Hearthpwn

Quote from SchruteBucks >>

Trying to rank up.  opponents getting perfect draws every game not to mention being shit matchups for my deck.  thanks blizzard.

Yes they will return.

Please add me so that i can spectate your awesomeness!

Quote from FunKaliTy >>

How about....Unstable Portal giving you Malygos + Arcane Blast + Arcane Blast + Forbidden Flame....meh 29 dmg...so close! :P

Quote from niewadzi >>

Nope, in the one mana minions brawl you could play alex,rag,innervate faceless on rag

 There we go! I was sure I remembered some T1 kill going first in that Brawl as well ;)

So how will we know which is the best deck? There's no way to test it.

Quote from Maukiepaukie >>

Quote from Tahladnas >>

Quote from Maukiepaukie >>

Right now the popular BrokeBack aggro decks are: Shaman (midrange also counts), pirate warrior and zoolock. Now in the forums I've noticed there are several aggro players:

1. The ones that apparently don't play a card game to think turns through, but prefer just winning. These people somehow get satisfaction from undeserved wins in a virtual card game.

2. The delusional ones: These people either have talked themselves into believing these decks takes skill, or pretend the deck takes skill because it's all they can play. The retarded ones also belong in this category: Even aggro decks require alot of thought for these guys, so it's nice Blizzard has taken the mentally disabled into account.

3: The poor ones: These people don't have the money to play a good slow-paced deck, so play aggro. This, however, does not explain how they can enjoy HS playing aggro, because I'd honestly rather play no deck than only aggro. In order to belong to the poor ones you also have to belong to another category, because it lacks an explanation why you enjoy the game.

4: The Jacks-of-all-trades: These people play every deck there is, I sort of belong in this category with the exception of aggro. To belong to this group you have to either have a good reason to play every deck (such as you want to learn how decks work), or belong to another category.

5: The ''poor victims'' :'( : The people that say ''If you can't cure cancer, get cancer'' a poor excuse in my opinion. Control/slow decks are still viable in my opinion, aggro is just the easy way out.

6: The busy ones: The people that only have a tiny bit of time everyday. It is very unlikely that you don't have half an hour tops to play a game of HS every day, but I can understand wanting to play several games/do your quests. These people often belong in category 7 aswell. These people are often rank 15+ (not that that is a bad thing).

7: The casual ones: The people that don't feel like thinking too much, and just want a simple, straightforward game to do something. Like those games that require you to tap on stuff to get coins that you can buy more stuff with. These people are often rank 15+ (not that that is a bad thing) and often belong in category 6 aswell, because they are already so busy they don't want to do more thinking.

Wow, such an extensive list. Here's my list of different type of Cuntrol Players:

1. The salty one: The one who always lose to aggro deck and come to the forums to complain.

 Found the aggro player. FYI: I have a great winrate against aggro with most of my decks. Anyway, what kind of aggro player would you define yourself as? My guess is 1/2.

Dust it. It is not seeing any play now, and it hasn't seen any play since last year. He is one of those cards that will never fit the meta.

Doomhammer + Double Rockbiter.

Thank you for the info. Also, Earth is round.

Quote from MvonTzeskagrad >>

If you mean "not playing at all and then applying a simple combo in order to burn one single card" is outplaying, then yes, he did. But that's not what I think outplaying is (wich is "do something that turns the board in your favor / lethals and requires good setting up"). Don't act like a smart-ass now. That "outplay" is exactly the same kind as "oh, look, low attack minion, eat this kodo/cabal!"

Only difference is that it had to cost one of the two pieces of the win condition against fatigue non-priest... because it was the only card between 18 that it could really hurt me to discard (I drew C'Thun before). And well, I'll better stop, because now I'm starting to feel annoyed.

Just because the meta is full of aggro, doesn't mean you can't play any deck you want. Was there an error message saying "Too many aggro decks in the meta, your deck is not allowed to be played"?

If you want your opponent to not kill you before you try out whatever Turn 10 Wisp Of The Old Gods or Cenarius combo, maybe you should try playing against the AI.

Playing against real players will queue you with players who, you know, actually want to win.

Quote from Maukiepaukie >>

Right now the popular BrokeBack aggro decks are: Shaman (midrange also counts), pirate warrior and zoolock. Now in the forums I've noticed there are several aggro players:

1. The ones that apparently don't play a card game to think turns through, but prefer just winning. These people somehow get satisfaction from undeserved wins in a virtual card game.

2. The delusional ones: These people either have talked themselves into believing these decks takes skill, or pretend the deck takes skill because it's all they can play. The retarded ones also belong in this category: Even aggro decks require alot of thought for these guys, so it's nice Blizzard has taken the mentally disabled into account.

3: The poor ones: These people don't have the money to play a good slow-paced deck, so play aggro. This, however, does not explain how they can enjoy HS playing aggro, because I'd honestly rather play no deck than only aggro. In order to belong to the poor ones you also have to belong to another category, because it lacks an explanation why you enjoy the game.

4: The Jacks-of-all-trades: These people play every deck there is, I sort of belong in this category with the exception of aggro. To belong to this group you have to either have a good reason to play every deck (such as you want to learn how decks work), or belong to another category.

5: The ''poor victims'' :'( : The people that say ''If you can't cure cancer, get cancer'' a poor excuse in my opinion. Control/slow decks are still viable in my opinion, aggro is just the easy way out.

6: The busy ones: The people that only have a tiny bit of time everyday. It is very unlikely that you don't have half an hour tops to play a game of HS every day, but I can understand wanting to play several games/do your quests. These people often belong in category 7 aswell. These people are often rank 15+ (not that that is a bad thing).

7: The casual ones: The people that don't feel like thinking too much, and just want a simple, straightforward game to do something. Like those games that require you to tap on stuff to get coins that you can buy more stuff with. These people are often rank 15+ (not that that is a bad thing) and often belong in category 6 aswell, because they are already so busy they don't want to do more thinking.

Quote from Duckular1 >>

Playing in wild... the secret paladin drops 2 secrets and I eat them. He auto quits on turn 4. Scum that they are.

Quote from Worroseht >>

i dream of the day Tunnel Trogg rotates out and Doomhammer gets thrown in the dark pit where it belongs ...

Sap doesn't win you the game within 1 or 2 turns after playing it. It creates a domino effect by giving the user a slight tempo edge, which will result in a final outcome (bursting him with leeroy for exact lethal) that would be impossible if Sap wasn't used 5 turns ago.