Hearthpwn

Looks like a solid deck, I don't mind having lots of single copies of cards in my decks. That being said the only cards I don't really get would be the elven archers. What's their purpose in the deck? Love them in some decks I just don't see how they are supposed to be used in this. Maybe swap for argent squires if you still want 1 drops?

Good pick with Cairne, though I think Bloodmage thalnos would have been a good pick as well since the first real "expansion" of the card pool is going to focus heavily on deathrattle. We obviously don't know specifics yet but one can assume that those cards with gel really well with the new cards coming out of Naxx.

I know a lot of people that have struggled to find a use for far sight. The only kind of deck I can see it really working in is like a miracle shaman type deck. Almost using it like a preparation.

Well Idk about DE'ing King Krush or Deathwing since I think there's a use for every card, and I just don't like being inefficient my dust.

But as to what to craft, I'd go with Ragnaros. Just happened to be the 2nd legendary I pulled and it's been such a clutch card over and over. It's a win condition just by itself and can be thrown into almost any deck.

Hey since I downloaded the patch all cards in the crafting mode that are craftable are crazy static now. Really messing with my eyes, anyone else seeing this?

Just tried out a slightly different version since I don't have all the cards. The deck worked out pretty well except for the fact that I had a HORRIBLE starting hand and didnt get any weapons or 2 drops till turn 4. I was going up against a mage and as it went late game he just stalled me out till he pulled pyroblast, had him down to 1 health.

I swapped out slam for cleave since I don't have slam. Do you think Slam is a necessary card? Dropping frothing berserker and cleave on turn 5 really helped to get back in the game after such a bad start.

Quote from Maicoh »

I know it might clutter the screen, but I wish I could of seen the opposing players reaction as their opponent was playing the cards.  Every time it swapped over they'd already had time to process what had been played.

I would of liked 3 vertical sections.  Example during the invitational.  (15%) vertical bar camera of Artosis, 70% vertical bar of the board, (15%) veritcal bar camera of Kripp.  That way you don't ahve to swap between players as they'll always be on screen.  I think it adds a lot to see a reaction to a legendary being dropped, etc.

 

 

I do like this idea if they highlighted the player cam of whoever's board cam was showing. It would cut down on confusion if you started watching mid-game.

I didn't really mind the fact that they switched players screens, It helped to keep track of whose cards were in front of you, if they showed all the cards on one screen someone's would be upside down which would be irritating or they would have to create a side view which is weird. 

The thing that really threw me off was that the board itself kept shifting left and right when they switched players because they kept artosis's player cam on the left side of the screen and kripp's on the right. Example below...

l Art Cam l   Board Cam       l

l Board Cam     l  Krip Cam  l

Having to shift your actual viewpoint left an right was pretty irritating, idk why they didnt just keep the player cam on the same side of the screen and just swap them back and forth.

Is there potential for these matches to be streamed similar to the Innkeeper's invitational? It was incredibly entertaining and informative.

Up till now this deck has been my baby. I used it pretty much exclusively to get up to 3 star diamond. I've changed it slightly along the way as I pulled more cards but it has stayed pretty much the same.

It was actually quite easy to rank up till now, but I've absolutely hit a brick wall at 3 star diamond. 

Thing is it's always seemed to be a patched together deck to me and i never really got how it was so successful up to this point. I have an enrage warrior deck with way better cards that I consider to be clearly better but this deck still seems to outperform it.

Just wondering if you guys have also hit noticeable difficulty spikes along your way up the ladder and if you have any tips on how this deck could improve or if its even viable at that level.

I just got into Beta two days ago and I got Baron Geddon as my first legendary I ended up in a pretty unique situation as a priest playing a paladin. The paladin used Humilty on Geddon effectively making him worthless as a big swinger so me having a decent health advantage, I decided to use him to put a clock on the game. Double divine spirit up to a 1/20, not likely to get through that. I could almost feel my opponent sweating as he watched his life trickle away while I healed and Taunted :) Being new and all just in terms of general play style I've found it works really well sometimes to just slap your bigsticks on the table and say come on try to deal with this.  

http://www.hearthpwn.com/decks/10621-stomping-totems

Seeing as i had ZERO choices for spells through my first 10 picks my deck started to become based around minions with battlecry attack and health buffs that will allow me to utilize my totems very effectively

http://www.hearthpwn.com/deckbuilder/hunter#15:2;22:2;73:1;74:1;76:2;86:2;114:1;163:1;174:1;179:1;210:1;239:2;278:1;304:2;363:2;389:1;407:1;425:1;447:1;553:1;577:1;578:1;614:1;

Beta!