Also, everybody here seems to be under the impression that every Control Warrior game would be versus Warlock. Even if Control Warrior's matchup against Controllock is bad, there's still 9 classes OTHER than Warlock that exist and see some amount of play. "Control can't exist if Tickatus exists" is an almost insane - absolutist - statement that goes contrary to how card games even work. A deck being the best of its kind doesn't preclude other decks of its kind from existing. And the amount of nuance that could go into playing the Control Warrior mirror, or against any other class (nuance which I thought Control players would be excited about since they get to wrinkle their brains while they play Hearthstone) is totally lost because Tickatus has everybody so scared to even consider other control options.
Even if a change in approach is required to deal with Tickatus, which I've already talked about, it wouldn't be a variant on the deck itself, it would just be how you play the matchup. Every matchup requires a different approach for most decks.
If anything, and people have mentioned this already, Lord Juraxxus is the far bigger issue for Control matchups. 2 mana for a 6/6 every turn is a far larger issue than Tick could impose, one that Warrior doesn't have the card generation to deal with for long if the game hits fatigue. Maybe we'll get some Dead Man's Hand retrain or something in the mini set, Blizzard is more aware than we think of things like this, they're just never preemptive.