I get the idea of what TC is saying, and I think it would be fine (not that I think it's a great idea).
I think people are grossly overestimating how much people would actually be doing it / its effects on either side. People already play "cancer" decks. "Free wins" only really makes a big difference if the deck is winning already (if it's losing and you get free wins, it's breakeven more or less and you don't climb). Thus, if a deck was winning, people would be playing it anyways. This wouldn't really impact peoples' deck choices (people who want to win play the best meta decks they can afford anyways to improve WR). And the amount of "free wins" you get would be negligible to the number you actually play. And if the deck isn't actually good / you aren't good player, you'll end up losing more games and ranking down anyways.
1
I get the idea of what TC is saying, and I think it would be fine (not that I think it's a great idea).
I think people are grossly overestimating how much people would actually be doing it / its effects on either side. People already play "cancer" decks. "Free wins" only really makes a big difference if the deck is winning already (if it's losing and you get free wins, it's breakeven more or less and you don't climb). Thus, if a deck was winning, people would be playing it anyways. This wouldn't really impact peoples' deck choices (people who want to win play the best meta decks they can afford anyways to improve WR). And the amount of "free wins" you get would be negligible to the number you actually play. And if the deck isn't actually good / you aren't good player, you'll end up losing more games and ranking down anyways.
0
can we take the same stance with complaining about nerfs?
0
on the list: whatever deck i play
not on the list: whatever beats my deck
0
pretty slow. not sure how it would do unless its cheated out.
0
Needs support. Maybe something like:
5 mana 1/1 Battlecry: Gains +1/+1 for every imp in your deck
or
3 mana spell draw a card, draw another card if its a demon.