Rallying Blade makes no sense here. You're losing value. You're playing it as a much worse Fiery War Axe, and you get no value out of the battle cry. May as well play Sword of Justice instead.
If it draws you a 1 or 2 mana card, it's a flop. Therefore, it's only useful in control shaman decks, which are few and far between atm.
Well, then you spent 3 to draw a card AND play it for free.
Are you really suggesting that is a good thing? Why would you pay 3 mana for drawing a 2 mana card and playing it for "free" (which is not true, since you already used 3 mana), when you can just play the same card for only 2 mana? Far Sight has no place in aggro decks that run a lot of low cost minions dude, but it is useful in control and combo decks.
It's still deck thinning, and current Shaman meta decks have plenty of higher cost cards/combos.It's still a luck based thing to do. Like saying your opponent has a full board and hoping that your knife juggler juggles 5 hits on the same creature.
The fact Far sight never saw any love is bugging me, to say the least. Okay you have the risk to have a 1/2 mana, but it's making your deck 28 card based instead of 30, which can only be good in an Aggro scheme.
I agree, I think it has potential, but is currently outclasses, especially with it being an epic. Maybe if it were 2 cost instead? Or even Higher cost but had a draw 2 effect instead.
1
I don't get it? Is this like a meme deck or something?
3
Yeah because your two games of playing bad matters to his win-rate. Makes sense.
-3
The actual sub for Wickerflame Burnbristle is a new deck.
-4
Rallying Blade makes no sense here. You're losing value. You're playing it as a much worse Fiery War Axe, and you get no value out of the battle cry. May as well play Sword of Justice instead.
0
0
0
0
0
As most people know, there is a card called Far Sight in the Shaman class.
Why is this not a viable card? You draw one for 3 cost, then reduce the card you drew by 3.
The pros I can see for running this at 1 or 2 would be:
1) You get a card draw, effectively making your deck a 28 or 29 card deck.
2) Reduced cost on what ever you draw, which could be a top deck win for 3 cost less.
Now, I understand there are other card draws that could work better as combos. I.E Trogg + Ancestral Knowledge.
Any opinions?
0
Buy packs, or save it for arena (which if you do well is more beneficial)
0
Now for the real reason OP made this post. Why wild is better than standard? Probably because he got rekt by every deck that's good.
2
0
12
1
Astonishing.