Acting like you won't get Bomb Squad
- TallStranger
- Registered User
-
Member for 6 years, 9 months, and 25 days
Last active Tue, Mar, 21 2023 21:24:47 -
- 2
- 22
- 47
- 0 Followers
- 370 Total Posts
- 523 Thanks
-
5
Thanatos2k posted a message on New Neutral Epic Card Revealed - Unpopular Has-BeenPosted in: News -
5
DatMageDoe posted a message on New Neutral Epic Card Revealed - Unpopular Has-BeenPosted in: NewsNo, the actual question is Blood Herald, Furbolg Mossbinder, or Former Champ
-
11
Suikiele posted a message on Wild Summit at Blizzard about Wild Format Balance - Balance Changes Soon?Posted in: NewsI keep buying packs / expansions / minisets and primarily play this game for that mode. If it was shut down, that'd literally be the moment I was done with this game (as BGs have zero appeal to me and Standard is generally boring AF). Wild players asking for some quality of life changes is a rational thing to expect from fans of the format, and any changes would not affect Standard players in any way. What I don't get is people that don't play the format constantly piping up.
-
1
TheSpunYarn posted a message on DK Isn't Weak, The Old Meta Is Too StrongPosted in: General DiscussionPlease someone tell me, this 🤡 is not for real ?
So ur showing us a example with 300 Games Samplesize, but not enough you didn't even bother to specify which rank, just the general / all ranks setting.
How did this Amateur who doesn't even know how to navigate HSreplay properly become a Moderator in here ? Yuck.
Blood DK is unplayable, let me repeat. Un-play-able at Legend if you want to climb, without having to amass enough sample size that would require like 12 hours a day in front of your computer, trying to break even.
Warlock and Druid are the only playable classes right now if you plan to rank really high. But why listen to someone who was among the best 200 Hearthstone players in Europe just last month, when you can just troll and defend your nons as a Moderator, right ?
Instead of attempting to reach Legend rank for the first time, why don't you just go ahead, make good use of those pOwErS - ban me, because I'am obviously mocking you... and having a BLAST with it. lul.VERSUS
Honestly impressive that they taught an ill-mannered toddler to type.
-
1
Scorpyon posted a message on Not going "GG Go Next" has to be my biggest pet peeve.Posted in: General DiscussionI must be getting slow in my old age.
What is "GG GO Next"?
lol. Maybe it's just cos it's Monday... -
2
Beatsz posted a message on New Mage Legendary Card Revealed - Grand Magister RommathPosted in: NewsMy god you're like a Hearthstone version of a flat earther, relax already.
-
13
MyDude33 posted a message on Patch 24.6 Preview - Big 1st of November Announcement Confirmed, Hallow's End, Battlegrounds Event, Loaning Decks & MorePosted in: NewsI mean it's just cosmetics. That is literally the most inane thing you can get upset about. Maybe go outside and interact with real people a little more.
-
11
Makeleth posted a message on Masters Tour: Maw & Disorder - Survival Guide - With Drops!Posted in: NewsSo when there's no packs you whine and when there are free packs but "too few" in your eyes you still whine?
Do you want 50 free packs for watching 1 hour of stream to be satisfied?
-
2
FortyDust posted a message on All New Paladin Cards RevealedPosted in: NewsOoh, look at the edgelord calling it racist paladin.
-
3
fjl93 posted a message on Standard Balance Changes Coming Soon - Might Include Neutral Cards!Posted in: NewsThe card is healthy. But it's not fun to play against. That's just how disruption works. Disruption is never fun for the one that doesn't plays it.
I agree with @FortyDust, having a way of punishing 1-wincon decks is healthy. What counter do you have against Denatrius then, other than Sm0rC? What I think it's unhealthy is that these kind of decks the only possible counter is going full agro, which is basically how Hearthstone has ever worked before cards like this.
- To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
1
I wonder, if you stole/ copied this from your opponent, would you get a copy of their cards? I assume so, but HS mechanics don't always make sense....
2
Nice that they're addressing the signature card issue, but does anyone have any idea how much we'll get for dusting them?
5
Yes, because we all know just how perfectly balanced Standard is. There's never, in the history of Standard, been idiotic, broken, unfun decks to play against. It's a frickin paradise.
Once again, the anti-Wild crowd spews out its petty nonsense.
1
I enjoy stomping on obnoxious mill rogues who kindly draw cards for me so that I can run them down really quickly. I enjoy watching their health go bye-bye. Have a nice day.
9
That's absurd. It does no harm to "the brand" (whatever the hell that means) to allow people to continue to use the cards they paid dearly for (either in money or time). If anything, forcing people to dust their cards (at such a discount) is more likely to damage Blizzard's reputation than reforming it.
I swear, the petty hatred for Wild on this forum is so f-ing tiresome. The Wild fanbase may not be huge, but (believe it or not) some people really enjoy it. I personally think Battleground is moronic: an utter waste of time. But I'm mature enough to understand that other people enjoy it, so I don't say offensive garbage like that.
1
That's okay: I generated a couple others from Hematurge!!
2
I've thought the same thing for a long time. There are absolutely certain combos of cards that simply break wild. But allowing Switcheroo as long as Inner Fire was off the table seems reasonable.
The other option I can see is permanently retiring certain cards. Blizzard has already banned 5 cards, so the precedent is already set. This is, in my mind, less likely because a) Blizzard would have to give us full dust value if it perma-killed these cards; and b) more importantly, it would lead to countless "ban this" demands from the player base.
2
It feels even better to Patchwerk my opponent's Xyrella, the Sanctified!
3
Dear lord, not again. OP, you are either:
1. A troll, looking to start a food fight by posting something he knows is going to get people riled up; or
2. A conspiracy nut who is resurrecting the "Blizzard is secretly controlling your win/ loss record in order to blah, blah, blah" nonsense. If this were being done to everyone playing implock, it would be obvious immediately to sites like HSReplay, which track all this, and would lead to a massive scandal. Since that hasn't happened, the only logical answer is that Blizzard is after you. Sorry, dude, but I doubt you're that important. OR
3. (Best option) You, like many people, are a victim of confirmation bias.
If option 3, get a deck tracker (or do a serious study tracking your opening hand). If option 1, congrats, you got what you wanted. If option 2, seek professional help.
1
And, yet, you continue to post here, even after you claimed to have stopped playing the game.