yeah i wouldn't say this is eloquent but i do agree. Unfortunately I think the only balance to this type of deck is to smack you in the face and we know how much fun that is!
This is working surprisingly well. I won my first 5 games at top 1k legend. Probably a fluke but just removing everything and having the troublemaker for the sustaining damage is pretty good. For some reason i really want rattlegore to be in here though.
This deck is fun but there is some antisynergy with pokelt and the discover package. If you play polkelt and have any discover cards in your hand (archaeologist/fireheart) they are just dead cards for the rest of the game.
this is actually really interesting and fun. likkem and lightning breath dominate hunter earlier game and sea giant is very good against rogue. Warrior is a problem.
shuffling 1 mana card in your deck is not actually very good without being to draw them. Academic espionage is terrible without some way to draw cards like sprint. Bwonswamdi allows you do shuffle a bunch of stuff, and then draw it, which is super powerful. But there is only 1 bwomswamdi in the deck
this decky is super janky. the previous version with zola was so much more consistent. it is so dependent on bwomsamdi and the spirits just almost never feel good.
This deck is very borderline on dragons and its weird you play sandbinder with only 1 elemental. It feels like there should be two more dragons and perhaps siamat.
This is a great construction and has some great cards. BUT, the fundamental problem is that the priest galakrond is just absolutely terrible. I want this deck to be good because its so fun, but priest got screwed, and it makes me sad because you are a priest only player.
2
No zephrys?
3
yeah i wouldn't say this is eloquent but i do agree. Unfortunately I think the only balance to this type of deck is to smack you in the face and we know how much fun that is!
0
This is working surprisingly well. I won my first 5 games at top 1k legend. Probably a fluke but just removing everything and having the troublemaker for the sustaining damage is pretty good. For some reason i really want rattlegore to be in here though.
1
This deck is fun but there is some antisynergy with pokelt and the discover package. If you play polkelt and have any discover cards in your hand (archaeologist/fireheart) they are just dead cards for the rest of the game.
1
these birds just become 9/9 with survival of the fittest :(
0
Shouldnt arcane breath be in this deck?
0
This needs more upvotes. This is super fun to play and would probably be the best rogue deck if it galakrond wasn't so powerful in rogue.
2
3 dragons definitely seems suboptimal
3
why dont you play lightning breath with so many dragons and not very much removal?
0
this is actually really interesting and fun. likkem and lightning breath dominate hunter earlier game and sea giant is very good against rogue. Warrior is a problem.
2
this deck just feels way too heavy. rogue, zoo, gk warrior, hunter, literally everything smashes you early game.
0
shuffling 1 mana card in your deck is not actually very good without being to draw them. Academic espionage is terrible without some way to draw cards like sprint. Bwonswamdi allows you do shuffle a bunch of stuff, and then draw it, which is super powerful. But there is only 1 bwomswamdi in the deck
0
this decky is super janky. the previous version with zola was so much more consistent. it is so dependent on bwomsamdi and the spirits just almost never feel good.
2
This deck is very borderline on dragons and its weird you play sandbinder with only 1 elemental. It feels like there should be two more dragons and perhaps siamat.
2
This is a great construction and has some great cards. BUT, the fundamental problem is that the priest galakrond is just absolutely terrible. I want this deck to be good because its so fun, but priest got screwed, and it makes me sad because you are a priest only player.