• 0

    posted a message on New trend?
    Quote from makissan >>
    Quote from aule10 >>

    Hey Today 4 people have invited me as friend, and then whispered i should die of cancer because i play cancer. First of all they did not have any understanding of the deck i play. I play midrange secret pala today with only 3 types of secrets, and not a cancer deck. But that they take time to invite you as friend, just to insult you because they lost, that is just hilarious. I was wondering if that is a new trend or something. By the way they remove friend as soon they are finished.  

     Maybe you were playing ultra badly, and was lucky. Losing against someone who plays ultra-badly and plays a cancer deck that almost pilots itself can make someone very salty.
     Nope Not really i just outplayed his control warrior in the late game. He was just really bad, or his decklist was. As told before i play mid range and when he use all his control to remove muster and shielded minibot, then he had nothing left for Dr. Boom or sky golem, or tirion. I didn't even get the challenger at any point in game. And it doesn't really matter in my deck list, because i only run 3 secrets.  avenge, Sacrifice and 1 repentance. 
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on New trend?

    Sry Wawro, but a cancer deck is an agro deck. Midrange is not agro.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on New trend?

    Hey Today 4 people have invited me as friend, and then whispered i should die of cancer because i play cancer. First of all they did not have any understanding of the deck i play. I play midrange secret pala today with only 3 types of secrets, and not a cancer deck. But that they take time to invite you as friend, just to insult you because they lost, that is just hilarious. I was wondering if that is a new trend or something. By the way they remove friend as soon they are finished.  

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • -1

    posted a message on "Priest is too hard!!! Let me play your deck, it looks easier!"

    And sure you lose some and you win some. But you don't have to make your changes worse, by playing "fun" decks.

    Posted in: "Priest is too hard!!! Let me play your deck, it looks easier!"
  • -1

    posted a message on "Priest is too hard!!! Let me play your deck, it looks easier!"

    LOL Best rank ATM is 7, mostly because i don't have time to play all day. It just the way the world is. The people that play for fun, is the people that will never get to the top 10%. They will lose with their Fun 2 play deck, as soon they get past rank 15.

    Posted in: "Priest is too hard!!! Let me play your deck, it looks easier!"
  • -1

    posted a message on "Priest is too hard!!! Let me play your deck, it looks easier!"

    It have never been fun to lose, But how you tackle the loss is different. The enjoyment of the game to the point you lost, can be fun, but if you lost the game, the negative feeling you will feel after it, can override the positive feelings you felt during the match. It is like be on an emotional rollercoaster, and only few find that enjoyable. There are OFC. people that dont care if they win or lose, But those are people that are missing the competitive gene.

    Posted in: "Priest is too hard!!! Let me play your deck, it looks easier!"
  • 0

    posted a message on Rank 3 Mech Mage (NO FEL REAVER) [s19]

    It looks like a standard Mech mage, so it mostly is the way to activate Anton

    Posted in: Rank 3 Mech Mage (NO FEL REAVER) [s19]
  • -1

    posted a message on [LEGEND] Patron warrior isn't dead

    Hmm I am thinking Justicar Instead of Harrison. I understand that Sylvanus can be a decent replacement, but more often than nought it is dealt with, with no real damage done to the opponent. And 4 armor every turn is harder to deal with, than Sylvanes. 

    Posted in: [LEGEND] Patron warrior isn't dead
  • 1

    posted a message on [LEGEND] Patron warrior isn't dead

    If you have a winrate at 40% you will have a really hard time getting to legend, no matter how much you grind. Because you lose more than you win.

    Posted in: [LEGEND] Patron warrior isn't dead
  • 0

    posted a message on [71%] Xyrronlock

    I think my way of using it, is way better :D

    Posted in: [71%] Xyrronlock
  • 1

    posted a message on [71%] Xyrronlock

    Is the sacrificial pact for when you are rage quitting, by using it on your own jaraxxus? 

    Posted in: [71%] Xyrronlock
  • 2

    posted a message on [LEGEND] Patron warrior isn't dead

    Well I can See one big problem with this deck. If your opponent have board control, He will not have a hard time dealing with the patrons. But they are effective to make the opponent to react on the board instead of dealing damage to the face. But If you are able to keep the board clean until the patrons are on the table, then it can be hard to deal with. It is more balanced than before, and is now more easy to deal with. But it have also become harder to play.

    After Playing 10 Games with 6 win 4 loss, at rank 7 EU, I would say this: The deck require Practice, and skills I have yet to gain. You need to know when the time is for a push. You cant really play it as control, but should be played more like a midrange, But you cant always play it as midrange. This deck is more about knowing when to play it like this, and play it like that. Not all is able to change Tactics, in the middle of a game, but you kinda have to with this one. And therefore it needs a lot of practice, And is not friendly to Non Legend players.

    Posted in: [LEGEND] Patron warrior isn't dead
  • -1

    posted a message on [LEGEND] Patron warrior isn't dead

    How is it unstopable? We Can now deal with the patrons and evt. frothing when it comes on board. Basicly The counter is board control. Something you could not have before, because of charge.

    Posted in: [LEGEND] Patron warrior isn't dead
  • 0

    posted a message on Drunksteed 2.0 |DING DONG THE WITCH IS DEAD|

    The point is Get the steeds on board with rivendell, Then get riven killed, and then mal'ganis.

    Posted in: Drunksteed 2.0 |DING DONG THE WITCH IS DEAD|
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.