2
Quote from painkiller789 »You cannot remove the DDD case like that it just means that DDH is twice as likely as the other outcomes...
I believe that all outcomes come with same probability. DDD simply doesn't exist, why would you put it in there if it isn't possible? It's not the same as DDH and it doesn't make DDH twice as likely at all.
Think about it! DD has a 25% chance of happening. What happens next doesn't matter...
2
That is not right. The sequence does matter and both D-D-H and D-D-D (which can not be achieved, so after D-D it's always D-D-H, but the chance of it happening is not 1/7 but 2/8) kill the dragon. The chance of killing it is exactly 50%.
4
Quote from gurkan1346 »The blizzard fanboys in this thread disgusts me. And to the guy saying we bought naxx not because of the cards but for the "experience of the bosses". Thats like going to the hobbit premiere but the movie wont start. So you go to the staff and say you want a refund, but the genius in this thread would be there saying "no you bought the experience of going here, not the movie 11!!"
That might be the worst analogy I've ever seen.
3
Let me tell you about a guy named Mike. Mike is a pretty cool guy. Mike decides that every day on his way to work, he is going to stop by your house and give you 50 dollars. He does this for a month. Then he stops showing up. You see Mike a week later. What do you say to him?
Blizzard generously allows us to disenchant cards that they alter (something they do not have to do). This is still the case in this scenario if you have a golden Undertaker, but since a normal Undertaker is Soulbound, the disenchant feature does not apply. Should we be appreciative that Blizzard still offers the full disenchant value for card changes, or have we become so used to it that we see it as the bare minimum we deserve as we clamor for more?
What the OP is doing here is saying "Hey Mike, $!&@ you".
22
No there shouldn't be anything. UT might get nerfed, but everybody knew since day 1 he had it coming.
+ When you purchase naxx, you don't actually "purchase UT". Maybe it was how you, as a person, considered it. But the truth is, Blizzard sold an adventure, with bosses they designed, dialogues, strategies to develop (or netdeck, same thing), and gave u, after you completed what you bought, an ADVENTURE (as advertized), a reward for each boss + one for each wing.
Purchasing naxx is not purchasing the reward, otherweise you would get the cards as soon as you purchase. Naxx is the adventure itself, the rewards are just little incentives. You feel you bought Naxx for UT only, but that's your own missinterpretation, sorry buddy.
Hope I made myself clear
32
I would also like to receive a refund for every card pack I paid for before they nerfed leeroy jenkins because I paid for quite a few to get the dust to craft him and he is now also borderline unplayable. I agree I shouldn't get a full refund because I got some other nice cards out of those packs and still have a leeroy but at least half of that money should be returned for me because I want something I do not deserve.
1
Glad to hear I can disenchant my gold ones for full value. The animation on them sure is pretty, though.
0
Indeed. The decks that still want to run an aggressive card with deathrattle theme can still do this, all this does is just make Undertaker vulnerable to AoE removal or other removal that it used to not be vulnerable to.
4
About damn time, now it's balanced. Comparable to Mana Wyrm even.
6
Stop complaining about face hunter sucking. You are either misplaying it or drawing poorly.
Click on the buttons to change the PopCard background.
Click on the button to hide or unhide popcard elements.
1
Because in the politically correct stance, all players are equal and every human opponent is a "worthy" opponent.
Even the ones running zoo...
2
What I really wish is that you could greater appreciate your own card backs in game. Currently, in a duel, the only time that you get to look at your own card back is the top half of it on the top card of your deck, and that it just a static image, it isn't even animated. You only really get to see your opponent's card back in its full animated glory.
Really, the only time at all that you can see your own card back in full is when you're opening card packs.
2
Is it possible to create gifs of the card backs for more detail?
2
I demand generating an infinite chain of webspinners!
6
Needs to be updated with a deathrattle for Naxx. XD
1
Me (mage) going against a priest. I have 10 HP, and I just got him down to 9 and the only card in my hand is a pyroblast that I was going to kill him with next turn along with my minions on board. (I had board control) You know what he does?
Mind Vision > Coin > Pyroblast.
I don't play mage anymore...
3
Your legend rating reflects your position in respect to the other legend players, and change after a match is based on your opponent. If you are a higher rank than someone, that means that you are better than them. If you are a lower rank, that means that they are better than you. Ideally, you would just be put in your fitting rank immediately, and never move from it unless your skill level changes. However, this is impossible for the game to know without either intense brain scanning or black magic, so the game has to make approximations of where you belong on the ladder.
You should not be able to beat people who are higher rank than you, so if you do, the system realizes that one of you must not be in the correct ranking position, and shifts the both of you to somewhere that it feels is more appropriate with its new data, hence your rank will rise a lot, but if you beat someone ranked below you, your ranking won't change much, because based on your current higher ranking, you should have beaten them anyway, meaning that you are in the right spot for you. There is, however, the possibility that people who the system had origionally placed below you proved to be more skilled than first thought and surpassed you in rank, resulting in your rank 'dropping' by a bit every once in a while for no obvious reason.
And vise versa for loosing to people above/below you as well.
1
Okay, this is what I can suggest for your deck.
#1) Take out the novice engineers. After the nerf from 2 health to 1 health, novice engineer literally became the paladin hero power. If you don't understand that, it's a 2 mana 1/1 that doesn't use up a card from your hand. Pretty much the only reason that any deck should run novice now is if they have some extremely important combo, and they just want to cycle out cards from their deck until they can draw that combo. You deck isn't one of these. Just using your hero power does the same thing that novice will do for you here. I heavily suggest replacing both of them with harvest golems. Harvest golems are very good at trading against low-cost, aggressive decks, and will help to sustain you into the late-game.
#2) Take out the Noble Sacrifices. Now, don't get me wrong, there's nothing bad about Noble Sacrifice at all, it's a pretty decent secret, but the problem is that it's the paladin's only decent secret. It's the only one that anybody ever runs in constructed, so when anybody sees you use a paly secret, they immediately know that it's Noble Sacrifice, and they play around it accordingly. I suggest replacing them with either Chillwind Yetis, or Dark Iron Dwarfs. Both are very solid 4-drops that should help clear out the opponent's early game. Yeti's 1 extra health is pretty useful sometimes, but so is D.I.D.'s 2 bonus attack on one of your early minions or Silverhand Recruit. If I were you, it's put in 1 of each for about 20 duels or so, and decide which one generally helps you better, and then to go with 2 of that one.
#3) Take out Lay on Hands. In a slower, more control oriented format, the heal and draw from L.O.H. can be kind of useful when you already have board control late in the game, but it's not going to help you much at all in the current meta-game. With the majority of the decks out there being low-mana-curve rushdown and warlock zoo, you're never going to have solid board control until very late game, and if you so survive to that late-game and secure board control, you've already won. Against all the agro out there now, lay on hands is just going to be a completely dead card, and the heal won't help you because you use your entire turn to do it, and they're just going to hit your face for far more than you healed for. Seeing how this deck doesn't really have a solid turn-2 drop, I'd replace it with bloodsail raider. It can be used on 2 for a 2/3, or later when you have a weapon out for more. It's a nice card both early, and mid-game, so I'd put it in.
Those are the suggestions that I have for your deck for the current meta-game. Hope that helps!
1
Okay, here's what I would say about your build.
#1: Wild Growth) Wild growth is a type of card that you either go all in on, or none in. Half measures don't work very well with it. If you can get it off turn 2 or 3 for that 1 mana accel, it's kind of nice, but it generally isn't as good as a 2-mana minion could have been there, not to mention that if you draw it around turns 6-8, it's practically dead in your hand until turn 10. If you want to stay away from wild growth, I would definitely replace it with 2 Innervates. While wild growth tends to really slow down your early game (if you draw it) in return for dropping later minions 1 turn earlier, Innervate really speeds up your early game letting you get huge guys out on the turn that you play it. Then, there's the full-measure. If you want to go all in on wild growth, I'd add in two Gagetsan Auctioneers for that crazy turn 10, 2 mana 3 draw. (If you don't understand, Wild Growth is a spell itself, +1, that gives you a 0-mana spell, +1, that draws a card, +1)
#1.5: Nourish) I assume that you're using Nourish for the card draw, correct? Pretty much the only time I'd use it for the mana would be if I could Innervate into it. If you are just using it as a 5-mana, draw 3, (which you should) then 1 is a good number to run.
#2: (lack of) Harvest Golem) This deck looks to be very fragile in the early game. If your opponent has a strong early curve, and you don't open up with wrath or swipe, it looks like it could take a dangerously long time for your keeper and druid of the claw to staunch the bleeding and stabilize the board. I personally would take out a doomsayer and a healing touch for 2 Harvest Golems. I'd say that Doomsayer rarely ever gets good value, and if you can drop a Golem early on to trade, it could end up preventing more damage in the long run than Healing Touch would have healed later on.
#3: Azure Drake) Azure Drake is a wonderful card in this deck. With 2 wraths, 2 swipes, and a starfall, its spell damage can really put in some work, and its draw power is a very nice addition. I would advise you to remove your naturalize to put in a second drake. With a big game hunter, 2 keeper silences, and all your removal spells, I'd say that it would be incredibly rare to find a situation where removing any 1 card would be worth giving your opponent 2 more cards.
Those are the only things that really stick out to me, Verezia. Any other changes I would suggest would just be small things that would have to be tested extensively to see if they actually effect the deck much, such as swapping 1 war for a second lore, or the remaining healing touch for a chillwind yeti, or something like that. Just small things.
I hope something that you read here helps!
1
The reason that this happened is because all of their effects activate at the same time (at the end of your turn). The order in which the graphics are played is determined by when they were played, but they all initially activated while they were alive, so they will carry out their effects before they die.