• 2

    posted a message on Unpopular opinion: remove RNG card cheating Keywords

    If you want a card game without rng, you picked the wrong one, hehe. Try mtg or maybe gwent

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Nerf Stats on Game-changing Vanilla Statted Minions!!

    It's hearthstone, mmkay. No need to go all "balance" about it. 

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Blitzchung kicked out of grandmasters and banned from competitive play
    Quote from Ehronatha >>
    Quote from Calorat >>

    All this people saying they will boycott Blizzard, but they will continue to use their phones, laptops, desktops and every other electronic device, shoes, etc. ALL of which were built in China or use Chinese parts and puts money directly in the pockets of the Chinese government shows people don't really care what China does as long as they get their stuff for cheap and everything else is just flavor of the month fake outrage.

     What other options are there beside Chinese-made versions of those goods?  

     Well, by using second-hand devices/clothing/whatever else from now on you won't be paying china anything, technically. So it's a way of sorts. 

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on I don't wonder why players leave Hearthstone

    It's funny how any posts containing even slight criticism about the game are immediately followed by "Salt yada yada rant blah blah, go play chess, blah blah" fanboy posts. 

    My two cents: i left because of too much powercreep and too many random effects that basically left the strategy out of the equation. I had my good moments with hearthstone, playing since beta, excuse me for not loving the casual crap for small children it has become, hehe. 

    Oh, and just in case, my account here was created quite a while ago. 

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Do you have fun playing this game?

    No, not really. Still doing the dailies and collecting cards for some perverted reason. 

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on F2P Experience

    Well, speaking from the past experience of running two accounts - one "paid" and one "free", f2p experience isn't that awful IF you know what you doing and if you are at least somewhat good in the arena. That way you can make at least a couple meta decks with a little effort; when I was playing actively, I was able to even made a couple expensive ones, like say razakus priest.

    The new player experience, on the other hand,  is quite horrible in hearthstone compared to other digital card games I have tried/played. Having some starter decks available as one-time purchase for a couple $ or say 600 gold per 30-card deck would have been a really nice move towards new players, giving them some base to work on; the $5 newb bundle is great and all except being totally random, and getting some king krush from it hardly helps at all if you ask me. 

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 3

    posted a message on The Standard Brawliseum Has Taken Over Tavern Brawl This Week!

     

    Quote from ProfesorXYZ >>
     Well, let me check:
    • Refuses to play certain decks, on principle (e.g. Face Hunter). - nope, but i find some of them to be dull and/or non-interactive, with very little brain activity involved. Doesn't mean i ABSOLUTELY refuse to play them.
    • Refuses to play certain cards, on principle. - nope, but with some remarks from above. I feel nothing when i win due to some free 12/12 immune to spells on turn 6.
    • Refuses to play certain classes, on principle (e.g. Mage in Arena). - nope
    • Refuses to ‘net-deck’ and/or looks down on anyone who ‘net-decks’. - nope, basically any deck has some skeleton that you can't "invent" before someone who already did it.
    • Refuses to use ‘over-powered’ cards/classes/decks. - nope, with some remarks from above.
    • Professes a strong desire to win, yet refuses to spend a single penny/dime on the game. - i've spent enough, so again nope.
    • Insists on playing the same deck (despite the meta-game constantly changing). - can't say so, tho if i really like some deck, i'll try to adapt it to keep it viable.
    • Insists that most/all of his/her losses are due to bad RNG (the scrub rarely misplays). - well, that's a difficult one, ya know, due to the same skealful summoners/discover/get a random X etc. and rock-paper-scissors meta, hehe.
    • Insists that — despite losing — he/she is more ‘skilled’ than the opponent and/or ‘played better’. - can't say so.
    • Insists that players who don’t agree with the ‘scrubs rules’ are horrible, skill-less, people. - nope.
    • …and so on… - ellipsis is always the sign of mental superiority of the text author, kappa.
     So, without further ado, dear Professor, can you make a verdict - am i the ultimate NoBrodeStone scrub or i do have some hope? 
    Please hurry, as the lives of two innocent guinea pigs and a goldfish depend on it :3
    Posted in: News
  • 1

    posted a message on Who the hell enjoys to play Spiteful Decks? [Triggerino}

    "Reveal a spell from your deck and summon a minion with the same OR LESS cost" 

    Here you go, tho it will never happen in a casual card game oriented towards small children (or it may happen "soon", say a month before it rotates to wild, like patches & co). 

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Can we just say it already?

    The problem isn't the expansion itself, but the broken cards from the previous ones. Don't worry tho, they will be nerfed in a year or so, hehe

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on 5 000 wins How many do you have?

    About 7500 ranked/2700 arena spread over 2 accounts. Ain't playing much since gadgetzan cause of overall degradation of the game. 

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.