"I personally believe that this deck is bad, and that Skulking Geist is not a good replacement, as this deck cant win on value even if he play 0 jade idols."
That's a way better way to put it than "????????XDDDD Nice troll".
First, I don't hate aggro decks, I just love control a lot more.
Anyway, the reason why isn't because they're easy, it's because even with a lower winrate an aggro deck will generally win more games than any control deck, since the games finish so fast. It means a player who is really bad could still potentially get legend faster than a decent control player if they have even a 51% winrate. Again, I don't hate aggro players, I just don't enjoy playing it/against it
current dust calculations is done client side, so it loads the decks, and then calculates within your browser.
The "show decks i can create" does a bit mask type setup to figure it out. adding in dust, would make this impossible.
While doing a feature like this is "possible" it hammers the servers very very hard. We would have to heavily limit the feature (like a premium thing with no ads..etc)
Ah, thank you for explaining. Didn't know it was that complicated
Not currently possible and has been requested in the past. Locked due to duplicate suggestion.
But isn't there already a dust filter? I'm not denying your claim, but I'm curious how making it filter required dust is harder. Is it because it's different for each person?
I don't mean the dust cost of the deck, I mean the "dust required" part where it looks at your collection and shows many cards are missing and the cost of crafting them.
There's "Only show decks I can create", but that's pretty binary. Either you can't make it or you can. Even if you're missing one common card it doesn't show.
Just say I want to find some new decks, and I have 2000 dust. You could type in your dust amount (or Innkeeper could look at it), and there should be an option called "show decks I can craft", showing decks where the remaining cost is equal to or lesser than your dust.
0
Kolento did not invent this deck
0
This is not "Kolento"'s deck. He might have played it, but it's not like he invented it.
-3
This is not "Kolento"'s deck. He might have played it, but it's not like he invented it.
9
Fixed version:
"I personally believe that this deck is bad, and that Skulking Geist is not a good replacement, as this deck cant win on value even if he play 0 jade idols."
That's a way better way to put it than "????????XDDDD Nice troll".
2
Do you need Soggoth
2
Deck can work perfectly fine without 2x faceless, thalnos can probably be replaced by tainted zealot. Maybe put in a shadowflame
0
This is not mill. This is fatigue warrior.
0
Battletag:Jaraxxus#1970Server: NATrade only?: Yes, you go first0
First, I don't hate aggro decks, I just love control a lot more.
Anyway, the reason why isn't because they're easy, it's because even with a lower winrate an aggro deck will generally win more games than any control deck, since the games finish so fast. It means a player who is really bad could still potentially get legend faster than a decent control player if they have even a 51% winrate. Again, I don't hate aggro players, I just don't enjoy playing it/against it
0
0
But isn't there already a dust filter? I'm not denying your claim, but I'm curious how making it filter required dust is harder. Is it because it's different for each person?
5
I don't mean the dust cost of the deck, I mean the "dust required" part where it looks at your collection and shows many cards are missing and the cost of crafting them.
There's "Only show decks I can create", but that's pretty binary. Either you can't make it or you can. Even if you're missing one common card it doesn't show.
Just say I want to find some new decks, and I have 2000 dust. You could type in your dust amount (or Innkeeper could look at it), and there should be an option called "show decks I can craft", showing decks where the remaining cost is equal to or lesser than your dust.
0
Here's the thread:
https://boards.fireden.net/vg/thread/198227557/#198251149
However I don't know if it should be removed... Kolento's name should be removed since it's not his, but the deck itself should stay
0
Battletag: Jaraxxus#1970Region: NATrade Only?: Yes0
It's Y'Sh (pronounced yash) - a - arj (pronounced similar to "raj"). So he was correct, it's pronounced yash-a-raj