Would this count? Do you have to use a specific/special background for the card?
There is stitched card option on hearthcards for that...
1
Would this count? Do you have to use a specific/special background for the card?
There is stitched card option on hearthcards for that...
4
I´m so sad that priest hasn´t got a single dragon...
2
My entries (my cards from the 3 expansions in a chronological order):
As it stands above, the cards highlight different thematics or/and keywords from Teknician's Year of the Gryphon.
Gadgetzan Holiday
- In Teknician's expansion Rogue is marked as the coin class, so I decided to give it some support (and I also enhanced miracle rogue in wild cuz' of the rotation of
Gadgetzan Auctioneer
). Since we are professional assassins, people want to hire us for our services and for every target we kill we get rewarded. And if you remember MSoG, we know that the biggest and most wanted criminals live in that city.
Flavour text - Normally people here would pay you with Counterfeit Coins, but seeing how cold-bloodedly you stab others with that dagger, they decided to treat you like a VIP.
G'Huun's Devotee
- This is how
G'Huun
looks like in the Blood of the Zandalari expansion. I wanted to make a card, that depicts Ritualists sacrificing their own life, in order to summon an ancient monstrosity. If you wonder how people will get two Devotees on the board - well, there are cards like
Faceless Manipulator
or others like
Serrated Tooth
,
Rocket Boots
,
Houndmaster Shaw
that allow minions with sacrifice to trigger their effects immediately.
Flavour text - Damn, I forgot how the ritual chant goes. Uhm... ARISE, MEGA ULTRA WORM.
Well-Fed
Orc
- I wanted to make a flavourful minion around the "If you spent all your Mana last turn" effect and something with positioning conditions. I purposely gave it weak stats, because I feared its power in Even decks. Don't forget that the word "enemies" includes heroes as well, so this could be either used to deal 4 damage to 1 or 2 minions (taunts) or to injure the opponent 's face (
Nightblade
). Due to this flexibility I had to make it fairer (+ we all know how easily even decks use all of their mana in one turn due to their 1-cost hero powers).
Flavour text - Trust me, you don't want to stay near him when he eats. His burp is worse than his bite.
[edit] Big thanks to Wailor and to Thezzy for giving me their feedback on my cards.
11
I'm working on restoring posts. I wouldn't expect the same from other network sites, the functionality isn't baked in. Keep that in mind the next time someone says I don't care about everyone here, because I could be spending my Sunday playing games instead.
This is going to be a mess to get going, but it will be done for users who have requested their name back via our nickname change thread first.
If your name is not in the table below, don't worry, you'll be added provided you requested a nickname change in the nick name change thread. Other people not on the list can respond to this post or PM me.
Kovachut | Yes |
TheFFsage | Yes |
ilja615 | Yes |
Vexling | Yes |
RavenSunHP | Yes |
Inconspicuosaurus | Yes |
Guestenye | Yes |
Horkinger | Yes |
tulioo90 | Yes |
Patchessthepirate | Yes |
mungo2613 | Yes |
Wazabii | Yes |
Peppec | Yes |
Knudsen89 | Yes |
aQrator | Yes |
block1618 | Yes |
terradda | Yes |
Dovakin2 | Yes |
JN204GT | Yes |
Reachground | Yes |
m0h1 | Yes |
Eddiemon | Yes |
Giulio64 | Yes |
Teuton | Yes |
dragonmaster397 | Yes |
30Roman | Yes |
Malygoa | Yes |
Alasth0rX | Yes |
ZioSchmidt | Yes |
Leolph | Yes |
mandelised | Yes |
Lambda | Yes |
ThesosHS | Yes |
theRealSmarts | Yes |
Gidu | Yes |
urborg_hs | Yes |
MetalPriest | Yes |
Komos | Yes |
xilk | Yes |
MasterRiki | Yes |
PasovecXVI | Yes |
randommerryman | Yes |
ZamperHs | Yes |
Volodim | Yes |
Joopiter | Yes |
andrzejszut78 | Yes |
Hodja | Yes |
KTimmy | Yes |
kreeox | Yes |
HyperOrange | Yes |
Bebok | Yes |
Bengalaas | Yes |
Bluelights | Yes |
McSorley78 | Yes |
Maroseeek | Yes |
NiUG | Yes |
DrBaator | Yes |
IceBlock | Yes |
ElSabidon | Yes |
Jimmare | Yes |
Skeeba | Yes |
ArgentumEmperio | Yes |
mungo2613 | Yes |
Banner_hs | Yes |
MrUncreative | Yes |
Shagohod | Yes |
venomdrench | Yes |
Unknown27 | Yes |
LittleOgre | Yes |
ForPeL | Yes |
LilianVoss | Yes |
SgtMathias | Yes |
Martin | Yes |
Paradigm | Yes |
Syndicate | Yes |
Thezzy | Yes |
Shadow | Yes |
TheDuchy | Yes |
Mr_FatPack | Yes |
H3llstroke | Yes |
Huley96 | Yes |
Kaiza | Yes |
ChibHormones | Yes |
Angelo_USA | Yes |
Siegfrieddo | Yes |
thazud | Yes |
sevpa_rox | Yes |
Bobblaster | Yes |
JACKINTHEBOX | Yes |
messy0ne | Yes |
Targin | Yes |
FieselFitz | Yes |
SgtJamesDoakes | Yes |
Gilbie | Yes |
Gagani13 | Yes |
KickMachine | Yes |
FieselFitz | Yes |
Ascaron | Yes |
Hieii | Yes |
GutsHS | Yes |
SuperAga | Yes |
Magic Oriole | Yes |
Provataki | Yes |
Tumbleweedovski | Yes |
Davaretta | Yes |
Casomoon | Yes |
Twitchy | Yes |
Ace100ace200 | Yes |
BillieTorso | Yes |
Doomer_22 | Yes |
114
Holy actual fuck. The wording this expansion is on another level of retardedness. Fuck. Seriously team 5...how can they be so fucking inconsistent. 'This', 'Someone else', the Discover and draw confusion of Masters Call, the summon effect of Totemic Smash and the bug of Ice Walker with the mage spirit. I can guarantee this will confuse the average player . And that's just this expansion.
Their inconsitencies in wording is a real pet peeve of mine. Love the game been playing since beta, not gonna quit over this, but fuck me sideways.
Fuck.
0
I just want to add that playing with this deck is SUCH FUN
░░░░░░░░░▄░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▄░░░░
░░░░░░░░▌▒█░░░░░░░░░░░▄▀▒▌░░░
░░░░░░░░▌▒▒█░░░░░░░░▄▀▒▒▒▐░░░
░░░░░░░▐▄▀▒▒▀▀▀▀▄▄▄▀▒▒▒▒▒▐░░░
░░░░░▄▄▀▒░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒█▒▒▄█▒▐░░░
░░░▄▀▒▒▒░░░▒▒▒░░░▒▒▒▀██▀▒▌░░░
░░▐▒▒▒▄▄▒▒▒▒░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▀▄▒▒▌░░
░░▌░░▌█▀▒▒▒▒▒▄▀█▄▒▒▒▒▒▒▒█▒▐░░
░▐░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▌██▀▒▒░░░▒▒▒▀▄▌░
░▌░▒▄██▄▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░░░▒▒▒▒▌░
▀▒▀▐▄█▄█▌▄░▀▒▒░░░░░░░░░░▒▒▒▐░
▐▒▒▐▀▐▀▒░▄▄▒▄▒▒▒▒▒▒░▒░▒░▒▒▒▒▌
▐▒▒▒▀▀▄▄▒▒▒▄▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░▒░▒░▒▒▐░
░▌▒▒▒▒▒▒▀▀▀▒▒▒▒▒▒░▒░▒░▒░▒▒▒▌░
░▐▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░▒░▒░▒▒▄▒▒▐░░
░░▀▄▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░▒░▒░▒▄▒▒▒▒▌░░
░░░░▀▄▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▄▄▄▀▒▒▒▒▄▀░░░
░░░░░░▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀▀▒▒▒▒▒▄▄▀░░░░░
░░░░░░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▀▀░░░░░░░░<code></code>
1
Well Met! Really original and cool idea for a deck specially for someone who wants to play with a non-meta deck! If you are interested in watching a video where i explain my thought process of every move that im doing you can check this out. I hope that you will learn something new ;)
Click on the buttons to change the PopCard background.
Click on the button to hide or unhide popcard elements.
2
"Mannoroth works best from the behind the scenes. Just ask Gul'Dan."
1
Last one for HearthPwn!
3
HearthPwn Card Design: Endgame!
*cue Avenger music*
2
But...but....my daily routine! Noes!
4
"Also known as the Queen of Thorns."
4
The buffs Blizzard are providing have nothing to do with this subject. The buffs aren't aimed at fixing problematic cards, they're aimed at pushing underused cards to the front so they'll see more play.
When a specific card is problematic, it is FAR easier and less dangerous to nerf that one card. If you start buffing other cards instead trying to fix the problem, you get the following issues:
First off, which cards do you buff? Let's say Omega Devastator is problematic (ok it is :P) but Blizzard doesn't want to nerf it but buff something else instead. What the hell do you buff instead? E.M.P. Operative? That's still an extremely specific tech card and affects ALL mechs, not just Omega Devastator. What else do you buff? A lot of cards don't have specific counters.
Secondly, buffing a card has far wider reaching effects than just nerfing the problematic card itself. The card that gets buffed could very well become problematic itself. Or push a deck/meta out of existence that didn't have any issues. Say that you wanted to buff against Skull of the Man'ari so you buff all the weapon removal cards. Suddenly everyone and their Mr. Bigglesworth are playing weapon removal. Warrior, Paladin and Rogue are all heavily impacted by such a change. And why? To balance against a Warlock weapon. Isn't it far better to just nerf Skull of the Man'ari?
Nerfs are the way to go when a specific card gets too powerful. The nerf can target that card and that card only. Now I'll grant you that Blizzard has a tendency to use a sledge hammer rather than a scalpel to nerf some of their cards but nerfing is still the way to go.
Buffing cards should be reserved for improving cards that no-one is playing for the simple reason that they either outright suck, are rarely seeing play due to being mostly a niche card or because they have no place/viability in any deck. And so far the buffs Blizzard has provided seem to follow that quite well. I doubt a 5 mana Luna's Pocket Galaxy is suddenly going to destroy the meta, but players will be motivated to try and put it in a deck.
Hopefully Blizzard will recieve a lot of positive feedback from the buffs and will consider doing more buffing of weak/underused cards in the future.
2
My first idea:
Thoughts?
3
Think this is going to be pretty good with Summoning Portal as well.
10
This compensates for the GoT ending pretty well!
2
Yeah I saw that a lot as well. Pretty funny.
Oh well, they can always make a new throne.
Here's my suggestion: