Hearthpwn

I agree, their tierlist is horrible, but you can't expect all article writers to actually be good at the game, so oh well

I finished last season at Rank 79 Wild legend using this deck and my Murloc shaman only. I haven't played at all this season due to schedule issues but I'd bet I could hit rank 5 with it in a day and legend in a few more. Good luck!

I don't like shaman, but you don't come close to speaking for the community

Yea sure a lot of the cards seem nice and flavorful to you in theory, but you have a very poor view of how things would pan out in reality. You don't know how the actual balance of the cards will turn out, furthermore you don't know if an increasingly complicated card pool will thin the population by becoming to difficult for new players to learn, and a shrinking population is certainly not what the game needs. The point is, a lot more goes into the decisions and direction of the game than the silly little comparison you made, and you should try to understand that

I wish I had more than one downvote for this suggestion

2 stones is definitely necessary, I would cut Medivh before cutting a stone as the Barnes synergy is great and there are more games where stone + innervate + spells gets you the win than innervate + Medivh into spells next turn. Medivh is great against control and the stone is better suited for beating midrange and Agro which is the meta of the day

Added mulligan strats yesterday. Back to rank 6 with it this season after 1 day of trying, maybe it will keep my interest this season and I'll hit legend with it

Hey man I appreciate the positive feedback, I'll take some time today to add mulligan info since people are still giving the deck some play time and it is something I intended to do a month ago

Good and fun, but I will use this opportunity to report that I didn't hit legend with it last season, the highest I hit was rank 3. I probably could have gone higher if I didn't get lured into playing some of Kibler's rediculous decks instead, but I might give this deck another shot once Standard comes out and some of the tougher match ups are softened

Still waiting on that guide zZz. Deck looks pretty awesome but I'd like to see someone pilot it before I smash my head against the wall trying it out

Hey Rage,

I have been running my own version of this deck for several months now after watching you play it, and I have a couple of questions about where the list has started to deviate from my own.

First, I find that 2 duplicates is much better than 2 ice blocks, there are too many useful duplicate targets in the deck and messing up duplicate if it comes off of a scientist too early can cost you a game if you don't have a back-up, and I can't remember ever winning a game where my opponent popped 2 ice blocks anyways.

I am pretty surprised you cut loatheb, as duplicate/echo loatheb is my most frequent win condition these days. Every deck uses spells in their finishers, and it is pretty easy to play 5-6 loathebs a game with this list, completely shutting down druid combos, warlock combos etc., buying you multiple turns while slowly filling the board with 5/5s. I think Loatheb is a better include than Reno but I'd be interested to hear why you disagree. I have not dropped a game in a tournament in the last 3 months with the deck, so it is working for me about as well as I could hope, are your changes more gear towards what you are seeing on ladder? Thanks

Tried it. This deck is awful. It is a combo deck with no card draw, as you would expect it only has a remote chance to win even when you get a god draw. Don't listen to this troll