Hearthpwn

It is a bad card. Replace with good one and be happy.

A ton of people acctualy

disgustingly broken... AND I LOVE IT!

probably not

Quote from Eziomurzyn >>

Quote from Scratcher >>

Quote from iCampion >>

Quote from Scratcher >>

Quote from iCampion >>

Quote from sephalo >>

I'm not a kid- I'm 32.   I got through a deployment in Iraq, I can deal with some dude's emotes.  :)

 Seems to be quite the contrary since you're so arrogant to think anyone who is annoyed by something that you don't care about is just a kid and can't handle it. There's a difference between not being able to handle something and wanting something to be different that they just don't like.

 

 Wait, what?  I was just saying that emotes don't put me on some kind of rage-quit tilt during the games...something a "kid" might do.  What, getting so angry at a game isn't childish?  Please.

 No one here is "so angry", I don't know where you get that from. To imply that someone is a kid just because he writes in a forum (that is made for posting opinions) that he does not like it, isn't childish? Please.

 Don't mind me. Just Making the biggest quoting chain ever.

Change arcane missiles for arcane blast and it is even better!

Everyone is saying frezze, but in tempo mage I see more potential. If you have cheap spells and mana you can do tremendous work.

TOO SOON!

This plus doom

A priest deck with only this minion, ressurect and a bunch of spells

Sigh. Here we go again.  Jade didn't ruin control, it merely forced other control decks to find ways to win that weren't fatigue.  Because Reno is the only viable control oriented deck at the present (blame Kazakus and Patches, NOT Jade Idol), and because Renolock is the only Reno based control deck with end game burst/big finisher, it's easy to point the finger at Jade Idol for "ruining control."

Jade (Jade Idol/Druid specifically) didn't ruin control, stop saying it did.

Quote from Boss_of_this_Gym >>

The real problem here are garbage narcissistic control players who lack the skill of winning in ranked and don't allow you to complete the fucking 100 murloc quest even though is completely obvious you're not interested in winning

"I'm so pathetic that I want to play all my legendaries before killing you because I can't use them all in ranked"

I think it would be a fine idea for Tavern Brawl.

As i respect your opinion i dont agree with you. If you want to comparate Yogg with a MTG card i think it remembers me more: 

Woah there son. You can't have opinions around here. Why don't you go sit back in the corner and let the adults make some more useless complaints like a good little boy.

Prob;em is this could be abused more by aggro decks than control decks

Quote from TheImmondBeast >>

Let's help ourselves with another example: take a longish boardgame, Risk/Settlers of Cataan/Agricola/Puerto Rico. You play for like, 2-3 hours... one is clearly winning, others are fighting at their best, one is struggling bad and clearly losing. What if the losing player plays a card that says: "Flip a coin=win the game"? Would you consider this good design? Would you be satisfied with the outcome? Would you say good game, 'twas fun? Just some food to thought. Since I am an avid and experienced boardgamer, cardgamer and playtester I like to study games from a good/bad design PoV.

Quote from MadNomad1 >>

Quote from zeek81 >>

Does the paladin one give you n'zoth pally?  He should be pretty good in an all old gods meta no?

 N'zoth Pally is very weak in the current meta. It is one of the lowest meta decks on Tempstorm.

I can see why some might think this brawl is boring but for a free to play player like myself the chance to try all these decks is awesome.

This is a great brawl for players who can not afford to craft nice legendaries to play with .

5/5 .