Hearthpwn

Hopefully we will see these events more often, like in Magic Arena. They're good alternatives to grinding ranked play. However, they should be separate from the Brawl; people want their weekly dose of jank without having to go full tryhard Standard

Bizarre that people are irate about the lack of dragons when we never heard a similar demand for large numbers of mammoths or ravens. Dragons are big and dramatic; you should only see a couple per set at most, lest they lose their luster. Unless the entire set is based around dragons, of course...

Would be a fantastic sideboard card, if such a thing existed. Otherwise it's a bizarre pack filler card that won't even see play in Arena.

Misdirection: not just a hunter secret. Wait until the actual reveal.

There's nothing "worrying" about that. Magic is currently in its third cycle of Ravnica, one of its most popular settings. The problem isn't repeating themes but providing interesting mechanics and fiction to ground the expansion. And I would say Boomsday and Rastakhan are huge improvements over their predecessors. I would love a revisit of Whispers but it's looking like a Dalaran theme, maybe a prison break or heist?

There's a lot riding on this upcoming expansion. It needs to be of a significant enough power level to enable new deck archetypes and get people excited for the post rotation meta without creating obvious winners. And while I've really enjoyed most of HS' roguelike offerings, Rumble Run veered into a level of oppressive non-interaction that needs to be avoided at all costs

Ben Brode infiltrated the HS server rooms

Man, "can't attack or be attacked" is a really weird rider that favors spell based removal. Really glad they changed it. Also interesting that they had to reiterate upon Shaman and Warrior loa - to the point where the live cards have almost nothing to do with these versions. 

Does Arugal also copy minions' cost reduction? I know +1/+1 to all minions in the deck is really good, but this just seems like a huge font of value. Gonna experiment with him, seems like a really powerful value-based inclusion, even if he doesn't reduce their cost (playing a 9 mana Alexstrasza copy and a 1 mana Crowd Roaster is still pretty damn good, for instance)

 While more of a payoff for buff decks, she still does quite well as a closer for heal control. Taking out a big dude and healing yourself for a pittance (or entirely free) is just too much for many decks to handle at that point in the game, especially if you can buff her. While not a meta-defining card, Shirvallah enables a lot of really fun Paladin play.

1.Zilliax is a priority craft it's the most versatile card in the game I would recommend crafting him ASAP, he is not a key card as the deck doesn't run mechs except the experimental safe I am trying currently (and it does OK I think). He is really good but the deck can function without him.

Lord Godfrey is one of many AOEs in the deck he is VERY powerful and crushes aggro if they try to develop a board in the mid/late game he isn't a must but very powerful, and really good against token druid.

2. By lackeys you mean rogue? cause I try to play as much proactive as I can mulligan for taunt givers, drakes,ooze, and giants as always a 4 mana 8/8 is good against any deck., play your AOEs efficiently be greedy when you can afford to and don't be afraid to tap even if it's aggro if you play the key taunts at the right time it's better than having 2 more HP.

It feels really good not to hear "NONE SHALL SURVIVE" in every single game.

Quote from LaFlame3500 >>

Dude the real answer to this is that ppl who run aggro decks are noobs, or at the higher levels, try hards. They arent playing for fun. The noobs are playing it bc aggro decks are cheap on average. The tryhards are playing aggros bc its the fastest way up the latter and in theory means you could go the furthest down the latter bc its faster and you can pick up more wins. Either way, it sucks for the people who want to make their own decks and play ranked. I go undefeated on casual but i take a homemade deck and faggro decks are alqays there ruining the fun

 You should get better at deckbuilding, obviously you don't know what aggro defense is.  

Quote from oyabun >>

Because i prefer to do something during the game than waiting for my opponents to put some minions on board while wanking myself with my removals.

 This

If i wanna play a card game, is because i wanna play cards, not hold them just waiting for something. That sad i prefer midrange, but aggro vs aggro is the most fun matchup in Hearthstone.

I actually think the most fun decks are the ones where you pass the first 8 turns. How can people not see how exciting that is.

Quote from LaFlame3500 >>

Dude the real answer to this is that ppl who run aggro decks are noobs, or at the higher levels, try hards. They arent playing for fun. The noobs are playing it bc aggro decks are cheap on average. The tryhards are playing aggros bc its the fastest way up the latter and in theory means you could go the furthest down the latter bc its faster and you can pick up more wins. Either way, it sucks for the people who want to make their own decks and play ranked. I go undefeated on casual but i take a homemade deck and faggro decks are alqays there ruining the fun

 Honestly I run aggro to piss of these sort of people.

I totally agree with you: moreover, it feels really strange (and satisfying) not to have to play around staple cards like turn 4 Flanking Strike, turn 7 Psychic Scream or turn 5 Fungalmancer.

It's happened at least two times in the last few games where I had a board full of small minions thinking "I hope he won't scream me" and just realizing some seconds later how silly I was lol

The last three days have been the best days of playing hearthstone. Sure, there's some stuff that needs to be fixed, but now if I get my enemy low on health, I know that they won't be able to pull out a get out of jail free card like; Bloodreaver Gul'dan , Frost Lich Jaina, or Deathstalker Rexxar

You should craft Zilliax. Everyone should craft Zilliax.