• 0

    posted a message on Taking a year off competitive Hearthstone
    Quote from Malygoddd >>

    Competitive hearthstone... Has never even reached legend. Damn, what a shame. You’ll be missed.

     Malygodd do you have inside info if you will be HOFed on April? If so I will craft a golden one of you and then pray day and night to your glory

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on New Third Game Mode - Real Casual Play Network

    Sorry for the interruption, and for spamming, but can someone please do a small recap of what league are we talking about and how someone can participate? what decks and so on

    Posted in: Players and Teams Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on I think the Druid nerfs were bad
    Quote from TardisGreen >>
    Quote from Tzon_e >>
    Quote from TardisGreen >>
    Quote from Tzon_e >>

             Well for me the worst thing about druid nerfs is that the class popularity beforehand was quite good, resulting in a meta that all the classes had above or close to 10% play rate. Since nerfs were out, druid players switched to hunters, hunters lost a really bad matchup so they grew exponentially and also a lot of zoolock players switched to this class as well, due to saronite nerf. This resulted in a meta with one class being overplayed. Before you call me salty or point me to the salt thread, (it's pretty easy to find it, saltiness is everywhere), I don't have problem playing against hunter due to lose rate or whatever but due to repetitiveness.

     So much fail here.  What substantiation do you have to make the statement “Druid players switched to Hunter”.  And what Druid deck was a bad matchup for Deathrattle Hunter?  Token was a slight favorite, but the matchup was winnable for Hunter.

    Salt is salt.

     So much fail here(Quoting you).

    1st fail) Deathrattle is a single hunter archetype. Even against it, with the proper ramp, Malygos Druid could defeat it. Also token, could easily defeat DR Hunter, I was farming them actually with Token druid, as well as other hunter archetypes. I better not speak for the other hunter archetypes, I guess you were not playing the game at this period from your answer and also never looked to the stats. 

     2nd fail) The other classes have not risen their numbers in players(some lost playrate and other won) and hunter went from...12-13%? to 31%. While druid was like 17% and now is below 5% I think. So given these facts, where did this 12%+ of druid players went? Did they vanish? No, if you do the math, they moved to this class, because they were netdeckers and whatever class is dominant they follow it like meta sheeps. Simple as that. If your math is different, please provide so. Everything in life is math dude.

    BS is BS , hatred is hatred and huntards are huntards.

    P.S I was playing a lot spell hunter during Witchwood expansion, now I am hardly touching it. I was always playing a lot homebrew or meme decks like Tess Rogue or Evolve shaman with Zentimo and so on. This is just to catch up with your logic that is going to accuse me as a druid player lolw.

    Seems like you are the one full of hatred.  Maybe you were "farming" Hunters with Token Druid.  But no more.  The SALT is real.

     Yes I hate netdeckers like you, not the class, otherwise I would have never played so much Hunter(first golden hero).

    The fun fact is that I provided evidence about the "fails" and you didn't even questioned it.

    The sad fact is that the trolls like you don't provide useful conversation, I feel sorry. This is why I will stop answering you. 

     

     

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on I think the Druid nerfs were bad
    Quote from C_A_W >>
    Quote from Tzon_e >>

             Well for me the worst thing about druid nerfs is that the class popularity beforehand was quite good, resulting in a meta that all the classes had above or close to 10% play rate. Since nerfs were out, druid players switched to hunters, hunters lost a really bad matchup so they grew exponentially and also a lot of zoolock players switched to this class as well, due to saronite nerf. This resulted in a meta with one class being overplayed. Before you call me salty or point me to the salt thread, (it's pretty easy to find it, saltiness is everywhere), I don't have problem playing against hunter due to lose rate or whatever but due to repetitiveness.

     Warrior and Priest had 10% play rate before nerfs ? I don't know from where you are getting these numbers but in my experience, before nerfs, Warriors were pretty rare closely followed by Priest and Mage.

     

    Quote from C_A_W >>
    Quote from Tzon_e >>

             Well for me the worst thing about druid nerfs is that the class popularity beforehand was quite good, resulting in a meta that all the classes had above or close to 10% play rate. Since nerfs were out, druid players switched to hunters, hunters lost a really bad matchup so they grew exponentially and also a lot of zoolock players switched to this class as well, due to saronite nerf. This resulted in a meta with one class being overplayed. Before you call me salty or point me to the salt thread, (it's pretty easy to find it, saltiness is everywhere), I don't have problem playing against hunter due to lose rate or whatever but due to repetitiveness.

     Warrior and Priest had 10% play rate before nerfs ? I don't know from where you are getting these numbers but in my experience, before nerfs, Warriors were pretty rare closely followed by Priest and Mage.

     I said close to or above, that means also less than 10% . I am frequently looking to statistics from hsreplay, hearthpwn and vicioussyndicate  and compare them to sum up what's going on in the game. I don't also think that Warrior were rare , Odd Warrior was and is still played a lot.  As for the other 2 classes, especially Priest was not played that much I agree, its popularity has grown since it counters Hunter. 

    What I am trying to state here, and others have stated as well in other threads is that the class diversity play rate was bigger before nerfs. 

    Also in my games this month from rank 9 to legend I faced less Rogues than Druids! Actually  I faced 5 odd rogues out of 88 games, and none other rogue archetype. So I think that a single person's stats are not that indicative. ( I am playing at EU Server)

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on I think the Druid nerfs were bad
    Quote from TardisGreen >>
    Quote from Tzon_e >>

             Well for me the worst thing about druid nerfs is that the class popularity beforehand was quite good, resulting in a meta that all the classes had above or close to 10% play rate. Since nerfs were out, druid players switched to hunters, hunters lost a really bad matchup so they grew exponentially and also a lot of zoolock players switched to this class as well, due to saronite nerf. This resulted in a meta with one class being overplayed. Before you call me salty or point me to the salt thread, (it's pretty easy to find it, saltiness is everywhere), I don't have problem playing against hunter due to lose rate or whatever but due to repetitiveness.

     So much fail here.  What substantiation do you have to make the statement “Druid players switched to Hunter”.  And what Druid deck was a bad matchup for Deathrattle Hunter?  Token was a slight favorite, but the matchup was winnable for Hunter.

    Salt is salt.

     So much fail here(Quoting you).

    1st fail) Deathrattle is a single hunter archetype. Even against it, with the proper ramp, Malygos Druid could defeat it. Also token, could easily defeat DR Hunter, I was farming them actually with Token druid, as well as other hunter archetypes. I better not speak for the other hunter archetypes, I guess you were not playing the game at this period from your answer and also never looked to the stats. 

     2nd fail) The other classes have not risen their numbers in players(some lost playrate and other won) and hunter went from...12-13%? to 31%. While druid was like 17% and now is below 5% I think. So given these facts, where did this 12%+ of druid players went? Did they vanish? No, if you do the math, they moved to this class, because they were netdeckers and whatever class is dominant they follow it like meta sheeps. Simple as that. If your math is different, please provide so. Everything in life is math dude.

    BS is BS , hatred is hatred and huntards are huntards.

    P.S I was playing a lot spell hunter during Witchwood expansion, now I am hardly touching it. I was always playing a lot homebrew or meme decks like Tess Rogue or Evolve shaman with Zentimo and so on. This is just to catch up with your logic that is going to accuse me as a druid player lolw.

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on I think the Druid nerfs were bad

             Well for me the worst thing about druid nerfs is that the class popularity beforehand was quite good, resulting in a meta that all the classes had above or close to 10% play rate. Since nerfs were out, druid players switched to hunters, hunters lost a really bad matchup so they grew exponentially and also a lot of zoolock players switched to this class as well, due to saronite nerf. This resulted in a meta with one class being overplayed. Before you call me salty or point me to the salt thread, (it's pretty easy to find it, saltiness is everywhere), I don't have problem playing against hunter due to lose rate or whatever but due to repetitiveness.

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Casual Ettiquette
    Quote from TB124 >>
    Quote from Luke1708 >>

     They are playing more cards to complete their quest faster... Concede if you don't want to watch them.

     Exactly that... And also, I hate when people cry, that some people play 'meta' decks in casual, it doesn't mean that they are asaholes... I play metadecks too sometimes for a quest. For example I get a win X games with Shaman, I need the gold, and I don't actually play Shaman at all, but I have the cards for a metadeck, so I play the games fast in casual. Just because somebody dislikes it and cries for it, I will not play that deck on ladder... Also sometimes, I'm not sure if i will have time for a ladder game, or I just want to warm up, that's why we have casual... 

    People who cry for casual having metadecks, can go and play against the innkeeper...

    Ps: before someone calls me a fagot, I usually let my oponents win on casual, if I don't need the win for the quest.

     

      Well, if you are a new player and you want to win games, or do a quest or so, you can also play some games with your hearthstone friends, Blizzard is allowing that and I don't think they will stop doing so. 

    Also I agree with some aforementioned comments, casual is great for testing some meta decks if it's your first time playing them and you don't have the safe net of e.g rank 5  but you are at rank 2 and don't want to lose ranks while switching decks.

    I actually reached for the first time this season , legend, but tried clone priest about 10 games in casual beforehand. Call me with whatever nicknames you want. Upon reaching legend, I am mainly playing Tess Rogue , resulting me going from 1200 to 2000+ rank :) (I don't really care about playing in tournaments or whatsoever right now)

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Wild Bundle pack opening
    Quote from TheMessanJah >>
    Quote from Tzon_e >>
    Quote from TheMessanJah >>

    i think i will buy the pack just for the dust. I dont play wild...

     Well according to statistics average pack's dust is around 105. So you will gather about 4000k dust. I don't know if it worths the money dude.

     If i spend 20€ in "regular" packs i would not have 4000k dust!!! I think it's worth ;)

     Yes, indeed :P Hope you stand lucky and get a golden legendary ;)

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Wild Bundle pack opening
    Quote from TheMessanJah >>

    i think i will buy the pack just for the dust. I dont play wild...

     Well according to statistics average pack's dust is around 105. So you will gather about 4000k dust. I don't know if it worths the money dude.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Thoughts on the Upcoming Hall Of Fame Roation?

    Well I also don't find any card so much oppresive as to be HOFed. But I am not playing wild so some cards like DKs, hunter's spellstone etc, that I consider to be fairly OP, will not be a problem for me, but may be a problem for Wild players. So I personally think that since none of the current core-basic cards are too much oppresive, the wild community should speak its thoughts as to which cards are affecting it right now and will continue to affect the game after April. Again, this is only my personal opinion.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on First time legend

    I don't want to spam and create more threads, but since it is my first time legend also I want to share it :) (well I guess no one cares :P )

    Still I think that the win rate(from about rank 9 ) is quite good I think :

     

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Should I dust priest?

    Well , from your list I can see that you may have a chance to create the dragon control priest that is kinda of "hot" right now, it farms hunters and according to vicious syndicate it's tier 1 deck. 

    I am playing also Priest(the Clone Priest) with winrate 67% from rank 9 to rank 1.

    Stick with a decent deck, learn it better and don't dust anything until April. That's my opinion of course.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on GJ Team 5.
    Quote from endlesstides >>
    Quote from Ilfirinor >>
    Quote from endlesstides >>

    According to the latest Meta stats over the last week, up to this morning at 8am, Spell Hunter was 12% of games played, Midrange Hunter 8.9%, Clone Preist 5.05%, Deathrattle Hunter 4.9% and Control Priest was 4.7%. 

     Vicious Syndicate reports Hunter to be 31% of all decks played and 32.8% between ranks 1 and 4.

    https://www.vicioussyndicate.com/vs-data-reaper-report-116/

    Quote from endlesstides >>

     

     The Top 10 decks across ALL Ranks for WR are four Hunter Decks and 6 others. That's not in order, but that is 60/40 in favour of non Hunter Decks.

     I dunno, but it just doesn't feel that oppressive to me. 

     In terms of winrates, it's probably not. In terms of playrates, it definitely is.

     

     I just don't get it though. If a Class is being seen a lot, but isn't at the top of the tree in Win Rates, what's the issue? I read a post above (sorry I've forgotten who it was) that said that a Whole Meta was being shaped by certain Decks. Surely it's always been that way?

     

     Actually I have been playing for 1 year exactly and what annoys me , and the majority of the people(about 67% of them , I exclude 2% that are immune to boredom like you), is that this meta post-nerf is hunted down by hunters. Play against a single class every 1 in 3 games, is not funny for me, and I am here for the fun. With Druid, that wasn't the case. Druid players were never more than 20% .

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 3

    posted a message on GJ Team 5.

    Actually what annoys me is the percentage of hunters in ladder, feels really boring to face a single class all the time and also feels boring to see that 31% of players are meta sheeps(the sheeps go where their breeder tells them --> breeder is the meta win report).

    Druid was strong, but never have I seen 31% of players using Druid.

    There is a plethora of decks that farm really hard the hunters. And do you know the worst nightmare of Hunters? Odd paladin(according to hsreplay, it has positive win rates with each hunter archetype) . The level up nerf hardly touched its win rate, and since the 31% of players are hunters, odd paladins are going to appear more often from now on. And for me odd paladin is the most cancerous deck ever. Soon my hunter friends, soon , you will rip what you sow , you will unleash hell to earth.

    P.S I was playing some meme decks before with slightly positive win rates pre-nerfs. Now I can't even touch them, that it what annoys me most.

    P.S.2 All these people talking about go to salt posts and so on, why you even bother reading everyone's opinion and then judging them if you are pre-determined to be negative? Just don't read the posts :D or else offer a good conversation, is that so hard for you? Unless you are huntards :P

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on I'm joining them
    Quote from iandakar >>
    Quote from JarlBallin >>

    Oh no, I'm not making a Cubelock or Zoolock. Things aren't that desperate/sad yet.

     

    I'm crafting Zul'jin. Bash Hunters all you want,he looks genuinely fun and game-swingy. 

     I don't know.  I have no problems with playing hunters, but I'm really unsure with how well that card will work once rotation hits.  

    It's high impact, but only because it puts so many wolves on the field right after you wiped out so many other wolves earlier, and becuse you can swap into the DK afterwards.  

    All of hunter's current decks rely HEAVILY on last year's sets.  There's not really much for him to work with except perhaps token/beast hunter, whiich doesn't sit well with Zul'jin.  

    Zul'jin looks fine now but feels risky.  Of course I'm the one that crafted healadin and spirit of the dead priest so warning against 'risk' seems rather hypocritical so. there :P

     Hello fellow anti-meta meme deck builder. I have also crafted Healadin, Battlecry Rogue, Mecha'cthun Rogue, Shudderwork Evolve Shaman, Bananaz Priest and a lot other meme decks. You are not alone in this world :P

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.