Hearthpwn

@Everyone questioning about the card art, based on my understanding, the full moon represents the transformation from human to beast.

Why is it confusing? It essentially reads "Rush. Enrage: +3 Attack".

Battlecry: Cast 'Inner Fire' on all minions in your deck. {Change their Attack to be equal to their Health [Take the Health, subtract by the Attack, then add the result to the Attack (Subtract the value in the red section on the right of the card with the value in the yellow section on the left of the card and perform addition with the obtained value off of the subtractions with the value in the yellow section)]}

Replace Baku with Justicar then I guess. Makes the deck way less consistent but hey, it's something.

Priests getting good Dragons would be way too optimistic since they've just been through the best two years of their lives, but here's to hoping.

Yeah, Nightmare Amalgam works pretty well in Murloc Pally for it's stats and curve fill. Curator wasn't really run anywhere else other than Murloc Pally tho, not to say it was a bad card.

No it can't, costs 3 more

Quote from jsager99 >>

This may as well read: "kill a Tar Creeper and summon a Magma Rager"

Quote from Trimutius >>

In priest on turn 6 you might heal it back to 5/3

You're actually starting to convince me that Spell Shaman is good. If you analyse Runespear could have been good (in those highlight reels you see), but wasn't because it hit the wrong target. So what we can learn from that is that Shaman spells are good, but Shaman spells with random targets is bad. 

This card is basically a Shiv but instead of drawing a card, you get a 4/2 body as a best case scenario, which on paper is pretty good, but realistically, isn't very practical. For this card to be really good tho, you need to be going first and this needs to remove a 1/1. 

I can see some decent synergies with existing cards so far, Animated Berserker is good,Inner Rage is great, Whirlwind is decent, and on later turns Warpath and Bladestorm is good.  The problem is that the former 3 cards are not really that strong on their own, and we don't know about Warpath for sure.  So you have to put at least 2 subpar cards in your deck (Fluffy Wasp and say, Inner Rage) in order to have a good combo that isn't directly impactful to the game or impactful at all. As of now, this overall isn't more than playable.

They won't have the ability to just win by sheer luck by turn 4. Yes this will make the deck at least 2 tier less powerful, but Shadow Essence is still a strong card.

Hard to say, if you run Baku (which you really should), you would practically start off with 30 Health and 4 Armor, and the Armor just keeps building on against most matchups, so the 4 Health will probably be wasted. This is why Health restoration is not a popular tool in general for Warrior. Great tool for the deck against aggro for sure tho, with the Restore wasted or not.

urmummurloc

Quote from Woody37 >>

You meant Sea Giant right?

@Rose1574 Mostly agree with ya, but a few corrections (IMO). Priest DK is still good against Cubelock a lot of the times since it removes Doomguards and occasionally Mountain Giants (teched for matchups against Priest). In other cases, Shadowreaper is still pretty decent as it transforms your early game survivability into a late game win condition.

Deathstalker Rexxar is not innately bad, in fact, it's innately one of the best cards in the game, but the it's in the wrong class. If Hunters could afford a more control-ly or more late game oriented deck, it would be run maybe not as much as Bloodreaver Gul'Dan, but maybe as much as Mal'furion the Pestilent. Worth mentioning that it was run in some Midrange lists back in the KFC meta. 

Scourgelord Garrosh is great in most Control Warrior decks today, Thrall, Deathseer can fit perfectly into most token/midrange decks, and the Paladin one defines OTK Pally, which is about a mid Tier 3 deck.