Hearthpwn

The meta is as diverse as a rotating format ever will be, but that dosen't mean that Demon Hunter is balanced. For me, the problem is only the sick swing turns Altruis can get, though. Demon Hunter Should be good at card draw so Skull is fine in it's current state and I guess The class are supposed to have a lot of damage even IF you koll every single ninion the turn they play them. But Altruis going face is just to much. He can turn around a match faar to easy. He should only be a removal tool.

That is the only card I would nerf though. 

Altruis got better with the "nerf". What the hell were they thinking? Her 4 attack makes it harder for priest to kill..... 

Holy shit, people in this community.... 

Quote from Nimehte >>

Zephrys problematic it doesn't recognize most of the new cards after each expansion. I opened similar post after Galakrond expension but it got even worst after the outland. 

 He is supposed to only offer classic and basic cards, so that's not the problem. The problem is that he is stupid. 

The problem with Altruis is not the mana cost... The problem is that it is a far superior Wild Pyromancer that also hit's face and not his own minions. It's the reason DH is a problem, combined with Skull of Gul'Dan. Change it so it can't hurt face (and 3 mana cost 3/2) and Skull of Gul'dan 7-8 mana. 

What I think they should so is add a third format. Stop the nerfs and start banning in both Standard and Wild to balance the formats. This is the way it works in MTG and I think banning is superior to nerfing because this way people can play The banned cards in the third format. I would have loved to get to play old Patron or Worgen Warrior again :/

Buhuhu, nerf this and that. I hate every single aggro deck (I really think it's a brainless type of deck to play) but I understand that a card game needs different types of decks. Can you please understand that The game needs slower, grindier decks? 

Not a bug. If they are collected at any point they count. 

Quote from JibbaNerbs >>

As weird as it sounds, what they're doing makes a lot of sense.  When you release a new class, nobody will know how to play it, meaning that whatever happens, people are going to be noodling around for a bit like newborn deer.  More to the point, it's not gonna be easy to reliably release something that's truly balanced right out the gate.

The problem is, if you release a weak version of the class, what you'll get is a bunch of people trying it, deciding they don't like it, and then not touching it.  Then, when you get around to buffing it to a balanced state, people just... aren't playing it.  That means less data, and less ability to tell whether the class is  actually  good, or whether it's still too weak.

By starting in an overtuned state,  everyone  plays it, and you can pretty immediately figure out what needs nerfing.

Leastways, that's about what I've heard happen in DotA, and I'm assuming Blizzard is doing something like that here.

 They don't need the players to understand that Skull of Guldan is too good. I hope they are playtesting at least. They released it this way to earn money. Nothing else. 

You do understand that what makes a deck good is a mix of cards, right? You want both free cards and not free cards in a Demon Hunter deck. And no, it's not benefiting the guys who bought packs because they liked the Demon Hunter cards..

Quote from arneankann >>

 

Quote from FortyDust >>

 

Quote from arneankann >>

 

Quote from Sherman1986 >>

Quote from arneankann >>

So you want to ruin the game for us wild players, just so you can have a laugh once or twice when you are bored? 

LOL, there are much worse things currently in Wild (like Naga Sea Witch) for your kind (super competitive players) than pre-nerf Yogg-Saron.

 

 That´s not even a little true. Naga Sea Witch follows a game plan and if the plan dosen´t work or the opponent plays around it, they are screwed. Yogg pre nerf is a card that makes unwinnable games to a victory, just by pure randomness. It has no business at all in a card game. It´s just bad card design. 

 You can be in exactly as bad a position in terms of health and board state when you play N'Zoth, and win because you played N'Zoth. The prep for both is similar, only in one you play minions and in the other you play spells. Same with DK Gul'dan.

If you play a 10-mana card that you built your entire deck around, it should win you the game most of the time.

 

 N´Zoth dosent win you unwinnable games, he can win you close games. It´s a far and powerful card, Yogg is just a ******** card that people played when they were otherwise screwed.

And no, a 10 mana card shouödn´t win you the game most of the time. It should be powerful, but not a card that wins you a game from nothing.

As a genuine answer to your question, it's to encourage people to play Standard for a bit after the rotation. This sounds weird - most people play Standard anyway, right? - but as more sets rotate to Wild, it starts to look like a more interesting option to people with larger collections.

So they encourage you to try out the new Standard meta at first, instead of switching straight to Wild and following your collection.

hehe, wild

you know, because it's a druid hero and... I'll show myself out