• 0

    posted a message on Where do you see Rogue headed in the meta?

    JAlex:

    AAECAaIHBLIClwa+rgPZ0QMNtAHtAogH4gePlwO5uAPPuQOqywOK1APf3QPl3QPn3QPK4wMA
     
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on 1500 XP Quest Trading - Play A Friend! (#7)

    Battletag:Tuscarora87#2753

    Region: EU

    Trade only? : yes, you go first

    Posted in: Players and Teams Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Il'gynoth seems incredibly powerful
    Quote from sPacEtiMe19 >>

    Yeahhh it’s gonna be pretty insane with a massively buffed Aldrachi.

    What i’ve been meaning to ask is, does this extra damage apply if your hero is at full health? Or does your hero need to have been healable in order for the damage to be converted? 

     Doesn't need to be healable.

    Potentially a strong card, but imo nothing to be scared of.

    edit. Also, let us wait if more of related cards get released.

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on 18.4 Patch - Nerfs (Guardian Animals;Tortollan Pilgrim), Elementals in BG & More!

    High skill deck is a snobbish illusion. Better player just plays any deck - better. That's the whole mystery. If data show that a deck sucks on average, it sucks. And data can recognize a lot, for example taking into account only Legend top 1000. If "high skill deck" is bellow 50% there, it's no high skill, it just sucks (in the meta) (or plays bad cards). A top player with a positive variance will still win less with that deck than with statistically better deck. Tempo Storm is a joke. Just take a look on their most recent snapshot. It's an opinionated snapshot, ranking decks by perceived power based only on frequency rather than by matchups vs. common meta decks (like VS). Regarding The Meta list for HSreplay (free), just ignore it, it's a mess with no analytic value. Recognition system is the first messed up thing there. Talking about Mage, I've been so mad playing vs. it recently, usually thinking I'm losing those matchups every time. Then, at the end of season, I realized how biased my feeling are- after looking at stats: 30-12 winrate. The deck is carried by highrolls and it wins and loses on them (drawing Evocation) which often looks abrupt (and I hate it; because Blizz balances meta with these highroll factors in several classes - decks wins / loses no matter what, I mean by drawing / not drawing something). On the other hand, just look at the matchups. Mage loses to Bomb Warrior, Soul DH, Druid... 

    Posted in: News
  • 2

    posted a message on 18.4 Patch - Nerfs (Guardian Animals;Tortollan Pilgrim), Elementals in BG & More!

    Ok, but why leaving Evocation.

    Posted in: News
  • 0

    posted a message on Best counter for bomb warrior

    Face hunter

    Posted in: Warrior
  • 0

    posted a message on How Important is Magtheridon in Soul Demon Hunter?

    As others told you, don't run Mag, unless you want to decrease your win-rate.

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Getting 11 stars for the first time? How "high legend" do you need to be?

    Are legend rank and mmr the same, or not?

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Getting 11 stars for the first time? How "high legend" do you need to be?

    I got 11x for the last 3 months (EU), barely playing. My rank decayed to 3400 in August (entered at 2800). Usually, I achieve 60-110 wins per month with 60% winrate. This month - still Gold, lol. I wonder would I get 11x by only reaching rank5, or no way? I'll try to force myself to get Legend, although currently not in HS mood at all. The meta seems good, but playing an other game, rn.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on The D5-Legend grind
    Quote from jetsxz >>

    Shaman and hunter are some of the poorest classes to ladder with. Pick a aggro rogue and stick with it, at least games will end fast

    Shaman is garbage, but Face Hunter is the best deck in the game.

    Posted in: Standard Format
  • 0

    posted a message on New 'unique' game mode!

    "Creative", "unique" and "fun" decks = bad decks.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Cards I would hall of fame.

    Most of aggressive decks kill Priest.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Legend after two years

    Congrats! Competitive approach in HS is always much more satisfying than just playing it for memes or a single game experience. By playing plenty of ranked games and breaking milestones (and even rng) you show it's not coincidence, but your capabilities are making some difference in an even field. And we humans are vertical beings, always moving, daring, overcoming obstacles, again and again. Breaching milestones feels great for that natural reason; self-excuses about staying away are only some evil demons sitting on our real secret aspirations. Thus, the greatest obstacle is a psychological barrier and breaking through it is the greatest joy of them all. It sheds that burden which was keeping you in place, discouraged, convulsed and under a doubt, decaying... It restores self-confidence for everything and sets you free... catching with difficulties becomes a joy.

    Last games are often memorable for their drama or difficulty. Two months ago I won in a big style - enraged double Gromm lethal; then Blessed Champion lethal. The last pre-legend game this month was so silly - my top-kek (11%) at 2hp left was Skill Command for 3 dmg (hero power would be 1dmg short). What I wanted to say is that you don't lose that enjoyment of a single game experience when playing competitively. Stories are even greater and more worthy if you put them in competitive context.

    So, once again, congrats for making that first, crucial, the hardest step forward. Next goals you can try: - reach a certain Legend rank; - reach 11x stars reward;- try reaching legend in Wild; - reach Legend with a worse deck...

    Your Rogue list consists of a silly, random card - Plague. That's a tech card, a hate card. Those cards are usually not proactive and don't do anything for your game plan. If a deck isn't good on its own, then nothing will improve it by much, such cards will usually make the deck only more cumbersome. These cards shine is some games, but are dead (losing you games) in all others. We are biased to see that, but more important is to see what's not happening, than only what's happening. Drawn win-rate of Plague is bad, only Scimitar has worse. Other lists play Jandice and Deadly Poisons instead of those. 

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.