Hearthpwn

Quote from DoubleSummon >>

Better mention which ones are you playing, most people who complain about aggro never tell which deck they are playing..

 

Edit

That feel good factor when you impotentalise a Pirate Warrior with a deck that should never have won the match up...
https://hsreplay.net/replay/9VDXEkPn5TYrGgPf7uY3id

Good times! :-)

I doubt anyone here actually works at Blizzard and would be likely to answer this for you - and even if they did work there, they still wouldnt likely be allowed to offer time estimates on this sort of thing.

You could send a direct communique to Blizzard to ask - doubt they would tell you though. :-)

I think he means (probably) that the card count doesnt pick up golden versions of the card (when it comes to auto-dusting, etc).
Which is the way it is supposed to work, since most people wouldn't normally choose to dust the non-golden cards automatically. 

Better to just go through and do them manually - a ball ache, but the potential mis-dusts would be worse.

"I wuz legend before it wuz popular...!" :-D

Quote from JohnX1133 >>

The reason people hate playing against quest rogue is that it is a high roll deck and it is not interactive. If you hate losing to quest rogue, play aggro. 

I don't think it is overpowered. People are not used to a new deck archetype so quest rogue had inflated win rate in the first month of Un'goro. Once you get it, it's a straightforward game. I played freeze mage 50% of the time above rank 4 last month and I had a positive win rate against quest rogue. And we've seen taunt warrior beating quest rogue in tournaments although it is not favored. 

"Rogue".... my OCD won't allow me to continue reading any further without BSoD...

Quote from AndreiRO >>

Quote from scorpyon >>

Quote from AndreiRO >>

Quote from EthureaI >>

Quote from AndreiRO >>

Quote from EthureaI >>

*Pointless ego-stroking*

*Irritated Retort*

 *Unrepentant excusal verbosity*

 *Continued reprimand*

 I think the core issue here is more in the fact that (regardless of the inappropriate filibustering and nauseating self-congratulatory overgrandising) the fact remains that such a post is currently in the wrong thread. 
Posting how amazing you consider yourself to have been in a situation that caused you such positive feeling in a thread designed to encapsulate all that is harrowing and soul-destroying about the game for those miserable few who suffer these torments is a sure-fast way to reap disgusted rebuttal in the least, outright outrage in the otherwise.

You would do well to put the more enjoyable and pleasant experiences in the thread designed to that effect, rather than effectively coming across as an under-bridge-dwelling antagonist at best... 

I'm just Saiyan...

 Excuse me, did I say anything wrong to that guy that I need your passive "kindness" ("*irritated retort*")?

 

Quote from AndreiRO >>

Quote from EthureaI >>

Quote from AndreiRO >>

Quote from EthureaI >>

*Pointless ego-stroking*

*Irritated Retort*

 *Unrepentant excusal verbosity*

 *Continued reprimand*

Quote from MvonTzeskagrad >>

So, you are playing Jade druid pretending that you deserve the oxygen you breathe jsut because you added Earthen Scales to replace Living Roots?

You are disgusting. And the fact you had a perfect turn, got into turn 10 by turn 6 and had 5/5 golems the turn right after that only makes you worse.

It's somewhat irritating when yuo're playing a deck idea that you came up with, you win loads with it, then suddenly you start seeing other start copying it almost card for card (and losing, because they obviously dont know how to play it in the first place).

And then all of a sudden, it becomes THE new net deck. It's so frustrating, because it's like some of the freshness and originality that you put into it has been stripped away and stolen.

Sure it happens a lot, but it's always that little bit grating. I don't like chucking the deck away, though. Instead I see if I can modify it somehow to move it away from the more mainstream version while still being viable and winnable.

Quote from Grimlock01 >>

I LIKED SHAMAN BEFORE IT WAS CANCER

Well it's not cancer anymore, so now it's cool to like again!

Quote from DoubleSummon >>

Quote from Infirc >>

Quote from DoubleSummon >>

Quote from scorpyon >>

Quote from DoubleSummon >>

Which deck do you play? If you see so many of the same deck why not change to a counter?

 

Amazing deck idea.. 

 Because then you are accepting a limitation that you can only ever play aggro or counter-aggro.
This in turn is then accepting that there are only 2 decks worth playing. So we get to the outcome that if this is the case, then the first deck is obviously too strong, since you have to eaither play it or tech against it. 

A good comparison to consider is what other decks (if any) you are being forced to counter against. If there are no more than one or two, then it is evidence that there is a problem there.

 There are pleny of decks that are viable and can fight against aggro, you are avoiding the question though, which total greed deck are you playing? Ramp druid? Control priest? Control warrior?

Quest deck?

 all those decks you mentioned SHOULD be viable ant not instantly die against aggro, and they would be if blizzard just nerfed the charge mechanic.

 So? What is op complaining about?

Quote from Zence >>

Blizz always introduces a new mechanic with each expansion. The ones that stick are the ones that you can make a ton of stuff out of without limiting design space (Inspire)

But we haven't seen any 50% chance to... from GVG

Joust from TGT

Tri Class cards from MSG

While I wish some things were reconsidered this is perfectly normal. Prepare to lose Adapt next expansion as it is most likely an Un'Goro exclusive.