enjoy the game from the way you play it, don't ruin your experience based on how others play it and countlessly complain about it, because then you're being a hypocrite and a baby.

And to everyone who enjoys the game playing face decks, secret pally, etc, and never complain about the mistreatment you receive from self righteous people such as those described above, and just enjoy the game from they're own perspective without calling anyone not doing the same "cancerous", I give you a cookie.

The moment you realise that digital cards get  more action than you.

#Feelsbadman :'(

Captain obvious here!

The meta is stale because there are only 2 tier 1 decks atm (pala,druid) and they are boring to play against,not because of netdecking.If they were 10+tier1 decks with intersting mechanics like handlock,malyrogue etc the game would be a blast to play even if everyone netdecked.

**Flies away**

Quote from Hanzo0712 >>

Indeed it was fun reading this again.

Omnislash_7777 comeback, we need you again !!!

Quote from Magiicguy >>

Quote from Shadire >>

Quote from Omnislash_7777 »

I think this is going to be a sleeper card like sludge belcher where everyone is going to be like "meh.." at first until a bunch of top players introduce it into constructed then it'll be one of those cards that's literally in every deck.

The large RNG factor makes it unlikely that it makes to many constructed decks. It's body is inferior to almost anything at 4 mana. It's like Ethereal Arcanist but with it's ability much less consistent. Mybe will see some niche use but will most likely end in fun decks only.

 I think this one earns the "worst forecast ever" title though. "niche use".

Quote from Omnislash_7777>>

I think this is going to be a sleeper card like sludge belcher where everyone is going to be like "meh.." at first until a bunch of top players introduce it into constructed then it'll be one of those cards that's literally in every deck.

Perfectly balanced! Kappa!

Thank god that Hemet Nesingwary is rotated out.He would be so op in your deck along with Dark Wispers.In wild that deck will be  the most broken shit ever!Mark my words.

Mal'Ganis is a threat that can be cheated through Voidcaller,that also has makes your hero complete immune(no spells pass through him) and has demon synergy.

This dude is crap,even if hoot hoot gets nerfed, there will still be silence in the game,you can buff your minions to efficiently trade with it,can't do shit against spells that aim your face and most importadly is 9 mana ( too slow vs aggro).Basically this a gloryfied Arcane Nullifier X-21

Nope, it's a plain token

https://twitter.com/PlayHearthstone/status/718500331416633345