I'm not a kid- I'm 32. I got through a deployment in Iraq, I can deal with some dude's emotes. :)
Seems to be quite the contrary since you're so arrogant to think anyone who is annoyed by something that you don't care about is just a kid and can't handle it. There's a difference between not being able to handle something and wanting something to be different that they just don't like.
Wait, what? I was just saying that emotes don't put me on some kind of rage-quit tilt during the games...something a "kid" might do. What, getting so angry at a game isn't childish? Please.
No one here is "so angry", I don't know where you get that from. To imply that someone is a kid just because he writes in a forum (that is made for posting opinions) that he does not like it, isn't childish? Please.
Don't mind me. Just Making the biggest quoting chain ever.
So today I got a "win 5 games as hunter" quest. I am a f2p player and dont have many cards, so making any deck other than face hunter to me is not a possibility, well not if I want to win. So I am one of this "cancer players" that play agressive or unfair decks in casual because I need to win a lot of games with a class that I dont have many cards with to do a quest. My point is, if I didnt have to win the games to complete the quest, I would not play those decks, I would play some other crazy shit instead. This would be fixed by changing the quest to "play 5 games as hunter". Done, I would never need to play face hunter again in casual. I understand there is problens with people just conceding 5 games in a row or others ways to "cheat" this system, but I do believe it would not be that hard to improve something like that. If you think about it, blizzard dont give us anything for loosing, What I do believe increases our behaviour to "netdeck" or play unfair decks, because why would you not? anyway just my opinion, what you guys think? p.s: sorry if bad inglish.
-5
It is a bad card. Replace with good one and be happy.
0
may be good but... your hero power deals 8 damage, that will probably be a pretty good win condition against control
0
Can be of use as a extra inner fire.
1
A ton of people acctualy
0
in portuguese is wrong too, the correct would be "carta opezona do caralho"
0
Just wondering what deck you recomend me to play just to chill in hs
1
-5
Change arcane missiles for arcane blast and it is even better!
0
My gromash for f2p control warrior
0
Why is it good?
0
So today I got a "win 5 games as hunter" quest. I am a f2p player and dont have many cards, so making any deck other than face hunter to me is not a possibility, well not if I want to win. So I am one of this "cancer players" that play agressive or unfair decks in casual because I need to win a lot of games with a class that I dont have many cards with to do a quest. My point is, if I didnt have to win the games to complete the quest, I would not play those decks, I would play some other crazy shit instead. This would be fixed by changing the quest to "play 5 games as hunter". Done, I would never need to play face hunter again in casual. I understand there is problens with people just conceding 5 games in a row or others ways to "cheat" this system, but I do believe it would not be that hard to improve something like that. If you think about it, blizzard dont give us anything for loosing, What I do believe increases our behaviour to "netdeck" or play unfair decks, because why would you not? anyway just my opinion, what you guys think? p.s: sorry if bad inglish.
4
Everyone is saying frezze, but in tempo mage I see more potential. If you have cheap spells and mana you can do tremendous work.
-2
TOO SOON!
4
A priest deck with only this minion, ressurect and a bunch of spells
0
And this one is realy cool flavour wise... you use the blood of the minion to make more of them