Quote from adamcroxton »Quote from adamcroxton »which is better?
playing 10 games and half those games being one class?
or
playing 10 games and nearly playing all classes in the game?
i am going to have to go with the second option.
If you are playing competitively up the ladder than the first is better. You don't handicap the FotM class with longer queue times. If you truly are running into one class over and over than you can much more easily customize a deck to deal with it. I think this is more skillful.
If you want a large variety of opponents than roll in casual. It ebbs and flows with the normal meta but it's MUCH more varied. I don't think we need to punish successful decks with longer queue times.
I don't understand where you get that it would handicap fotm classes. Wait time same no mater what deck you were using. I don't think you were paying much attention. No where in this thread is there abything even resembling handicapping one class with a longer wait time
Lets do an example. Timmy is playing with 10 other people, 5 of which play hunter. He is one of those hunters. After one round of play everyone has played a hunter, so they can't play a hunter again. Timmy has to wait for the other people to finish playing before they will be matched with a hunter again.
Even if the hunters were not evenly distributed in the first round, you still get put into a queue for it. The way it would pan out is if there is a popular class (which there always are) then that class will have to wait longer for a match-up.
1
Play something more respectable than zoo?
But really, you're saying hearthstone is broken because you didn't draw a 1-drop? If you shuffle a deck of playing cards, draw 5, and don't get an Ace, is the deck broken?
1
"Budget"