• 0

    posted a message on Reno Jackson is really cool in CW

    So you are winning all the matchups in which CW had already before a high % win?

    Posted in: Warrior
  • 0

    posted a message on Should older adventures be free for new players?

    Maybe this new adventure with 4 wings for 20 dollars may open the way for a decrease to 20 dollars of the global cost of old adventures...It may be a fair discount.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Is it just me or the ladder is filled with BOTs right now?

    Probably people is farming for the incoming expansion...

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 5

    posted a message on Fix (buff) Big Game Hunter to ignore your own minions

    Like BGH wasn't enough OP...

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on What beats Control Warrior?
    Quote from ElementalLord >>

    Shaman is the best counter for any contr deck

     Not sure, I find freeze mage very hard as shaman.
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Is mech mage still viable?
    Quote from DoubleSummon >>
    Quote from snakeindagrass >>

    I feel as if it isn't played because tempo mage is better so you wouldn;t need to play mech.

     how come tempo mage is better? I feel it's way more incosistant, it has less minions and it relies on the spell synergy and drawing the spells when you have the spell synergy minions up. I palyed it (without antonidas) and got crushed constantly and I am always crushing them with my other decks, they are way more dependant on rng.. and I don't like it, and I think mech mage is way more consistant deck, but I might be wrong.. probably it has some benefits.
    Maybe my rng sucks who knows.. still playing Unstable Portal though.
     Yeah I struggle a bit vs hunter so far but I guess that's why I put *2 annoy o trons :D
    Any major kind of mage is a pain for mechmages. With tempo mage very present and the freeze mage that start to appear this is not a season for mechmages...
    Posted in: Mage
  • 0

    posted a message on What beats Control Warrior?

    Midrange decks are a pain for control warrior. Multi-threat decks too (like shaman).

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Headed for Legend - S19 October 2015

    It was 2 weeks that I was blocked around rank 4-5. Today I changed from combo druid to face hunter and finally did legend ><

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Opponents with Fel Reaver
    Quote from Alsvent >>

    The reason Fel Reaver is not a good card, is not exactly the discards(althought they do matter!).

    What the discard does, is limit Fel Reaver to fast decks only. If you use it in a midrangish, or control deck, the effekt will ruin you.

    The reason it ain't great in fast decks is because It is just one big minion minion, with "just" good stats and nothing else. A fast decks, needs something to influece the board right away, like a charge, deal dmg to a minion, or something else.

    On top of that it will oftentimes just catch that one hard removal that your enemy allready thought useless in his hand.

    So all in all: He is too Slow for fast decks, and his effekt prevents him from being played anywhere else.

    Fel Reaver IS a good card.

    Otherwise why people play it, and reach legend with, in fast Shaman, Druid and Mage decks?

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Let's Create Some New Mechanics! ---(NEW) Poll: Which ones did you like the most?---
    Quote from Yuvalito jump

    Apart from Truesilver Champion, i don't think there is a card with this effect in the game (correct me if im wrong)

    Blessing of wisdom give a minion "beathdown: draw a card".

    Posted in: Fan Creations
  • 0

    posted a message on Should Warrior's armor have a maximum cap?
    Quote from szabozalan jump
    Quote from Timeiscandy jump

    I'd really be surprised if they introduce a nerf to armor, or a card that counters armor, as I really can't see the point. There's no downside to armoring up? You have to use two mana to do it every turn or play cards that give you armor. That's a downside. Sure, a lot of those cards are pretty good, but you still paid 6 mana for a 5/5 or 3 mana to draw a card. If I'm doing that I sure as heck better get something else out of the deal. 

    Ultimately though, Warriors don't have a terrifically high win rate - not even Patron, and the issues that deck has have a lot less to do with armor than they do with other things. Why would Blizzard want to devote the time or design space to addressing something that's so rarely a problem. I have to imagine it's working the way they want. I mean sure, if Warriors ended every game with 30 armor we might have a problem, but Warriors end a decent number of their games at 0 armor, and 0 health to boot. I may be missing something, but Blizzard doesn't seem interested in printing cards that counter class mechanics, so why would they do that here?

    The problem with armor is twofold.

    1.: from balance perspective, it is far superior to healing as you can go above max. This limits other classes to be successful as a control class. If you give classes tools to fight that much health, other classes like priest which also supposed to have good survival skills, has no chance to compete.

    2.: Warrior has already too many sources of armor and we will see more and more decks ineffective against control warrior as they simply run out of damage and die in fatigue. It is not yet a big problem, but we are getting there.

    There is no problem with armor. You may compare the warrior power with the priest power only the day that warrior would be allowed to add armor to the minions...

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Why do people think making it to ranks outside legend is impressive?

    I see some incoherence between "almost everyone can reach legend" and playing HS for over 2 years and never reach the endgame (and this even just to get the cardback). And I think that a lot of people largely overestimate the time required to reach legend rank.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Why do people think making it to ranks outside legend is impressive?
    Quote from HomerRupaul jump

    Why do people think making it to Legend is impressive?

    And more importantly, why people still use bold in forums in 2015?

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.