• 2

    posted a message on Face hunter (49-16 in legend 75% WR)

    1 hour and 18 games later...

    72% winrate and 0% fun had. I barely dedicate time to think for the next play. I just dump my hand and win. I faced 5 Warlock players that would have meant 5 auto losses with Control Priest. But thanks to this deck, neither me nor the Warlock players had much fun.

    I faced a couple of other Hunter players with decks almost similar to this and they just spammed emotes right from the start of the game to the finish. I kept wondering how can someone have superiority complex when they didn't even create the deck they are playing.

    Why Blizzard keep rewarding decks that require zero thought process and incentives you to dump your hand as you draw cards while keep punishing decks that do require thought process and holding cards for optimal play? I just want to play Control Priest man... 

    Posted in: Face hunter (49-16 in legend 75% WR)
  • 2

    posted a message on Face hunter (49-16 in legend 75% WR)

    Well, because of Warlocks and Tickatus, I can't enjoy playing control so I have to play this deck so we both can't have fun. How fun!

    Posted in: Face hunter (49-16 in legend 75% WR)
  • 2

    posted a message on It's Nozdormu Day - Every 15th of the Month!

    If you want to discourage people from behaving like a copypasta mindless drones then this isn’t it.

    Seriously, I played like 50 games yesterday and just one, just one player actually made a home brewed deck.

    Posted in: News
  • 10

    posted a message on Balance Changes Coming Next Week - Mage, Paladin, Rogue & Neutral
    Quote from Nepppy >>

    Yall really need to stop whining about tickatus, he isn't the probkem. The problem is warlock's insane removal and healing from the other corruption cards, not tickatus. 

     I am sorry but you can interact and play around Warlock’s removal but you can absolutely not do anything to interact, prevent or play around 5-10 card burn. I played more than my share games as Control vs Tickatus Warlock and I lost a number of them simply because of fatigue.

    Tickatus is a problem card. The people saying it is the removal cards fault are just delusional and probably want to continue their one sided “fun” with Tickatus. A single card shouldn’t be allowed to turn a percentage of games into a single player experience.

    Posted in: News
  • 8

    posted a message on For the Hoard! Card Back + Medivh Are Now Available On The In-Game Shop

    Sometimes I wonder where are all the spenders that buy packs with real money. All I see are people with the same tired old decks that they copy pasted off the net. I ask why they buy packs with real money only to end up using about 30-90 of them playing 1-3 decks. And the rest of the cards that they purchased with real money? where are they? Do they realize that they spent a videogames worth of money to play a small portion of it?

    Yea, anyways, the card back. The majority of people I face have Hakkar's card back. This tells me that they didn't even bother, possibly don't even know that they can change it. I have more faith in people with normal card back than Hakkar's.

    Posted in: News
  • 1

    posted a message on You can no longer insta concede to progress Play 3 games with X, Y and Z Quests
    Quote from noza2004 >>

    *entitlement intensifies*

    Yes, I am entitled to my time and how to use it. You only commented this because I didn't type "I don't like play 3 games with X, Y and Z quests" instead.

    Apart from giving you 1 reroll each day, the quests do not incentives or encourages me to play X, Y and Z classes. If my own card collection and the meta cannot encourage me to play these classes then how should a quest do that? The rant holds true for me for any weekly quest concerning battlegrounds too. 

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on You can no longer insta concede to progress Play 3 games with X, Y and Z Quests
    Quote from Pas >>
    Quote from SpaceTimeDream >>

    As the title says, I cannot just simply insta concede at the start of the match to progress the quest so now like always I have to waste my and opponent's time by roping each turn and hope my opponent have enough brains to kill me quickly.

    *sigh*

     Why you need to rope?

     Because I found that opponents actually play and kill me faster if I appear "afk". If I spam end button they will start solving complex formulas in their heads to solve and figure out which Yugioh move I will pull out of my ass to win. 

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on You can no longer insta concede to progress Play 3 games with X, Y and Z Quests

    As the title says, I cannot just simply insta concede at the start of the match to progress the quest so now like always I have to waste my and opponent's time by roping each turn and hope my opponent have enough brains to kill me quickly.

    *sigh*

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on "If you are bored with standard then play wild" *big sigh*
    Quote from Pizzacats >>
    Quote from Entropy7 >>

    OP is right, wild is unbearable to play  - but still better than the new classic mode.

     Yeah idk why they thought a classic mode would be fun. It’s fun for a few games till you realize the meta is already known and everyone’s playing the same few decks and it will always be people playing those same few decks

    They probably did it because they introduced classic or remade other games.

    You have WoW classic, Warcraft 3 remake, Starcraft HD, Diablo 2 remake is next. So why not Hearthstone too as well while they are at it. 

    Posted in: Wild Format
  • 4

    posted a message on "If you are bored with standard then play wild" *big sigh*

    Well, I played wild until I reached Platinum rank and from there forward all I see are 3 decks, Secret Mage, Zoo Self-Damage Warlock and Resurrect Big Priest.

    All the cards in the world made available and people just netdeck and play 3 decks. Why people buy packs with real money for if they end up using a very small limited pool of them?

    I realize that am probably exaggerating things but playing Wild just proved to be the same as Standard. People netdecking with no promise of experimenting and making their own homebrewed decks. I am curious what happens with the physical TCG, if they too experience netdecking

    Rant over.

    Posted in: Wild Format
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.