Hearthpwn

In WoW its stretched way too far, but in HS its fine I think. SP mode one month after expansion is good imo.

The 3 month of nothing afterwards is the problem :)

I´d enjoy it once as well, but imagine one is the decider game and right after it, the next players choose Warrior first as well.

Thanks for posting this deck!

Went 8:0 and lost 3 in a row afterwards with really bad draws, but I am still hooked on the deck :)

I suggest to add an Ooze though, it helps a lot

Raiding Party, backstab against non Warriors, 3-drops and Underbelly Fence (you should play it on turn 2, if you dont have another option)

According to this thread every deck beats Spell Hunter :D

Quote from darkstar2 >>

THE QUEST HUNTER POTENTIAL

 Nice, totally forgot about the Quest!

If you like Hunter, craft Shaw. He is staple in a lot of Hunter decks and will be very useful in the next expansion without a doubt.

If you cant craft him, then use a Kodo for charge instead.

The art of this card is amazing!

Quote from Strongpoint >>

Quote from KingSevault >>

Didn't the Spark theme already prove that this will be really weak?

1\1 rush elemental anywhere is nowhere close to 1\1 rush beast in hunter.

It is a fire fly that trades 1 health for rush and all hunter beast synergies. You can Houndmaster it, you can razormaw it. You can buff hyena with it. You can even make it poisonous with Toxmonger

 While I agree with your statement, none of the mentioned cards is currently played in Hunter. It would need more support to be played I think.

It doesnt fit in Deathrattle or Spellhunter

Quote from inus95 >>

Quote from FireBurn >>

Quote from inus95 >>

I'm not arguing, but I personally don't see Odd Rogue as skill heavy deck.

Turn 1 Argent Squire / Diremole / Firefly
Turn 2 Hero Power
Turn 3 Hench Clan Thug
Turn 4 Hero Power + another 1drop + Cold Blood/Deadly Poison OR another Thug + 1drop
Turn 5 Fungalmancer

This is basically the only play Odd Rogue will ever make in the first 5 turns, so I don't see it as deck where you "need to think". You just send everything face and silence your opponent's taunts. I'm not saying that in control decks, you need to think, but I (like a lot of other people) prefer control over aggro and that's why we dislike Odd Rogue. Also Odd Paladin, that one is even more disgusting. 

 Sure and tempo mage for an example is more skilled with Mana Wyrm at round 1. and than face/face/face + fireballs and pyroblast into the face hoping the opponent does not heal or gain armor?

And playing druid who's only job is to get these  mana crystals and wait for pallys/rogues to full their board so they can use spreading plague is another science fiction? Maybe the harder part is when you need to gain 12 armor out of 4 mana card?

And playing Odd Warrior is even harder with only gaining armor, clearing the board with ton of yours removals and then easy win in late game?

There is NO deck in this game that is hard to pilot if you are at least a decent player. I hate to lose against aggro decks, especially ZOO but saying that control deck is harder to play is just a pathetic excuse to me.

Kid, please, learn to read, before you speak. This is what I wrote: "I'm not saying that in control decks, you need to think, but I (like a lot of other people) prefer control over aggro" word for word. I specifically said that I don't think you need to think harder when playing control, so what's your problem and what was the point of your comment?

"Kid, please" is such a funny insult. If both of you were born in the 90s, FireBurn is correct, you are both kids (and no, this is not an insult!).

Even if an argument is correct, responding and reresponding this way will always devalue a point.

@topic: Aggro decks usually dont take a lot of thinking. You will think a lot in the first 10-20 games, but as soon as you get the hang of it, its pretty much autopilot. In case of OddRogue its 1 drop, dagger, 3 drop, protect the board, Giggling/Fungle/Cobalt and face afterwards. 

Ppl just dont like decks, which they lose against, when (in their opinion) they played better.

Btw there ARE complicated control decks out there. Its really not correct to say Druid or Warrior are easy or autopilot decks. Players bait out removals and dont flood the board, so the control player have to carefully evaluate what ressources to use. 

I have a lot of fun with Deathrattle Hunter atm and its far from auto. Had a very long game vs Odd Warrior just now and we both went into fatigue. Epic game with a lot of thinking^^

First they came for Jaina Proudmoore, and I did not speak out—
Because I did not play mage.

Then they came for the Secretkeeper, and I did not speak out—
Because I did not play sectet decks.

Then they came for Succubus, and I did not speak out—
Because I did not play her in my zoo deck.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.

No, thank you.

Removing the mech tag would completely fix everything tbh.

No extra discovers from project (greatly reducing the value in the spell in standard) and no rush via Boom.

Their reason for not including auto-squelch is just ridiculous. This is not a matter of toxicity, it's a matter of distraction. Many people wants auto-squelch because the emotes, even the thinking emotes, breaks their train of thought and it's very irritating. How can they not see that? 

It's easter, who'd be more fitting to take the crown than bunnyhoppor? ;)

Inner Fire / Divine Spirit are way, way, way worse than Mind Blast.

People that plays wild hated Big priest high roll with Barnes and now we see more ressurect cards with total disregard for a healthy wild game.  Totally uncreative in my opinion 

It is a fine card, but lore wise it is not powerfull enough to be Khadgar. 

This is not epic enough for such a cool character :(

I mean... it's good but I hate Priest :l