Hearthpwn

About paladin, if you are talking about pen flinger ; I hate that deck and almost concede immidiately. But i majority of my paladin matchups was against pure paladin where they didnt had any board clears to stop my big minions. And i was even able to have a decent early game board. With wandmakers and such. 
   About rogues, I matched with i believe 2 rogues in my entire diamond run. One was playing stealth rogue the other was playing secret rogue. Stealth rogue was an easy win with the board clears and removals / heals i had. But secret rogue was pretty much hard. I got lucky on that one. I Ghave to admit.
    Last of all mages. Mage matchups has nothing to with your deck nor his deck. They are playing cyclone deck. Which is literally straight ahead jesus take the wheel type of decks. Sometiems they will get purely board clears, and sometimes they will get shit. Sometimes they wont have a cyclone , sometimes they will have it. So i would say i had 50/50 on the mages. And i cannot suggest anything for cyclone mages since as i said, its straight ahead luck based matchup. 

Yesterday i did had a very unlucky 5 loses in a row too. I do agree that luck hits very deeply sometimes. And as i said in the strategy's you should always have soul shears, board clear cards in the early game. OR even the 2 mana demon. I was able to get a decent early game with those cards, but yeah. I can agree that sometiems i do be like that.

Hmm, i do wonder where did that hs replays come from. Im sorry but i made the deck, so of course i was able to play the way it meant to. I have been trying different versions of it for about a month by now. After playing a month i was able to go from diamond 5 to diamond 2 literally on stream with this deck. Im sorry that you werent able to get the fun and win rates i got, but that doesnt mean i am faking it. 

Its like saying how can someone have %65 win rate with pure paladin. Well, there was a moment i went 24-2 with pure paladin. But i am pretty sure on the sites pure paladin has a decent %50-60 win rate. Sometimes stuff goes your way sometimes it doesnt :)

So far every time i literally had fel summoner in my hand and got major stuff out of it. Nowadays silence is not existing and the only thing that actualy stops him from having his deathrattle trigger is basicly devolving missiles. Which then would a big downside for the mage since losing her only high removal would hit her hard. So as an 8-3 she either hits like a rock or spawns a very nice big demon for you. As for  Sightless Watcher i do agree it makes your synergy a little bit hard. But , this decks biggest demon summoner is fel summoner, not Pit Commander. Therefore unless its really sad an you topdecked sightless watcher, you wouldnt be really getting sightless watcher that much. But i do agree its a bad card so if you want to swap literally anything that allows you to play in early game and helps you have a little bit hand is good. Such as draws/early taunts/spells etc. 

As for a replacement for Ancient Void Hound ; its kinda hard to say. The deck really relies on this card. But i think still a imprisoned antaen can help you get the outcome. Or if you have soulogist malifica ( or whatever heck her name is ) also can help. If you have it you can also go for felosophy the card that duplicates demons in your hand. There is not a lot of big demons that go face so, if you dont have the cards i suggested even tho its a little bit shitty you can go for the soulshard lapidary i believe the name is. The card that gives you +5 attack for a soul fragment. I know its not even a synergy with the deck but if you take out ancient void hound you will lose a lot of damage in the deck. So you got a lot of damage to close.

I hope these suggestions helped you , hopefuly you will enjoy the deck :) . Good luck on the matches ! 

Quote from P4dge >>

Quote from M0res >>

Quote from DreamsDeferred >>

Quote from Benom2207 >>

Fun, different, deckbuilding skill oriented, and progressive at that.

Wears out real fast though due the difference in heroes, and more so in minion/spell treasures is too polarized, it's like BG one on one with Queen Togwaggle vs Jandice sometimes. If they get to balancing it as much as they do BGs, we should have a great long-term one. If they keep yogg'ing though, it ain't gonna live long. 

 Not skill oriented at all stfu

 Agreed! There’s nothing skill oriented in hearthstone. If you play black jack you learn from experience and you become better with time but luck ultimately defines if you win or lose.

Now add a sophisticated algorithm to that with regards to who you play against and there you have it

 "Nothing skill oriented" 

"You get better over time" 

Someone needs to learn words and what they mean. 

 Im sure i will be able to bend space and time to get better 3 options in time. Yep truly getting better.

Quote from Shipmen >>

Quote from BlueTwo >>

WAY more enjoyable than battlegrounds IMO. The limited pool kind of nudges new players out of highly competitive play I'd imagine, but overall the concept is great and I  think it'll be better moving forward. The lack of hero powers and treasures currently available definitely limit the potential. but it's only going to get better with the full release. 

 You can like or dislike battleground and it is fine. Especially now, battleground is quite unbalance due to elementals and many people can dislike it.

But battleground is a real new game mode. Battleground is a totally new game mode, it is not a dungeon run in pvp like Duels. Calling Duels a new game mode is an heavy word, it is a fake new game mode.

 This, This was the thing i was looking in the comments. Duel's is NOT a new game mode. Its just arena with a new dress. And thats the only reason why i am dissapointed with it

Clearly you didnt pass school. Or learned reading with a donkey. Pay attention next time to understand whats going on.

It does already? 

I always wanted stuff like this for hearthstone, have more control on your game and dont just auto concede once you see a counter to your deck. It also allows you to have more fun and interactive games since you can just do whatever you want with those 10 ( or whatever number we want to have ). Like if you have a combo deck that doesnt work against some aggro's you can just swap out a couple card to maybe have better survivabilty. 
   But as much as its a good idea, we gotta see the bad side effects to it aswell. It basicly narrows down the decks that can be made for an expansion. Because there is a lot of decks that couınters other decks and literally live of of that in the meta. Imagine a malygos druid seein hunter and just taking 4 insane heal/taunt/armor/board clear stuff from his 4 cards. A druid can do that and shut off any aggro. But hunter cant really do that since aggro cant just become control with 4 cards. I know the example aint that good, but just this can show how many unbalanced stuff will happen out of it. 
    If hearthstone can apply it, i will be more than happy. But until then we better of just stay away from it . Or maybe just bring a beta version of it or something to try it.