Are you actually kidding me?
Blizzard expects us to believe:
- They changed the artwork because it wasn't "up to standard" even though most, if not all, of the new cards look MUCH MUCH WORSE in comparison to the original cards.
- The game has a distinguishing artstyle, even though there's literally dozens and dozens of different artists commissioned to make the art for individual cards, and anyone that looks at the game for two seconds will notice completely different artstyles from card to card.
- The cards they replaced weren't replaced because of the suggestive or violent content they depicted, even though literally all the cards they replaced had suggestive content or mild gore, and they even replaced card names in some examples. but please, tell me again that the blood on Eviscerate was removed because it "wasn't in line with the artstyle of the rest of the game", and not because they don't want cards depicting blood.
Absolutely pathetic. Just own to your motivations. You don't want cards with a suggestive or overly violent content depicted. Fine, I don't care. Replacing them was irrelevant, but it's your prerogative. But, PLEASE, don't think we're all idiots and throw the most transparent, insulting lies in our faces and expect we won't notice.
Sad.
4
This card is SO fletch.
2
EZ PREY
2
We don't need no water, let the mother-hecker burn.
2
6, 7, 8 9 10
Back to playing Shudderwock again
2
Does League's Akali have a thicc horn? I don't think so.
6
Look at all these monkeys who think a turn 6, 3 damage AoE is bad on a Mage elemental.
3
1
This is my set waifu.
1
If you actually read the paragraph underneath, you'd see that FluxNashor explains how his winrate (62%) is slightly lower than the community's (66%).
5
Disappointed this deck isn't called "Slay the gunSpire"