Hearthpwn

Mind Vision,Thoughtsteal,Convert

Duplicate,Echo of Medivh,Rhonin

Gang Up,Trade Prince Gallywix

Lorewalker Cho,Chromaggus

Compare this card with Lava Shock.This card can deal 1 more damage.But if you play it when you have locked Mana Crystal in this turn,they will be destroyed.I think it makes this card balanced.

If C'Thun and Flesh Tentacle are on your battlefield,you can put your minions between them to feed C'Thun.

If Tentacle devours a 3/2 enemy minion,C'Thun will gain +3/-1.Your opponent can throw unhealthy minions into the stomach of C'Thun to kill it.

REMOVED

Class:Lord

Who is he:The "good" guy. Liu Bei is the founding ruler of the Kingdom of Shu Han  during the Three Kingdoms Era.

I want to explain clearly that the old formula just replace the unfairness caused by the different exposures between different pages with another kind of unfairness.

I calculated the average number of votes for each page of The winter unveiling-A card design competition[Submission Topic]

As you can see,the first few pages have very high average number of votes.And the last page receives more votes.But the average number of votes on middle pages are up and down around 5.It shows that the exposures of middle pages are similar.

But the relatively differences of the average number of upvotes between middle pages are great as is shown in the chart below:

score=The total number of up-votes that the submission received/The average number of up-votes on the same page as the submission.

If your card is submitted on the 15th page and your card has 8 votes,your score will be 2.But if your card is submitted on the 16th page,your score will only be 1.5.The exposures of the 15th page and the 16th page are not very different.It's unfair for the cards that are submitted on the pages whose average number of up-votes are relatively higher than their adjacent pages because the qualities of the cards submitted on this page are high.And it's especially unfair for the cards that has high number of votes.

So I want to make a new way to calculate the score.

Quote from nurgling13 >>

Quote from Slissthe >>

(ab) / (c) = x

Where,
a = The total number of submissions on the same page as the submission.
b = The total number of up-votes that the submission received.
c = The total number of up-votes on the same page as the submission.
x = The submission's final score.

2 well-designed cards are on the same page.Each of them gets 10 votes and other cards get 0 vote.The score is 20*10/20=10

On the next page,1 card whose quality is the same with the 2 well-designed cards gets 10 votes and other cards get 0 vote.The score is 20*10/10=20.

I think it's unfair.

My suggestion:

(ab) / (c) = x

Where,
a = The total number of submissions on the previous,same and next pages as the submission.
b = The total number of up-votes that the submission received.
c = The total number of up-votes on the previous,same and next pages as the submission.
x = The submission's final score.

 

 

 

For one thing, you are really going to need to provide more explanation about why you think the current system is unfair. Second, your solution would make things much less fair. The main reason for the way we do things now is that different pages have different exposures. With your rules, the second page has to compete with the first page, which would be incredibly unfair, because the first page gets so much more votes than any other page. Posting on the second page would basically be a death sentence for your submission. With your system, you could have something like this: 

1000 total votes on the front page (average 50 per submission is not that unreasonable). The top card has 100 votes. Second card has 80 and third has 60. 250 total votes each on the second and third pages. Top votes for second page is 45 votes. The first page only includes votes from the first and second page because there is no previous page (this is a major oversight for your proposal, you should have thought that through). The top three card on the first page have scores of X*(39)/1250 = 3.12, 2.496, 1.872. The top card on the second page has a score 45*59/1500=1.77 Nothing advances from the second page, even though the top card there had  18% of the votes on its page, compared to the ones on the front page which had 10%, 8%, and 6% of the votes on that page.

 

(ab) / (c) = x

Where,
a = The total number of submissions on the same page as the submission.
b = The total number of up-votes that the submission received.
c = The total number of up-votes on the same page as the submission.
x = The submission's final score.

2 well-designed cards are on the same page.Each of them gets 10 votes and other cards get 0 vote.The score is 20*10/20=10

On the next page,1 card whose quality is the same with the 2 well-designed cards gets 10 votes and other cards get 0 vote.The score is 20*10/10=20.

I think it's unfair.

My suggestion:

(ab) / (c) = x

Where,
a = The total number of submissions on the previous,same and next pages as the submission.
b = The total number of up-votes that the submission received.
c = The total number of up-votes on the previous,same and next pages as the submission.
x = The submission's final score.

Well designs.My favorite card is Prophet SKeram.How did you find those awesome artworks for your cards?I spent most of the time  finding an artwork that is suitable for my idea when I made a card.It's so tiring.