• 1

    posted a message on Call of the NERF! (nerf Call of the Wild)
    Quote from Innkeeper1708 >>

    Well, I don't think this need a nerf for a while, maybe in the future

    BUT, I'm pretty sure this will happen, like a Turn 2 Doomsayer, I can be wrong, but let's see

    Everytime a class get a good 8 mana spell, it's nerfed to 10, like Pyroblast and Mind Control, maybe it will happen with Call of The Wild

    THE NERF IS COMMING!

     Mind Control and Pyroblast for 8 manas are weak in comparison.
    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Call of the NERF! (nerf Call of the Wild)
    Quote from BVanScoy1 >>
    Quote from hillandder >>
    Quote from Morpha123 >>
    Quote from BVanScoy1 >>
    Quote from Morpha123 >>
    Quote from DragonConsort >>

    If it was a warrior card, the majority here would be up in arms defending it.   

     I doubt it, lots of people hate warriors. 
     No class is blindly hated more than Hunters. 
    Hunters are not hated "blindly" though. No class is. If some people hate them, they have a reason. If hunters are hated, it's probably because of their extremely aggressive, ignore-your-minions-hit-your-face style of gameplay, which is understandably frustrating to play against. And CotW is one of the most broken cards in the game at the moment. I understand Hunters would be average without it, maybe even a little weak. But balancing classes is NOT achieved by giving them ridiculously busted cards. Blizzard should know better. 
     
    To give another example, let's go with Shamans.  Shamans are by far the most hated class right now. They are not hated blindly, however. What people hate is the same predictable, overpowered start of turn 1 trogg, turn 2 golem, turn 3 tuskarr into another totem golem, and GG. And of course Mr. 4 mana 7/7 
     I don't have anything against hunters, the class never be a problem to me and for a time I played a lot with, my problem is with this abomination OP broken and unfair CotW.
     Not brokenly OP or unfair, Hunters just counter control Warrior. You admitted that you play almost exclusively control decks which mid-range decks are suppose to counter. If you adjusted your Rogue deck you'd see a really high win percentage against Hunters. My point is that you don't get to play one archetype and cry foul (nerf) when your deck faces a counter archetype. 
     I don't care about playing vs a counter or hard match, if I playing with rogue vs shaman, with is almost impossible because the lack of neutral healing, don't concede, I take my chances and try to win, hunters always was bad matchs for warriors but become impossible because this OP card, imagine N'zoth or C'thun if was epic and cost only 8 mana? That is CotW.
    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Call of the NERF! (nerf Call of the Wild)
    Quote from Morpha123 >>
    Quote from BVanScoy1 >>
    Quote from Morpha123 >>
    Quote from DragonConsort >>

    If it was a warrior card, the majority here would be up in arms defending it.   

     I doubt it, lots of people hate warriors. 
     No class is blindly hated more than Hunters. 
    Hunters are not hated "blindly" though. No class is. If some people hate them, they have a reason. If hunters are hated, it's probably because of their extremely aggressive, ignore-your-minions-hit-your-face style of gameplay, which is understandably frustrating to play against. And CotW is one of the most broken cards in the game at the moment. I understand Hunters would be average without it, maybe even a little weak. But balancing classes is NOT achieved by giving them ridiculously busted cards. Blizzard should know better. 
     
    To give another example, let's go with Shamans.  Shamans are by far the most hated class right now. They are not hated blindly, however. What people hate is the same predictable, overpowered start of turn 1 trogg, turn 2 golem, turn 3 tuskarr into another totem golem, and GG. And of course Mr. 4 mana 7/7 
     I don't have anything against hunters, the class never be a problem to me and for a time I played a lot with, my problem is with this abomination OP broken and unfair CotW.
    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 3

    posted a message on Wild will soon be the dominating format?

    This is a free game and is possible to get any card for free, as long Blizzard keep that way I don't mind (I believe the majority of players too) the cards rotating, I actually like, the meta always shifting.

    And wild is fun enough with so much cards avaiable.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Group therapy! Need to blow off steam? Mega salty? Here is the place!
    Quote from iCyTaLonS >>
    Quote from hillandder >>
    Quote from SchruteBucks >>

    just gonna start conceding any game i dont mulligan a good curve, so as not to waste my own time.

     I concede any time I see a hunter, already know I lose because the abomination called CotW, so as not to waste my own time.
     No offense intended, but if you guys are unable to climb ranks effectively, it may have to do with reasons like this
     I reach rank 5 every season, in this one probably not because I concede for hunters (I sick of CotW) and almost 50% of matchs is him.
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Group therapy! Need to blow off steam? Mega salty? Here is the place!
    Quote from SchruteBucks >>

    just gonna start conceding any game i dont mulligan a good curve, so as not to waste my own time.

     I concede any time I see a hunter, already know I lose because the abomination called CotW, so as not to waste my own time.
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Call of the NERF! (nerf Call of the Wild)
    Quote from spiritooo >>

    dont cry, craft it. 

     The only reason to me don't dust this cheat abomination is the hope Blizzard finally realize how much OP broken this card is and do the deserved nerf.
    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Call of the NERF! (nerf Call of the Wild)
    Quote from Aravash >>
    Quote from hillandder >>

    I am so sick losing for this card I decide never play with hunter until nerf this abomination and just concede in start of the game if my opponent play with hunter, it is more than obvious this card is absolutely broken and unfair, any person abusing with this crap should shame yourself for cheating.

     Have you tried playing against hunter with a class that wasn't warrior? Paladin, for instance?
     I play with warrior, rogue and priest most of the time.
    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Call of the NERF! (nerf Call of the Wild)

    I am so sick losing for this card I decide never play with hunter until nerf this abomination and just concede in start of the game if my opponent play with hunter, it is more than obvious this card is absolutely broken and unfair, any person abusing with this crap should shame yourself for cheating.

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Execute needs to be nerfed.

    Is the only warrior card I agree about nerfing, but only after the nerf of a much more broken abomination knows as CotW.

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on There really needs to be a report function

    I like the idea for a report button but not for friend requests, I like for report users than lack of sporting spirit, like the ones don't concede lose games and leave you watching the rope animation...

    Posted in: Standard Format
  • 0

    posted a message on Control Warrior feat. Malchezaar [+Guide]

    I use a similar deck, with Malcheezar Elise lose your purpose, you don't need so much slot for fatigue, or Elise or Malchezaar.

    With Elise your deck have more reliable draw, with Malchezaar your deck have more cards, I prefer a 5/6 for 5 manas than a 3/5 for 4 manas, Malchezaar is my choice.

    I like to play with Brann + 2 Coldlight Oracle to increase the odds for the game become a fatigue match.

    Posted in: Control Warrior feat. Malchezaar [+Guide]
  • 0

    posted a message on Blizzard needs to calm down

    I disagree, for me Blizzard release a expansion/adventure every month for one reason.

    Testing new deck make the meta far more interesting than after the tests done and the decks become finished.

    In actual situation we have one month with a lot of fun and diversity and tree months with same 3 or 4 decks over and over and over again.

    Before ONIK I see only 3 decks a milion times: Midrange Hunter, Dragon Warrior and Shaman, some times a zoo and that is it, nothing else, a lot of classes completely unplayable, with new adventure I see dragon decks, priest again and people trying new decks, soon is gone until the new expansion.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on New Rogue Card - Ethereal Peddler

    You got value with this deck but the cards are inconsistence and the lack of a decent neutral healing make your opponent kill you no matter the card advantage you build during the game.

    Rogue will be a lot more playable if healbot or something like that exist in standard...

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Why is this site so SLOW?
    Quote from globalist >>

    So whatever happened to the QA testing of the changes and their supposed imminent release to live? Still cannot use the site in FF, my main browser. In Chrome it's somewhat decent.

     Chrome have support for more cores (and better security) instead one single of FF, is sad but the fox is far behind from Chrome and Edge, a slow site like this one you see the hard limitations of FF with was in past my favorite browser, and looks like the problems don't go away, not for FF and not for this site.
    Posted in: Site Feedback & Support
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.