• 1

    posted a message on If you could have any Non-Collectible card made Collectible which one would you choose?

    Dorothee actually sounds like a really interesting card to me, I'd like to see how people could design a deck around her, her loss of tempo to play and cost wouldn't work in aggro to take advantage of the charge, so she could have a nice spot in some weird combo deck or control.

    Boneraptorsounds like it would amazing against Shaman/Warrior.

    Fallout Slime is a really OP card, but could really help for board control.

     

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 3

    posted a message on Group therapy! Need to blow off steam? Mega salty? Here is the place!

    I don't even have an issue with Flamewreathed Faceless that much, can we instead just remove Thing from Below?

    Extremely tilting for a Shaman to play 0 mana 5/5 taunt when he has already been up on tempo on the whole game.

    It's very common for a Shaman to go from no board to tunnel trogg, wolves, flame tongue, 2 Thing from Below, all in one turn.

    After that he plays the retardhammer and you're dead.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on [POLL] Do you think Wild Pyromancer/ Commanding shout combo should be NERFED ?
    Quote from robert_fanr >>

    Ok I get it !

    Every player in this community loves playing control/combo decks and the general consent is that if someone is playing Aggro/Tempo/Mid-Range they have no skill .

    I reached legend so I do know how to play .

    I guess I just have a different view of what fun means in this game . I for example do not consider fun to keep ruining what your opponent is trying to do until he concedes or you finally get your win condition . I consider fun being proactive and trying to win the game by your moves rather than just denying whatever the opponent is doing until he has nothing left .

    The issue is you're asking for nerfs to deck archetypes that are already far weaker than Aggro/Tempo/Aggro Midrange.
    When those said archetypes are already the top of the meta, why are you asking to weaken combo/control?
    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 4

    posted a message on Why is Blizzard designing this kind of meta?
    Quote from MolochZ >>

    It's because aggro is cheap and simply to play. HS is a game for complete noobs who couldn't pilot a control deck even if they wanted to.

    All Blizzard games are the same, they are balanced around the lowest common denominator. Just look at WoW and D3.

     RIP old Blizzard, Starcraft 1 and Warcraft 3 were amazing competitive games, and Diablo 2 was the best.
    Sadly ladder will be full of mindless aggro until maybe the next expansion does something, which I seriously doubt, and it's only going to become more aggressive from here.
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 6

    posted a message on This is why Competitive Hearthstone is a Joke

    Most pro players seem to dislike Yogg as well, I wouldn't be surprised to see it tournament banned before it rotates out.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 6

    posted a message on New keyword idea: piercing

    I think we need a new keyword that can fight against aggro, heaven knows they have enough tools already.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 6

    posted a message on Group therapy! Need to blow off steam? Mega salty? Here is the place!
    Quote from Le_Purple_Turtle >>

    Just played a Rogue. I myself am playing an aggro shaman. I get her down to 7 health. Reno Jackson. Fine, I guess. I have a Doomhammer equipped, as well as a Rockbiter weapon. I can do ten damage instantly, plus numerous other spells (Lava Burst, Lightening Bolt). I think I'm gonna be fine. She then plays a youthful brewmaster, returning Reno to her hand. I proceed to get her down to one health and...she Renos once again. Fuck my life. 

     Sounds like sweet justice to me. (obvious bias)
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on What's your favorite archetype?

    You guys are a cool bunch, the majority voting control.

    It's a shame Blizzard hates thoughtful games of Hearthstone.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on Group therapy! Need to blow off steam? Mega salty? Here is the place!
    Quote from WhatAChamp >>

    Why even invent casual if people are only going to play aggro shaman and aggro warrior? If you're really that bad at this game that you need to run tier 1 decks in casual to get a win then go play against AI and leave casual for those of us who like to dick around with random decks.

    EDIT: Asshole aggro shaman had the nerve to call me a noob after he beat me when I was playing Blood of the Ancient One priest. No shit you beat me you lowlife.

     I feel you, a Face Hunter with Legend cardback wanted to add me after I beat him, I just kept denying his friend request.
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Elder Scrolls Legends - Now in Open Beta!
    Quote from AbusingKel >>

    I installed yesterday and pushed through 8-10 battles. The mechanics in place to provide a comeback chance are smart design. The lanes, card draw from runes, and prophecy cards make stabilization & comebacks far more likely when compared to the steamroll effect that is generally the case in HS. There was enough there for me to pursue it. I'll load it on my laptop and give it a go this weekend. 

     Yeah I really enjoy the Rune/Prophecy system, something that actually discourages going full SMOrc decks.
    Posted in: Other Games
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.