Quote from jainaishot >>"Horrible attrocities happen in the world therefore crimes that don't affect me should go unpunished and unnoticed!"
Big brain statements in this thread by big brain users!
So if anybody harms you or your loved ones, police response should be "bruh, hunger, pandemics and genocides happen, deal with it"
Are we the police?
6
insta golden craft for me. what a card!
now if blizzard can buff academic espionage to 2 mana we'd have some fun in wild.
4
For fun I've decided to do the ReaverRyan challenge from scratch F2P, and I'm going through all the ranks with a free pally deck. I haven't yet graduated to regular ranks where wild is unlocked.
instead I'm stuck on ranks 1 to 10 of apprentice. Queue times are around 4 to 5 minutes. and I'm ONLY facing top tier meta decks that are EXPENSIVE. My "new player" free account is not competitive at all.
I've literally not faced one F2P or remotely comparable to a new player's deck. No cards that aren't brand new, competitive and meta (unlike you'd expect them to match with in the "apprentice" ranks (or even sub Diamond 5 for that matter).
I have no clue how this match making works. Not one card that's not from a top HS replay deck that someone would've needed to purchase the bundle to get.
If queue times were quick I'd kinda get it, but I'm waiting 5 minutes per game. what a joke.
I have to say if I weren't doing this for sport but brand new I'd have quit a long time ago.
2
"BOTH sides will do their best to prove their point and so the chances to get to the truth are much much higher."
You're an intelligent one. I never knew that using the court of public opinion in an uneducated assault without facts had this effect.
Because of dopes like you a lot of us lost a lot of needed escape in getting excited for new cards. But of course I'm "Bootlickus Bootlickus" as you like to call me and the others who view Hearthstone as an escape from social justice crap.
4
As if these people had any morals to begin with from which to sit on their moral perch to judge others. Blizzard needs to cancel the streamer reveals going forward. I suspect the vast majority of us want to see the cards and don't really care about a lawsuit.
If these people had any moral consistency they'd quit the game and never promote it again. Now that would be a statement. They're so quick to cancel others, so why not do your part to cancel Blizzard?
They won't. Every single one of them will be back in a week because it's the type of characters that they are. Money > than any moral compass that they have. You'll see.
1
Wanting to see the cards is not about disrespecting alleged victims of harassment. It's about a whole group of people waiting for a long time and being excited to see cards, but having that be hijacked by streamers who want to "show support" for these allegations.
None of these people will quit the game or actually try to harm Blizzard like they have to others based on unsubstantiated allegations, so it's all just fake any way.
I hope Hearthstone does it different next time and gets rid of this whole streamer reveal. It sucks that the player base is subjected to their judgments, whether true or not, it's ridiculous to hold the player base hostage for these allegations.
Prove it in court and then the legal system will take care of it. That's why we have laws so justice isn't served by vigilantes.
2
cool card but 2 stars. mid range hunter in all likelihood still won't be a thing and throwing up a 4/5 on 5, just so you can trade the subsequent turn is just too slow for any viable hunter deck that i can think of.
great design, cool card, but mid-range hunter unless it receives a ton more support won't be a thing.
1
cool card. 5 stars. easy day 1 golden craft. probably the first nerf of the set.
2
GIGATRASH!
3
wow. this is trash. not even creative.
1
I respect your viewpoint, but if it was going on for two years, this group couldn't a single reputable class action lawyer to litigate on their behalf? There are a bunch of successful ones out there that have gotten money from Google, etc. so it's a bit odd to me that this governmental department which no doubt will take the lion share of gains for itself via a fine is the only one to take it. Unless you were in the room, you know nothing more about this than me or anyone else.