• 0

    posted a message on Cards from Core i'm excited for
    Quote from fusilli >>
    Quote from Yonas11 >>
    Quote from fusilli >>

    Double Jaraxxus! Having two Jaraxxuses (Jarraxus? Jarraxi?) is sweet. Honestly, as a combo player there's nothing too interesting - which seems fair. The Johnny cards should realistically come in the expansions.

     I got some sad news for you...

     Which is? Two different cards as I understand it, particularly as they're two different types of cards. Should both be usable in Wild, right?  Or is core set STD only or some tripe? No, that would make the entire thread pointless.

    Or do you mean on Johnny cards? Considernig how recently Il'gy got printed...

     Nope, there is only one version for standard/wild. The old version is gone, except for in the new classic mode.

    https://twitter.com/DanielTheBigBu1/status/1365018739553501193

    Posted in: Wild Format
  • 1

    posted a message on Cards from Core i'm excited for
    Quote from fusilli >>

    Double Jaraxxus! Having two Jaraxxuses (Jarraxus? Jarraxi?) is sweet. Honestly, as a combo player there's nothing too interesting - which seems fair. The Johnny cards should realistically come in the expansions.

     I got some sad news for you...

    Posted in: Wild Format
  • 0

    posted a message on Bots in standard ranked
    Quote from Haedeius >>

    To be fair, I wish I encountered bots on EU server. I can't really say that I have. Probably they are only in the lower ranks, since they won't win. If I were you, just see it as a free win, despite it's annoying to have a long game. And hey, it also gives YOU more XP ;-). 

     Lol, bots are smart enough to reach legend, so you might've run into some.

    Posted in: Standard Format
  • 0

    posted a message on What’s with all the Ropers?
    Quote from adpbnp101 >>

    XP isn't awarded for lenght of a game but total time in game....so that's not the reason. Must ropers think they get an easy win, so its strategy, and its allowed.... All things go within the rules of the game......But I agree, it's a shitty strategy.

     No, that is the reason. Longer games = less time in menus = more xp per hour.

    Posted in: Standard Format
  • 2

    posted a message on Bots?
    Quote from Pherosizm >>

    I played a game in the Brawl today against a warrior... he made legitimate plays as soon as his turn started, spent his mana, seemed real.

    Then roped.

    Every turn.

    This doesn't seem like a bot to me. Is it just a JERK?

    I gotta be honest, this is the kind of thing that is going to make me annoyed at HS. But how would Blizzard even fix that? People should be allowed to take their time and think. But to do this on purpose when you don't need to... uhg.

     People are only doing it because Blizzard encourages them to do it by designing a system in which you are rewarded more by afking than playing.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on UNPOPULAR OPINION: I LOVE Hearthstone's New Update

    Ahh yes, a more expensive game with less players is such a good idea. Why dont blizzard just increase the price of packs to 200 gold, then there'd be even less players,

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Blizzard lied about the new reward system
    Quote from SinAscendant >>
    Quote from 3nnu1 >>
    Quote from 3nnu1 >>
     Told ya, blizz out to milk the whales and try to pick up a few spenders out of the f2p's while alienating the rest. This is what a game looks like when the devs are just trying to get as much cash out of it as they can before it dies. 

    Keep in mind though, that there are still people defending Blizzard and claiming that HS is cheap and anyone who thinks otherwise is whiner.

     I think the amount of people who actually think that is rather small, there are some highly vocal people who are paid to say that and give the impression that people think that. 

     Lmao what a ridiculous conspiracy theory

    Companies dont pay people to go forum troll dude. That makes no sense. 

    HS isn't cheap, per se, but the only ccgs on the market with a better monetization model are maybe Gwent and to some extent Runeterra. 

     

    I believe it has a fair cost for what you're getting. You can play HS entirely f2p and I did for over 5 years, I only started buying last year because I started making more money and could afford it.

     

    They've even been adding more and more extras to the preorder bundles over time, as well as handing out free cards and packs like candy, even entire free decks.

    Things that Blizz has added over the course of the game:

    Pack reward quests

    Guaranteed legendary in 1st 10 packs

    Free legendary every xpac

    Increased gold rewards from quests

    Free singleplayer content, that in many cases awards packs

    Free additional game modes

    Entire current meta decks for new and returning players

    An entirely new class that you get the whole set for free

    Etc etc.

     

    What exactly are you expecting from.a free to play game? Do you expect to be able to have a meta deck of every class or something? I mean dont get me wrong I would love that, but it's not realistic.

     They've added a bunch of ways to get more rewards, which is great. However, the game has become more expensive to play over the years, which you should also consider:

    They removed a yearly adventure and added a new expansion per year.

    They added adventures back on top of the 3 yearly expansions.

    Expansions will now have 25% more cards.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on Blizzard's response to the whole system revamp

    People who want to pay thousands for everything are idiots. There is a middle ground where you get your moneys worth, and sadly Hearthstone ain't that way.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Blizzard wants to make money - is it a problem?

    It is not a problem that they want to earn money, the problem is how they do so.

    The game is simply too expensive, which it also was before the new reward system.

    I wouldn't recommend this game to anyone I know, even though I play a lot and really love playing.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on Blizzard lied about the new reward system
    Quote from Denza >>

    Just for the record guys: none of the BIG GUYS (Kripp, Trump, Kibler) have outed their opinion regarding this gamewide issue. Don't let them ever fool you thinking they are on our side. Because they are not. They don't get their pay from Blizzard, but from their fans. But they are so stingy, that they are afraid to lose the free bundles they recieve from them for keeping their mouth shut. I am disapointed.

     Kripp didn't skip

    https://twitter.com/Kripparrian/status/1328248218321293313

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Celestalon math is wrong
    Quote from JoshoPrime >>

     And yet he WILL earn less.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Why is everyone in this forum defends this greedy a$$ company?!
    Quote from Platy >>

    Not really siding with Blizzard, just that it doesn't matter to me whether it is the new or old system. 

    All these years, I usually pilot just one or two decks to legend or at least rank 5 each expansion. 

    When I get bored of ranked, I play arena or battlegrounds which are entirely nothing to do with your collection.

    I don't see how the new system will affect me. 

     So it wont affect you that you'll have less gold and cards?

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on XP values

    Yes it does.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on Why is everyone in this forum defends this greedy a$$ company?!
    Quote from Platy >>

    If you are F2P, why will you insist on owning every legendary in a new expansion. 

    If you are P2W, how is this game expensive compared to mobile gacha games. People throw thousands at gacha just to get a particular top tier hero, whereas a mega bundle cost less than a hundred once per quarter.

    Lastly, if you notice, even top tier decks use less than 10 cards from a new expansion. In other words, if you have been playing for example hunter now, all you need is probably craft 5 cards or so and you can continue enjoying the new expansion. Why must you be greedy enough to insist on having a full collection to enjoy the game

     Getting your moneys worth is not greedy. Why are you defending this shit?

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 5

    posted a message on What is Bliz doing about ropers

    Blizzard is the one that enables and encourages roping.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.