Hearthpwn

I think old murkeye rotated so this will not otk

Clears mogu cultists sure, but it's a single use warpath so ehh

It's decent, but kill command usually goes face anyway.

This might again prove the point that the legend cardback should be different depending on what deck you used mostly to get there. My previous, still pending idea for the Evolve Shaman cardback was to feature a golden retriever in front of a computer screen.

Quote from sPacEtiMe19 >>

Quote from jinstronda >>

Quote from hillandder >>

Broken as hell!!!

This card should have dragon in hand condition instead dragon tag, it is absurd.

x2 8/8 rush tech (x1 in highlander decks) in all decks until rotation.

 It’s 6 mana not that good 

 Lol? It's amazing. Bigger argent commander. Tribe. Can't just cheap spell the leftover body away. Can play on empty board and divine shield can't just get pinged off by mage or other such effects. This is beyond solid, and certainly beyond "not that good." 

 Rush cannot hit face, it's a different mechanic. Pay attention.

Thank you for posting this deck. Grants me free wins whenever I face it. Golakka Crawler

Quote from TardisGreen >>

Quote from YellowDisease >>

Quote from ShadowAldrius >>

Quote from agikarus >>

Meh, Nourish is probably better to play.

 Nourish is pretty much a garbage play now. Way too greedy without any sort of tempo component and jumping from 6 to 9 mana isn't THAT impactful.

I think this is good for a treant deck. A lot of the new treant cards let you play a lot more treants early on, so cards like this are a lot stronger. Hell, you can combo this with force of nature for 0 mana if you really want.

 Coin or Innervate Nourish on turn 5 draws you three cards and you're at 9 mana next turn being able to play Cenarius that will at least give you two 4/4 taunts at the very least.

What an pile of fail.

 Thank you for the contribution. I think your reply had one too many words in it for you to be able to spell it correctly.

Quote from Dendroid >>

This expansion is amazing.  Great reprint, and pay 1 mana for 2 health.  I'm glad they're pushing Pirate's again to counter the greedy Reno stuff.

 How is Reno greedy? Highlander Mage isn't even very popular.

Quote from ShadowAldrius >>

Quote from YellowDisease >>

Quote from ShadowAldrius >>

Quote from agikarus >>

Meh, Nourish is probably better to play.

 Nourish is pretty much a garbage play now. Way too greedy without any sort of tempo component and jumping from 6 to 9 mana isn't THAT impactful.

I think this is good for a treant deck. A lot of the new treant cards let you play a lot more treants early on, so cards like this are a lot stronger. Hell, you can combo this with force of nature for 0 mana if you really want.

 Coin or Innervate Nourish on turn 5 draws you three cards and you're at 9 mana next turn being able to play Cenarius that will at least give you two 4/4 taunts at the very least.

 In a quest deck, yeah. I just meant as a vanilla play. In a quest deck, Nourish is obviously very good.

 Quest Druid is the only Druid deck right now. It will take more than a few trents to make people want to switch to something else.

Quote from ShadowAldrius >>

Quote from agikarus >>

Meh, Nourish is probably better to play.

 Nourish is pretty much a garbage play now. Way too greedy without any sort of tempo component and jumping from 6 to 9 mana isn't THAT impactful.

I think this is good for a treant deck. A lot of the new treant cards let you play a lot more treants early on, so cards like this are a lot stronger. Hell, you can combo this with force of nature for 0 mana if you really want.

 Coin or Innervate Nourish on turn 5 draws you three cards and you're at 9 mana next turn being able to play Cenarius that will at least give you two 4/4 taunts at the very least.

Imagine posting a promotional screenshot of a card that has had its mana cost reduced.

Would be unplayable even if it was 4 or 2 mana.

Quote from TardisGreen >>

Quote from YellowDisease >>

Quote from Live4vrRdieTryn >>

Oh my god you freaking babies. Maybe you should be less concerned about how the "toxicity" of rude people bothers you and concentrate on WHY it bothers you. The healthy response to someone you dont even know chanting "Justice demands Retribution" at you is amusement or indifference. If it seriously bothers you you have issues.

 What's your point? The healthy response from Blizzard would be to spend 5 minutes coding the function requested into the game, and this would be a non-issue.

You think it takes 5 minutes?  Are you a software engineer?  I don't think so.

What you definitely are is a "special snowflake".  It was suggested earlier that you should seek help.  You should take this advice seriously.

 I don't think there's anything 'special' in wanting them to add a seemingly simple feature to their game. You don't need to take it literally. Then again, this is the same company that took 2 weeks or so to engineer and code their new feature of 1000 win hero portraits to function, so who knows? It must be way more complex than you'd might think.

Quote from Live4vrRdieTryn >>

Oh my god you freaking babies. Maybe you should be less concerned about how the "toxicity" of rude people bothers you and concentrate on WHY it bothers you. The healthy response to someone you dont even know chanting "Justice demands Retribution" at you is amusement or indifference. If it seriously bothers you you have issues.

 What's your point? The healthy response from Blizzard would be to spend 5 minutes coding the function requested into the game, and this would be a non-issue.

Quote from EternalHS >>

Quote from YellowDisease >>

Quote from Hooghout >>

Quote from YellowDisease >>

Quote from vNihilism >>

You're mistaken if you think you're one of the "normal people" while asking for default squelch and comparing your hurt feelings to a "shotgun wound". 

 Hurt feelings? Who's projecting that? That's like saying if I'm annoyed by someone spamming messages to me or constant junk email for example, it means my "feelings are hurt" by it. The emote system in the game is used only for trolling, BMing and spamming 99%, of the time.

Blizzard wil never autosquelch  as it is a marketing mechanic devised to please the target audience: the mindless aggressive face is the place/otk types who see it as part of the 'fun' exp. to emote and BM. Repulsive. reprehensble, abhorrant. Morally corrupt, ethical invalids for whom the right thing is to create toxicity as a marketing strategy.

 Could not have phrased it better myself. I don't understand why this is so hard for people to understand.

The fact that the only person with whom you've found a common ground on this topic is a raging lunatic who talks shit about ethics and morals while, at the same time, calling everyone who likes the game a "subhuman fanboy" should show you just how much in the wrong you are.

 How so? Do they not sugarcoat their words enough when pointing out the obvious flaws of the game? I know people on this forum are used to circlejerking and bandwagoning, so it must be shocking when someone comes without a differentiating point of view.