Hearthpwn

Quote from acelee62 »

I don't really understand the "don't play a certain class" argument. Given some legendaries are just plain bad, I still don't think it's the best idea to D/E them. I think a part of learning and enjoying the game is playing all classes and trying new things out.

Given I have a Nozdormu just sitting around. But who knows when they'll get a buff or a nerf, and unless you're really desperate for the dust, wouldn't you rather build your collection? You only get 400 dust from a D/E a regular legendary. I don't find much value in that...

Well, I don't enjoy the game when I'm playing rogue as simple as that , and I would rather try other classes' new things out

Blizzard has said multiple times that they won't buff cards unless it's completely neccessary, they'd rather add new ones

I also have nozdormu which I'm keeping just in case it gets changed somehow but chances are very slim.

should i DE my trade prince gallywix?

I don't play rogue so I don't really have a use for it, it also seems like a mediocre legendary

Baron geddon's place in CW is more of board control against shaman and paladin

Imo his effects are nice vs zoo, but not necessary. U have plenty of ways to deal with zoo and aggro (weapons, ghoul, belcher)

Ysera right now seems like a better craft since it's usable in paladin and priest also, and as trump would say it's more value! :)

Kitkatz uses ysera in his recent legend ctrl warrior deck, no idea whether to craft her or baron geddon tbh :P

thanks for the feedback guys :)

I'll probably wait until the meta settles for a bit then decide whether to craft grommash or not. Will probably craft him sometime soon tho since the rogue/warrior quest is basically auto re-roll for me :P

Also, what do you guys think of gorehowl? Worth crafting?

So i finally have enough dust to craft the control warrior deck (minus baron and harrison jones)

I was wondering if control warrior is still relevant in the current meta since warriors rose to somewhat deal with hunters. Especially with the plausibility of handlock rising to fame, CW might be in a bit of disadvantage. What do you guys think? Since i can use the dust to craft jaraxxus that can strengthen my handlock. (only missing grommash from the core control warrior deck)

The only decks I dont have available are freeze mage(no pyroblast), and paladin.  I appreciate your feedback guys :)

incorporated in every deck does not necessarily  mean a card is op or needs to be nerfed.

If that's the case then we should nerf druid of the claw, savannah highmane, fire elemental, keeper of the grove, etc just because they are really powerful and used in their respective classes.

Loatheb is a nice 5 drop value card. In a meta where combos and miracles exist it's a beastly 5 drop, in a minion heavy meta, it's a meh 5 drop.

Sylvanas was nerfed because it was too powerful. It was a 3 for 1 card for 5 mana which is auto include in every midrange and control decks. The reason almost everyone includes loatheb nowadays is a bit different. It's to try its power and to ward off freeze mage and miracle decks (mostly miracle)

This is what I used to clear out Heroic Maexxna. Basically you use tracking and novice engineer as card draw to get your combo which is timber wolf and unleash the hound and most importantly, explosive trap. Once you get your board full of hounds you just do as much damage as you can to kill her.

You can also replace arcane golem with wolfrider if you don't have them.