• 5

    posted a message on Is Hearthstone Streaming Viewership Decreasing? Why?

     

    Well, I don't watch tournaments anymore... HS has never been a big staple of competitive gaming, but recent design developments have made tournaments plain silly and completely pointless. They could just flip the first 6 cards and decide who wins based on that in 95% of the matches (this trend is worse in tourneys than ladder, so not taking shots at ladder with this).

    Arena has become very boring to watch due to the limited cardpool and slanted card selection towards Un'goro, but Amaz at least can liven it up (I know he grates on many people, but I find him enjoyable in small doses). 

    And too many upcoming streamers just try go for silly meme-stuff,  engage in drama or are just plain rude. I'll just stick to ThijsNL and Savjz.

    But yeah in general, watching HS streams have become less interesting.

     

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on The Black Knight

     

    Black knight is more for mid-range / tempo decks which benefit from a nice swig in the midgame (I'm not saying it is currently good at that, but that is what it does best).

    It has no use in aggro decks, you don't need the swing... you just want to push past that taunt. An owl or spellbreaker will do just as well, but even those should largely be unnecessary... pw has plenty of dmg and is good all-round, teching just weakens it vs the field most of the time.

     

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 6

    posted a message on Buff Meteor - it does not deal enough damage!

     

    Life.... life finds a way.

    Posted in: General Chat
  • 2

    posted a message on New player - The grind is hard even if you play well

     

    I recently returned to HS after a hiatus and played down from 25, and I faced quite a few "fresh" players (or at least players with fresh collections).

    The difference in power was enormous. Obviously the difference has always been big (like in most games of this type), but even against players with a relatively reasonable deck construction and who didn't make any glaring mistakes it felt like it was almost impossible to lose.

    I don't think I have seen the difference this big before.

     

    Posted in: Players and Teams Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on bizzard please do something to nerf quest rouge

     

    It ain't a very good deck, but it's not a healthy one. I like to compare it to freeze mage, which is a deck I enjoy both playing and playing against... like freeze mage it's alot about your own gameplan, but unlike freeze mage it is almost impossible to tech against (like versus freeze a zoo deck could go anti-secret or a control deck could include rag or whatnot). You're either playing the type of deck it crushes or the type of deck it gets demolished by.

    That is a tell-tale sign the deck doesn't fit the game design. One or two polarized matchups wouldn't be that bad (it could just be due to stats not lining up), but only polarized matchups means something is off.

     

     

     

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on Good Job Blizzard

     

    The meta is decent but too strictly defined. You have very defined powerhouse cards and a very low overall card count in standard, and add to that that the matchups are too polarized - too many 70/30s and too few 60/40s. Basically it adds up to "buy yourself this, and then we'll let you win". It's a very prevalent trend and it is largely class-based, probably to induce more buys.

    (And no, that is not a whine because I don't have the cards, my collection is completely fine)

    But I'm glad the meta is a bit slower and requires more thinking. It is definitely better now than it was before Un'Goro.

     

     

     

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Hogger

     

    Golden cards are always safe to DE, since you get a substitute legendary anyway.

    If you are collection golden cards, obviously keep... but that will require a lot of money to keep up.

     

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Contemplating a Pre-Order for Un'Goro

     

    2-3 legendaries on average, 2k dust or so and perhaps half the epics in singles. I'd say that is my pre-order experience.

    But given that adventures are now out, I'm personally not buying any more HS stuff. I felt like a pack pre-order was fine given that it was surrounded by adventures where you got all cards,  giving you a solid window to collect the collectible expansions.

    But now I see that keeping reasonably up to date with collecting will require a lot more purchases or an insane increase amount in time spent. I don't have the investment in the game to do that. I'm also not seeing any indication in the new expansion that HS is going away from its design creed (over the last 3 expansions) of favoring simplicity over complexity (I'm not saying it should be worse, but about equally good is not to much to ask?). Team 5 at this point feels like an RPG-storyteller that punishes every other tactic than doing your most basic attack.

     

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 3

    posted a message on New Paladin Legendary - Sunkeeper Tarim

     

    Yay, another slow, situational and understatted paladin monster.

     

     

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on New Shaman Legendary - Kalimos, Primal Lord

     

    What the hell, it isn't overstatted.

    I expected more, Blizzard.

     

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.