7
Two questions...
1. How would they rig it? Pair you up with an available player with a tendency to play a deck that counters yours, who is themselves not on the final match before Legend?
2. Why would they do it? Your path to Legend is no different to his, hers or mine and yet other people do get to Legend. So why is your progress being singled out?
Also, take some time to toss a coin a few thousand times. See if there are any sequences of heads / tails that look suspicious...
2
Quote from Sherman1986 >>Quote from Crusader2020 >>What would you recommend for someone that can't draw? :)
I recommend you to try some modeling in Blender despite that. Try creating low poly models at first, they are usually easy to make and perfect for mobile. :)
Can't believe I haven't seen this thread, I am actually on the same boat in terms of modelling. I work as a Software Engineer but I am interested in making my own game and of course making my own assets. Following a Low Poly Tutorial on YouTube and made this out of it:
Its not much I know but its a whole different universe when you get to be creative and actually make something from scratch.
8
Somehow, in standard, there is always a tier 1 Face Hunter deck.
Every meta.
Not even close. However there is a dude like you every meta complaining about exaggerated or straight up false things.
Didn't read the rest of your post, not worth it.
2
They are removing buddies. I never thought they'd reverse that.
I may actually play BG again.
1
Boar Priest doesn't even beat Demon Hunter. The optimized deck that runs Bone Glaives and has a lot of damage from hand is definitely favored against Boar Priest (not by much, but for sure 55-45) if played correctly. For example not going all out on the board and playing into a Xyrella clear, but rather staggering threats while accumulating damage spells for a big burst before they can execute their combo
1
You
…
*ahem*
Git gud.
26
So even though pirate warrior is getting more and more support every expansion it's still far from viable deck. I want to share my ideas how to make this deck viable at least at low ranks.
Miss Smite - 6 mana 5/6 Neutral Legendary pirate - Your pirates have windfury.
Fathaarrr Benedictus - 5 mana 4/6 Warrior Legendary pirate - Start of the game: If minions in your deck are all pirates give all pirates in your hand and deck divine shield.
Seabound Inquisitor - 8 mana 8/8 Neutral rare pirate - rush, cost 1 less for every pirate you have. After you hero attacks an enemy this attacks it twice.
Smiteful Summoner - 6 mana 4/4 Neutral epic pirate - Battlecry: Reveal highest cost legendary pirate from your deck. Summon random legendary pirate with the same cost.
Patches the Buccaneer - 1 mana 1/1 Neutral legendary pirate - Battlecry: After you play this summon random pirate from your deck.
Your thoughts?
2
I dont think Smite is a problem, its more so changing the Juggernaut and Nellie to only summon/discover pirates that cost (5) or less. This way Hooktusk and Smite cant be generated.
I got no problem if they hard run smite, especially in 1200 legend where I treat them as free wins. Its a problem in the gold plat areas but people should understand that they make up the majority of the playerbase and their opinions might not match with ours (aka high legend players) but the game is designed for everyone. So we dont need any toxicity (Ive done it as well in the past).
Let me know what yall think about my change; removes the highroll without nerfing smite.
4
Smite is fine. Every deck should have high moments and Smite/Nellie are perfectly acceptable cases of this, just like other decks have hero cards and legendaries of their own. Warrior doesn't run a lot of draw so it's not like they get Smite or Nellie every game, and Nellie is countered by silence which every deck runs at this point.
And Quest Warrior does not have a high winrate at high ranks, it's like a tier 3/4 deck at that point. In other words it's really good against bad decks, and really bad against good decks. Plus it's getting nerfed tomorrow.
4
Quote from Wrathblade >>i don't care what cards get nerfed i have copies of all cards and i never disenchant anything useless they are nerfed. i exercise extreme resource management. what u can do is what i started to do when these clowns started nerfing.... so u basically do this! you open 200+ packs awesome every expansion i do that from farming arena cuz that's my main mode after that i keep all the cards and don't do anything else! i do over 200+ arena runs PER EXPANSION i wait for NERFS EVERY NERF CARD GETS disenchanted and u keep the REST. i've been doing this since nerfs were ever introduced in hearthstone. that means that i'm hovering around 123,000 gold and 350,000 dust as of currently and that's how i've done it at this stage i just have every card and half of my collection is golden it's not hard it's just proper resource management
Oh my god, you are awesome. Can i be your friend?
Click on the buttons to change the PopCard background.
Click on the button to hide or unhide popcard elements.
2
Buddies were a fun addition for a while but definitely glad it's not permanent. They made the game a lot messier, with a bunch of broken interactions
3
Just remember to tempo out the cookies vs. aggro
8
If mr. Smite is nerfed you'll get 1600 dust. Isn't that alone almost worth the 2000 gold? Seems to me buying the set is worth it whether it's nerfed or not
1
Right now the tempo of the 7/7's plays a fairly relevant part in the games ending a turn or two after quest completion.
If you went all out and made them 5 mana 1/1's instead it would definitely scale back the explosive finishes of those games.
But keeping the stats and increasing the mana cost instead is probably a better way of doing it.
4
Great! Hunter definitely needs more damage that can go face
12
I like the approach of buffing more cards than they're nerfing. Should lead to a lot more experimentation and shaking up the meta. Often nerfs just tend to change the powerlevel of the various deck rather than lead to new ones.
5
So Crabrider must be the neutral Murloc getting nerfed. My guess would be 1 less health. 4 health is just too hard to deal with that early
1
Having less polarized matchups should definitely be a goal. Playing a matchup where you have 30-40% chance to win is a lot more fun than one at 10-15%. But it can be a tricky thing to balance in a game where players deliberately develop counter strategies.
Personally I don't think a deck like face Hunter should ever be tier 1. It should be tier 2-3 and something that can be brought out to punish slower, greedier strategies.
A card like Tickatus is mainly problematic because it feels terrible to play against. It's winrate isn't that high. But another aspect of it is that it potentially locks out other control strategies, forcing the meta into a corner.
10
I think the powerlevel of the card is really high compared to something like Polymorph or Hex. It could easily be nerfed by increasing it to 2 mana or decreasing it to 2 missiles and it would probably still be a playable card.