I would say absolutely if you intend to play for a long time. Having a few cool wild decks you really enjoy is the cheapest way to play, and the safest if you ever take an extended time away or anything like that.
I feel like this card's problem is that there's too many matchups where the effect is just bad. If you somehow land it against an odd paladin you could just clear the board with the hero power, which is great, but then you're paying 9-mana against an aggressive deck, so you probably don't really need it that badly. On the other hand, against decks like even warlock with a board of 8-8s and 4-9s, this feels underwhelming.
I wouldn't even call it poor wording. There's really only one way to read the card, but it may be difficult for people to whom english is not a first language. You are right in that it allows the hero to attack again, not Gonk.
5
Risky Skipper missing a pirate tag is the only reason I believed the leaks were real when we saw this guy before it was formally announced.
1
I would say absolutely if you intend to play for a long time. Having a few cool wild decks you really enjoy is the cheapest way to play, and the safest if you ever take an extended time away or anything like that.
0
Yeaaaah, I was toolin around with this list and went from rank 18 to rank 17 legend in about 6 hours. Seems pretty good.
0
Yeah, it'd be really interesting to see. I've been playing without preorder too. I'm curious how much of a difference 3 choices make.
0
I'm really curious myself. I've been sitting around 5.7k and I have no clue whether that's reasonable or not, but I think it's decent.
0
Neutral 3-mana 2/3 discover a spell alone is enough for me. I'mma definitely have some fun with this
0
As bad a deck as control warlock is against everything else, I have a really solid record against all of the current mage decks with it.
11
Come on man. You can hardly demand an "adult response" after your own comment. Be fair here.
16
I mean, given that Gul'dan is quite possibly the strongest standalone card in the game's history, that feels a little unfair.
3
Man, those Crushing Walls will feel nice coming back if you jam it. I'm into it.
0
I feel like this card's problem is that there's too many matchups where the effect is just bad. If you somehow land it against an odd paladin you could just clear the board with the hero power, which is great, but then you're paying 9-mana against an aggressive deck, so you probably don't really need it that badly. On the other hand, against decks like even warlock with a board of 8-8s and 4-9s, this feels underwhelming.
0
How is it that so many people here can't read this card. The hero attacks again. I'm confused how this confuses people.
2
I wouldn't even call it poor wording. There's really only one way to read the card, but it may be difficult for people to whom english is not a first language. You are right in that it allows the hero to attack again, not Gonk.
3
Reread the card. It says "it" which refers to the subject being the hero, not this dude.
0
By no means is this card unbelievable, but I feel lit's better than it looks. Having so many reasonable options could be really strong.