Hearthpwn

So is this set going to be like the Injustice League but with Hearthstone Villains? Not sure why but that is the vibe I'm getting.

It has been like that for as long as I remember honestly.

Quote from The_Quicksand >>

It's like asking "How does MTG allow cards like Time Walk or Ancestral Recall exist?"

Nobody cares enough to change or ban long forgotten, rotated out cards.

 I agree that this is not the place for this discussion but I disagree with you saying that Barnes is long forgotten. Anyone playing Wild knows him. With or without the stupid "no one cares about wild" comments.

I think that if you play wild it is worth having. A lot of solid cards and even if not all of them are competitive, not many are strictly bad. It does have to do with how you play though since I got them all with gold over time just because some fit into gimmicks I enjoy.

I could totally be wrong on this, but I wanted some opinions on it. Anyone who plays wild knows that Even Shaman is a common deck there, and that it is likely considered on the best decks available there. I think the deck as a whole could use some balancing but in my opinion Thing from Below is the main problem of the deck. To make a small comparison this card in that deck is very similar to a card that was nerfed in the past called Corridor Creeper. The only difference now is that it has taunt, it only works in Shaman and it can be played without the enemy clearing your board in the past. I could be wrong on this, hence why I made this thread. I'd like some opinions on the subject. Anyone else think that Thing from Below offers too much tempo and board protection? Should this be on the hit list for those rare wild nerfs?

I don't even care if it is strong. As people often forget there are situations where even a weak deck is an unhealthy one. The fact that you have a deck completely based on drawing specific cards, that cannot function in ANY way without said cards, is an issue in itself because it creates a polarized situation of extreme high rolls or complete flops. That said it is also true that Big Priest is an absolute auto piloting deck, you completely ignore the enemy game plan when playing it since the sole purpose is to put your minions out on the board whether the enemy is Aggro or OTK.

I feel it is at least worth mentioning Drakonid Operative. 

Because ramp is still a vital theme for Druid and both are likely still usable if the deck needs ramp badly enough.

I agree but wish that if they wanted weaker hero cards they would just nerf the offenders. Otherwise the choices in wild will be rather few. That said this isn't strictly worse than Deathstalker Rexxar by a long shot.

I agree with everything you said besides the last part. That said this can go in a deck that just runs solid spells and doesn't need to be in a spell hunter deck.

Too bad wild mode is in this really bad state at the moment

Quote from LucasPassado >>

Quote from xOwleyex >>

Hello!!

 Dude, it's ridiculous how they print the same card for another class with the same mana cost but WAY better. 

 I don't know if I would say it is WAY better. The lifesteal mechanic is more impactful for warlock than it is in priest.

Yeah the weakest of the four, but Mage is the only savior class that also has access to Kazakus. Definitely a great board-clear for existing wild Reno Mage, but I don't think it will make it into standard with card pool being so small.

jesus whats up with these new paladin cards, cant we get control paladin support? token/aggro paladin is like the most boring archetype and the most annoying to play against

They literally just changed a classic card that has been around forever. They've done that A LOT. I'm not saying that they nerf the card in anyway, but they could change the way the cost is recognized once it is played for lower mana.

Still no nerfs to BIG PRIEST. F*CK YOU BLIZZARD

Nah. You're wrong. It's not a bummer.

You actually weren't able to disenchant adventure cards until standard came out...