some of these legenedaries are still playable in some decks and some of them will be playable in the future expansions.
edit:
also keep Ilidan, just in cause (if Blizzard decided to nerf Dr.Boom somehow and change the AP of Ilidan again)
1) "if you believe the tier list should be changed in anyway, PM me."
2) None of those cards have been played competitively in the last year. velen is the only exception and is only played in a t4 or t5 deck, thus only needed for one deck and not worth keeping unless you want to play that deck.
3) "Keep a bad unplayable card because blizzard might buff it" Why? you have nothing to back up that assumption. No do not keep Ilidan lol...
Played competitively means to be played consistently by pro players at high ranks and at tournaments.
Pro players played with some of the cards above (some for ladder and some for fun decks), for example:
Some of the legendary players used Confessor Paletress in their control priest deck
Gahz'rilla + Malorne for future expansions, Blizzard may "resurrect" the Beast Druid and make Malorne a playable card, same for Gahz'rilla for OTK hunter ;)
Legendaries that are too weak to see competitive play (Disenchant)
Expert
King Krush
Nozdormu
Onyxia
Gruul
Cairne Bloodhoof
Hogger
Illidan
The Beast
Captain Greenskin
King Mukla
Tinkmaster Overspark
Lorewalker Cho
Millhouse manastorm
Nat Pagle
Prophet Velen
Goblins VS Gnomes
Mekgineer Thermaplugg
Foe Reaper 4000
Sneed's Old Shredder
Flame Leviathan
Gahz'rilla
Malorne
Troggzor the Earthinator
Gazlowe
Iron Juggernaut
Trade Prince Gallywix
Bolvar Fordragon
Hemet Nesingwary
Mimiron's Head
Blingtron 3000
The Grand Tournament
Anub'arak
Aviana
Icehowl
Acidmaw
Confessor Paletress
Sktcap'n Kragg
Bolf Ramshield
The Skeleton Knight
Wilfred Fizzlebag
Fjola Lightbane
Eydis Darkbane
Dreadscale
_________________
Remember: If you would like to know what Legendary to craft, please include the decks you play and the decks you are going to play. This is necessary and someone can help you a lot easier.
0
0
0
yeah, 2x Defender of Argus are essentials in Zoo decks (in my opinion),
and since we're talking about low-minions, I would defiantly find a placement for Loatheb in that deck.
0
I just saw only 1 deck in hearthpwn that uses Wilfred Fizzlebang,
It's like the normal Handlock deck but with Wilfred Fizzlebang + Fencing Coach.
in my opinion: it's a bit slow and more independent on RNG (expensive card with bad stats and requires luck with draws).
0
Thanks DFBwin, Hanzo0712 & uWillOnTilt,
I've tried to make something with it like: use it with [card]Acidic Swamp Ooze[/card] but I think it's too much expensive and very depended on luck.
I guess, I'll just disenchant it then, cheers :)
0
Hello HearthPwners ;)
After LOE came up with the Cursed Blade:
Does Blingtron 3000 still considered as a viable card in constructed decks?
2
I love face hunters ;) but don't like it when they play it against me :P
1
So it's like the standard Demon Zoo but with 2x Mortal Coil instead of 2x Flame Imp right?
btw, grats for the legend ;)
0
Thanks Kibler / nat_hs :)
I've just replaced 1x Webspinner with x1 Owl
4
sorry, my bad ;)
0
I liked the idea of this deck (I also tried it)
Not recommended on Ladder-climbing because it's very slow, but fun to play ;)
If your opponent deals with your Dreadsteeds (Silence / Polymorph / Hex) = game over
---
edited. sorry :)
0
Hi distressqq,
I liked your deck and the description ;)
I've just did a small modification:
Chilmaw is great vs Patron / Paladin / Zoo-Warlock (and more), I've replaced Chromaggus with Chilmaw
2
Hello MrPinguinHS,
Can you explain: the purpose of "Far Sight" card?
2
Hello Lyme :)
I tested & liked your deck,
try playing against low geared but skilled players (basic cards), you will be surprised
(basic mages for example)
cheers :)
1
Hello ryshotex :)
I think Sneed & Toshley are very slow for this deck (consider adding at least Cogmaster x2)
cheers :)