• 3

    posted a message on What Do You Wish For The Next Expansion?

    Here are my 3 wishes:

    1.  The Octogon (new game mode):  This is a ladder just like Standard or Wild, but it has a regular and random set rotations.  At the start of the month, randomly choose 8 expansions and/or adventures.  There are currently 18 of these choices not including Classic/Basic cards.  So I would also include Classic/Basic as the 19 choice.  These chosen 8 would form it's own meta game and would last one full month.  If you felt that 1 month was not long enough, make it 2 instead.  This mode would be completely independent of any new sets being released and would not necessarily include the new expansions.  Also, you should announce which 8 expansions are included about a week ahead of time to the change.

    2.  Tavern Brawl Feedback.  Being able to vote on and rate Tavern Brawls on a regular basis.  And a place to be able to suggest new ideas for Tavern Brawls.

    3.  Duality (new game mode):  For both Wild and Standard.  When Deck Building you get to choose 2 Classes instead of 1.  All cards from those classes are now legal deck building choices.  But because we want some semblance of balance, your deck MUST contain a minimum of 10 cards from each chosen class.  So you couldn't build a Control Warlock deck with 2 Pyroblasts for finishers.  It also means you cannot include more than 10 neutral minions/cards.  The whole point of this new game mode is to impose deck building restrictions but allow more freedom for combos and minion interactions.

     

    Posted in: News
  • 1

    posted a message on EVEN MORE LEAKED CARDS :D :D

    Some of these adventure cards, including these leaked ones (assuming they are real), seem like leftovers from the main set or were cut for some reason.  Some are really powerful and some are why is this even a card?

    Well, in the least the meta should be changing with a few of these cards.

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on New Mage Hero Card - The Amazing Reno

    I love the POOF all the minions are gone, but I don't like the random spells every turn.  Let's assume for simplicity that the spells work out in your favor 60% of the time.  Whether that is because it only affects you, your minions or does nothing at all.

    Is that worth it?  I imagine if we did the actual math and looked up EVERY spell, we would find the numbers not that high in your favor.

    You play this on turn 10, nothing on the board.  Pass to your opponent.

    Your opponent fills the board up again with 2 minions and does some other spell stuff.  You are faced with 2 minions and you have no board.  The spell trigger comes around...

    That is how we need to calculate the effectiveness of the hero power.  You do not have any minions but your opponent most likely will.  That means any spells that target minions that are beneficial is a bad result.  Board clears are a good result.  Friendly minion buffs do nothing.

    So we take all that math involved, but skew it towards the FIRST time it triggers.  What are the chances of good results?  bad results? and nothing or neutral results?

    But what happens when you take the board back because the spell clears their minions on your first turn trigger (good result)?  You go ahead and play a bunch of minions and then when the second turn trigger comes around, now what?

    This feels far too random to be reliable and competitive.  UNLESS you can somehow replace the hero power a few turns later.  The POOF is so good that its hard to imagine no one playing it.

    I dunno, I think ultimately, I would play around with it, get annoyed with the lack of Discover attached to the card and take it out of my deck.

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on New Warlock Epic Card - Chaos Gazer

    I think this fits into Highlander Warlock or Handlock in Wild.  In Standard, I just don't see it disrupting too many strategies.  The card is very good, but it is random and if the card is 'playable', then the opponent might play the card anyhow, and nothing is lost or gained here.

    I think this loses way too much value in the late game though as the cards that are playable will probably be played anyhow.  This is good exactly on turns 3 through 5, right in the mid game where certain cards might be conditional.

     

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Is Resurrect Unhealthy?

    The rez mechanic only becomes unhealthy when there are lots of supporting cards to sustain your life total.  Whether through board wipes or healing cards.  Taunt and death rattle cards make rez cards that much better because you are getting multiple bonuses without the ability to put 5 copies of a card in your deck.  You get that by substituting rez cards and hoping you get 'extra' copies of the same death rattle minion.

    So are there good supporting cards for Priest?  Yes.  They have healing, board clears and good value minions that generate more cards like Dragons.

    The priest deck is a control deck with the ability to keep annoying minions on the board.  Transform or silence will help in most situations.  If you DO find Priest to be an issue, the question is this:

    How does the Priest beat you?  Can you throw in Silence cards in your deck?  What is your deck designed to do, and specifically what turn does your deck typically try to win on?

    If your answer is your deck is trying to grind the game out and win on turn 10+, you will lose against rez priest.  Their minions are better value and once the quest is completed will be out of reach of killing them with your minions.

    If you are trying to go face and go aggro, then where do you find yourself losing?  Maybe adding silence or weapons will help?

    So to answer the original question....Yes, I do believe Rez is unhealthly IF the tools exist to support it AND there are no counter play tech cards.  There are both right now in Standard.  But also ask yourself....what is your deck trying to do to win?  Maybe ask for advice on how to beat Rez Priest with your current deck and provide a decklist?

    Then you can get an idea if your deck can even beat Priest in the first place.  For example, my Druid Quest deck with no OTK elements will never beat Priest.  How can I improve that if I find I am facing Priest after Priest?  Add an OTK element to the deck.  Or realize my win rate is terrible against Priest and concede if it appears you cannot rush them down quick enough.

    BTW, I don't know for sure the win rate percentages of Druid versus Priest, so if you know those, let me know.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Upcoming Adventure Speculation

    New cards will be fun as long as they are not auto include in every deck because the power level is obvious.  Make the power level related to specific deck types, not all decks.

    For example, Zilliax is universally good and why most decks play that minion.

    You know, like a Beast card that makes your other beasts better.  Or Dragon synergies since this is the year of the Dragon.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on New Balance Patch coming soon
    Quote from 1xbenx1 >>

    The problem with Galakrond is the Arcanite Reaper. The third form is so insanely superior to the second form because of the weapon that you just slap every parasitic card in the deck, flesh out the rest with class-specific card draw, and call it a day.

    I think you could probably fix this by doing a few things:
    (a) reduce the overall atk of the 3rd form's claw.
    (b) reduce the overall atk of the 3rd form's claw, and give the other forms smaller claws as well.
    (c) create a 4th form that has the fully powered claw.

    But instead, they're going to do shit like nerf Scion of Ruin or Galakrond's Might, killing the deck.

     Yep.  This is how they do things.  Make something crazy powerful and then nerf it instead of modifying it.  I would love if the team tackled the fact that they made a huge mistake with Galakrond and weaken the cards slightly.  You can do that by making it harder to reach the final form OR you can reduce the powerlevel of the last stage.

    The weapon is fair on it's own, but the fact that it enables the hero card later and the hero power from Galakrond makes the weapon stupidly powerful when you top deck it, means that your life total has to be above 15 AND the warrior has to have no minions on board.

    Also, I think everyone agrees that Leeroy is still a HUGE problem for Standard.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 4

    posted a message on Upcoming Adventure Speculation

    I am looking forward to this because Standard right now is not fun to play and I already beat and unlocked everything in the previous adventures released.  I like single player content because I get to enjoy Hearthstone without the oppression of ladder games.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 5

    posted a message on New Balance Patch coming soon

    The issue is that they push the power level of cards and then pretend it won't be a problem.  Anyone could see that double invoke for Shaman is powerful, but then combine that with an already powerful battlecry deck and you have yourself an overpowered card that needed to be nerfed to 6 mana.

    The other issue, which someone alluded to is the power level is heightened by on curve AND synergistic plays.  I play something on turn 3, then follow it up on turn 4 and finish with a nice turn 5 play.  That alone creates scenarios that are completely unfun to play against and while that might be a 'high roll' situation, it still makes things unfun because there is very little interaction that opponents can do.

    You have high value cards that generate more cards.  One of the largest weaknesses in the past to mid range or aggro decks was the fact that they would run out of resources and have to top deck.  How many of these decks are in 'top deck' mode these days?  And even if they are, the card they find helps them get more resources anyhow.

    This game feels like it has degenerated to the point that the game is no longer about trading minions efficiently, saving resources and making smart plays.  It feels like even if you make mistakes or over extend, you can refill your hand, refill the board and never get punished.  Does everyone find that sort of gameplay fun?

    You may joke about it, but playing a vanilla 4/5 Yeti on turn 4 was considered a good play.  Now that's not even good to do in Arena.  Now on turn 4 you can generate a 2/5 minion that when it dies, generates a 7/7 and also generate a 7/7 with a deathrattle weapon.  Turn 4, you get a 7/7 and a 2/5 with a 7/7 waiting in the shadows.  Tell me again how this isn't powercreep to the extreme?

    Or how about Shudderwock.  Remember all those battlecry effects that are now long gone and I FINALLY have the board clear and your hand is mostly empty.  Remember how I have started to turn the game around and finally have some minions on board?  Remember how none of that matters and you simply playing Shudderwock fills your hand up with more resources, clears the board and keeps minions behind?

    So Blizzard is now stuck in a rut.  If they don't produce overpowered cards each expansion, then no one will buy the cards.  But then these new over powered cards make an oppressive meta game and they have to nerf some of them.  Then the decks that were held in check by these tier crazy decks creep up and then they cause problems.  Now they are going to nerf some more cards.

    You might seem to think the issue is they need to stop printing over powered stuff, but instead, print it anyhow, get people to buy the new cards and then nerf them later if and when they become a problem.  Doesn't seem to be a good business strategy because people will eventually get fed up and leave the game permanently.

    And class identity has gone out the window now.  You have a shell of what classes used to be, because classes now can do whatever they want.  Archetypes no longer have weaknesses.  Aggro runs out of cards?  Nah, not anymore.  Mid-range has no big I win cards?  Nah, we got those too.   Combo decks are hard to pull off?  Nah, let's make it easier and on curve.

    So you have class and archetype identity no longer having any meaning.  Everything about this game is about cards that generate more and more value.  And power creep is so insane that if you even compare cards from 2 expansions ago, you would laugh at the joke.

    4 drop 3/2 minion with rush and reborn.  Nah, let's make something that summons an EXTRA 3/2 now.  BTW if you manage to buff the minion in your hand, you can actually make it do more stupid stuff like Galakrond battlecry for warrior turning them all into 7/6 minions instead.

    Drawing 4 cards used to cost 7 mana with no other benefit.  Now....well, Sprint is a complete joke of a card.  If you spend 7 mana to ONLY draw 4 cards then you will lose all of your games.

     

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on New Neutral Epic Card - Grizzled Wizard

    Not very powerful in most situations.  Very powerful in limited and specific conditions.

    Didn't see this card first go around.  It has some interesting counter plays but not sure if its worth a deck slot.  Depends on the meta.

    I think that only Highlander decks MIGHT be able to fit this in if they feel it necessary.

    I think the best use is to use it with either Druid Quest or Shaman Quest.

    Druid Quest AFTER you complete it.  As the Druid, you give your opponent a useless hero power after you are done using it.  Or if you don't have many choose one cards in your hand, use their active hero power for the turn and give them one they cannot use.

    Shaman but not hero power activation.  You swap hero powers for a turn, most likely they could not use it OR if they do get very little benefit from it. 

    Seems like an interesting card to play with, but best against certain classes with hero powers you want to deny or steal for a turn, like Boom hero power.

    I do agree that a permanent swap at 2 mana is far too powerful or bad for the game.  Now if this was a legendary minion at 10 mana, that would be different.

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.