• 1

    posted a message on Possible fix to ranked forever? (Also, ways to improve ranked thread.)
    Quote from EndlessAtom >>
    Quote from Drez >>

    No, you can't artificially force deck variety. It's horrible to force players to choose between using the cards they think are best, and weaker cards that'd allow them to earn more points. At that point you wouldn't be optimising your deck against the meta based on strength, you'd optimise based on some elusive weighting system, trying to not gimp your deck too much while picking cards you think others haven't. Just no.

    The objective was to decrease the use of this "cancerous" decks everyone complains about after each release. Nothing of what you said could argue this.
     Now you're just making yourself look stupid.
    "Hey guys, my idea fixes this one thing. Who cares if other things break, i fixed this one thing"
    That's not how game design works. You can't respond to complaints about your idea with that argument. I could fix aggro decks by removing aggro classes from the game. That fixes things too, and it's a lot simpler than your idea.
    Seriously, this one post makes you look like you don't give a shit about the game. You just want to force your solution to this one thing and fuck everything else.
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Possible fix to ranked forever? (Also, ways to improve ranked thread.)
    Quote from EndlessAtom >>
    Quote from gabugga >>
    Quote from EndlessAtom >>

    I kind of assumed this isn't the first time this ideal has been said, but I'm not sure why it's "idiotic". My best guess is you're just trolling. 

     You want to discourage people from playing the best decks in the RANKED play mode. Do you know what ranked means?
    Keep thinking im trolling though. Get ready to call everyone else trolls when they tell you why it's a bad idea.
    This idea mostly comes from people mad about getting rocked by the best decks over and over again in ranked play.
    What's funny is this would actually be a fun thing in a different kind of game mode, but people always recommend their suggestions for ranked without even thinking.
     I'm still curious about the responses to this topic tho. You said "again" as if it had already be debunked, do give me the link. 
     Probably not 100% the same ideas but always the same goal
    It doesn't matter how it's done. There should be no incentivizing playing things in ranked mode. The goal is to get the highest rank possible through any means necessary. If you want variety, play casual mode. If you think casual mode has too little variety play wild casual mode. If you think that has too little variety get blizzard to add a mode without gold rewards, or play arena.
    It's the competitive game mode. I don't know how I can explain this to you other then saying that. Competitive. Ranked play. I'm just going to keep repeating that until you get it.
     
     
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Possible fix to ranked forever? (Also, ways to improve ranked thread.)
    Quote from EndlessAtom >>

    I kind of assumed this isn't the first time this ideal has been said, but I'm not sure why it's "idiotic". My best guess is you're just trolling. 

     You want to discourage people from playing the best decks in the RANKED play mode. Do you know what ranked means?
    Keep thinking im trolling though. Get ready to call everyone else trolls when they tell you why it's a bad idea.
    This idea mostly comes from people mad about getting rocked by the best decks over and over again in ranked play.
    What's funny is this would actually be a fun thing in a different kind of game mode, but people always recommend their suggestions for ranked without even thinking.
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Be honest, are you a gracious loser or a sore loser? *POLL*

    I say well played at the end of every match, which according to hearthpwn is horrible BM.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 5

    posted a message on I just got roped every single turn. In casual mode. Whilst playing Priest.

    If you're getting mad in a casual game it's your own fault since you can leave at any time.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Need people to critique my deck

    I'd highly recommend white eyes over Cairne. Against aggro you'd rather have a lower cost minion with taunt, and against control you'd much rather have the 10/10 later, and always great to guarantee a taunt with Nzoth. I know you have taurens but white eyes will make a much larger impact.

    White eyes is honestly the perfect card for a control shaman deck.

    Posted in: Shaman
  • 1

    posted a message on Why doesnt Reno have a neutral REAL counter card that blocks the battlecry?

    I wonder how many locked posts you need to have before you get banned? Surely this dude has hit the limit.

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on How do you get good at deckbuilding?

    Step 1. Throw a bunch of your favorite cards together in a deck.

    Step 2. Lose hopelessly to the top tier decks

    Step 3. Complain about "broken" decks on hearthpwn because your homebrew crap is terrible. Blame blizzard that your demon priest won't work.

     

    Posted in: General Deck Building
  • 0

    posted a message on Priest, Shaman and Paladin Need Their Classic/Basic Set Reworked

    The issue with priest in the classic set is their minions. 

    They have some great stuff but their minions are so reliant on other things going on.  Lightspawn is pretty bad. Temple enforcer makes no sense when they're printing 3/4s that do the same thing. Soulpriest is ok but reliant on combo. Lightwell is useless. Cabal shadow priest is very good but very focused on the meta having those cards. Velen is a really bad classic legendary, reliant on gimmicky OTK decks. 

    Priest was built to be a minion focused class using their hero power that was forced into control because it had no good minions. That's why dragon priest is solid, you find your value that way without running those bad priest minions.

    Consider some other classes. Druid has Druid of the claw, keeper of the grove (pre-nerf) the ancients. Hunter has highmane. Mage has mana wyrm and Apprentice. So many good minions, but nothing really for priest.

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Daily missions

    Oh wow someone is unlucky in HS. Better make a post about it!

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 14

    posted a message on New Expansion Name Leaked?

    It's an expansion. God nobody pays attention here. 

    Don't you guys care that you spread misinformation to people that don't know any better? No of course you don't. They have to do the schedule like this because of how the rotation works. It will be Expansion--Adventure--Expansion every year. They can't start the year with a fucking adventure....

    Quote from Pwnmaster22 >>

    Yes next up should be an adventure !

     
    Quote from Azk29 >>
    Quote from Solitare >>

    Maybe not the next expansion. It sounds more like an Adventure I think , when you consider the 'scope' of Un'Goro. But then if they can turn Gazgetan into a expansion, then they can do the same with Un'Goro.

     well obviously the next release is an adventure, theyve always alternated expansion adventure
     

     

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on What is wrong with me ??
    Quote from 359DON >>
    Quote from gabugga >>

    here we go again. Time for people to spread misinformation about golden legendaries not having a pity timer.

    500 packs isn't a lot bro.

     U R DEFIANTLY PAY TO WIN PLAYER.. 
    thats y 500 isnt a lot for u.
     Ummm no its just not a lot of packs if we're talking about the golden pity timer.
    Let's say for instance you split packs evenly.
    There's been 5 sets, so that's 100 packs each. Nowhere near hitting the golden legendary pity timer.
    You can find videos of people buying hundreds of packs of the same set and getting golden legendaries because they actually hit the timer. 
    If you think 500 packs is a really lot then you will never hit the golden legendary pity timer anyhow, and that's what most people are going to post here. "Hey guys i opened 100 packs and no golden legendary no timer right?"
    Just confirmation bias and people being ignorant.
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on What is wrong with me ??
    Quote from dW2005 >>

    Pity timer is only for rolling a legendary. Making it golden or not probably takes another RNG roll with low enough chance to happen. 

     Wrong on many levels
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on What is wrong with me ??

    here we go again. Time for people to spread misinformation about golden legendaries not having a pity timer.

    500 packs isn't a lot bro.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Switching to Wild!
    Quote from TopdeckRNG >>

    I'm fed up with standard. Fighting the same five decks every time I queue up is incredibly boring

    Quote from TopdeckRNG >>

    Thank you for the serious answer, everybody here is so negative. :(

     Oh yah we're the negative ones.
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.