-
- Syncesta
- Registered User
-
Member for 10 years, 10 months, and 28 days
Last active Sun, Sep, 17 2023 08:18:19 -
- 9
- 44
- 101
- 0 Followers
- 406 Total Posts
- 932 Thanks
⚙
Learn More
Cosmetics
Related Cards
Card Pools
✕
×
PopCard Settings
Click on the buttons to change the PopCard background.
Elements settings
Click on the button to hide or unhide popcard elements.
2
The amount of people who are wrong about this is amazing.
0
Dunno how it happened but the word 'effective' snuck into your sentence there....
-7
In what possible way is this better than Earthen Ring Farseer?
Edit:
I guess its existence might buy Priest a bit more time vs Pirate Warrior?
0
Can't see them giving a character with so much lore tied to them to just one class. Particularly a class that already has Bolvar both before and after The Lich King is defeated.
My guess is that the Lich King will be more akin to Justicar Trueheartt and empowers your hero power or changes it to something else - probably ghoul relate to interact with those generators. Something based on the WoW fight itself as we've seen all the key elements of that raid more or less in cards like Professor Putricide, Rotface, Blood-Queen Lana'thel and the Blood Princes
0
0
People who don't play Pirate Warrior because it's toxic and requires no real interaction with the nuanced complexities of the game are worse than people that play Pirate Warrior because it's toxic and requires no real interaction with the nuanced complexities of the game?
Is that statement based on data too?
1
0
Give me some actual data rather than conjecture that justifies your stance as being more informed/valid than the rest of us?
1
You missed off 'Yes but I totally regret it' as an option.
0
0
Have you ever had Dirty Rat pull a minion from your hand and then immediately destroyed? If the stars align and your opponent manages it with Dirty Rat & Doomsayer on turn 4, pulls your Alexstrasza and you can't remove the Doomsayer it feels bad, right? How often does that happen? Close to never right? Why?
Because who really hangs on to late game cards? That only happens if you drew it from your deck in the early game and you don't have an answer to Doomsayer, which sucks for you anyway. That also has to happen at the same time that they also mulligan'd/drew into Dirty Rat & Doomsayer, had the guts to play the combo for 4 mana and lose the Dirty Rat in the process.
This does that for one card, which is massive, true, but unlikely, as you said.
You then seem to argue that therefore it's bad.
I'll happily destroy one of your cards leaving a 2/3 body for 2 mana compared to trying to fish a minion with Dirty Rat and probably give you the game in the process. I don't care what the card is, because if you've included it in your deck, you've excluded something else for a reason (I'm talking here about the few players that don't copy paste Pirate Warrior)
0
It's so bad that it has to be good. Consider all the variants of this that they surely tested first before they printed this.
It probably started its life as a 4/6 taunt for 3 mana:
Compared with Bloodhoof Brave it would have been a natural minion overstat for Shaman + overload as payment for playing this earlier.During testing it wrecked everything as a 2 of with mid - lategame viability where overload doesn't hurt as much a good chunk of the time.
This will be cancer for anything that isn't priest I predict on that basis.
0
Well at least it's not Crackle
1
I need to talk to my therapist about this place. You guys are always so quick to denounce interesting cards that force even the slightest element of decision making or, heaven forbid, ingenuity over netdecking. I can so clearly imagine all the people who shout and scream about cards like this being bad bashing each other over the head with Prenerf Eaglehorn or Doomhammer+prenerf Rockbiter Weapon, drawing cave paintings of prenerf Undertaker whilst touching themselves reminiscing about a time before Golakka Crawler.
0
To clarify, Highlander decks are what you might call Reno decks where powerful card effects are dependent on an absence, rather than the presence, of cards within a decklist. E.g. Reno, the Princes etc...