I've played around with the build. I put 2 stonehill defenders (was previously using tar lurkers to slow down the mid game) most of the time I'm pulling the lurkers off the stonehill defenders. Taunts have helped me slow game down in order to get the full power of the 3/2s. Also Helps with some extra card generation and give some extra discard options. Seems like it is a lot more consistent with that. Also threw in two cruel dinos and took out the doomsayers. The deck hasn't had a problem stopping aggro with the taunts and defile.
Do you feel like Lanathel is worth it? I've been running a very similar deck and I found it to be a bit inconsistent. I ended up discarding Bloodreaver and that feels bad.
3
Zavas is going to be nice but ultimately isnt going to be a win condition
0
i burned terim and tryion against a control pali. Super fun
0
Megatron#1513
Na
Trade: yes you go first
2
I replace bloodmage with Zealot, prince v with spellbreaker, and black knight for lich king for buget purposes. 3 and 0 so far awesome deck
0
I've played around with the build. I put 2 stonehill defenders (was previously using tar lurkers to slow down the mid game) most of the time I'm pulling the lurkers off the stonehill defenders. Taunts have helped me slow game down in order to get the full power of the 3/2s. Also Helps with some extra card generation and give some extra discard options. Seems like it is a lot more consistent with that. Also threw in two cruel dinos and took out the doomsayers. The deck hasn't had a problem stopping aggro with the taunts and defile.
0
Do you feel like Lanathel is worth it? I've been running a very similar deck and I found it to be a bit inconsistent. I ended up discarding Bloodreaver and that feels bad.