I just logged in to say that this deck is great. Fun and reliable!
Good job!
I'm just thinking about using Elysiana for long games, but I couldn't find a spot for her yet. Maybe I'll try to remove one Bad Luck Albatross (not right now, because I'm in a win streak :) ).
Hunter is just a waste of time to play against cause u know ur going to lose by turn 5 people complaining bout ganklord rogue as stong deck to is laughable.
"Losing by turn 5" is the opposite of "wasting time". :)
I challenge you guys to write down how many games you play that were decided by RNG (as in cards "generated by...").
Yeah... that's RNGstone right now.
I' m no saying top decks, because top decks are something intrinsic to any card game. But the RNG factor in HS is too much... It is almost like to play head and tails...
I'm playing much less Hearthstone these days, but always keep checking Hearthpwn almost daily, because there is always great content here.
Just to illustrate how much I like and am used to this site: I started playing MTGA a few months ago and I'm still looking for a great source of news and decks, because all of those that I find "are not like Hearthpwn...".
I plan just to play standard and don't have much time to grind neither want to spend money on the game... so, I dusted all my legendaries and epics... I really don't regret it. I can play almost all good decks on standard right now and have enough dust to craft some interesting legendaries in the upcoming expansion. And I will dust all my legendaries and epics from sets that are rotating out.
But, of course, if you think you could be interested in Wild anytime, don't do that.
A ham fisted solution to a problem that doesn't exist. Just a stupid idea with no reliable method for implementation.
I would say there is a totally realiable method for implementation. Blizz is already saying we are getting a new way to autocomplete decks, based on the % of winning (therefore usage) of cards, so, yes, they can say which cards (or combination of cards) is the current meta.
I agree with the author of this thread. This could be a interesting mode to play.
2
I just logged in to say that this deck is great. Fun and reliable!
Good job!
I'm just thinking about using Elysiana for long games, but I couldn't find a spot for her yet. Maybe I'll try to remove one Bad Luck Albatross (not right now, because I'm in a win streak :) ).
0
"Losing by turn 5" is the opposite of "wasting time". :)
2
Mine is Android and it is crashing too...
2
No bug here... Automatically winning with Zephyr as expected.
3
Easy legend! (For your opponents, at least... :P)
1
Well played!
0
Nice! :)
1
I challenge you guys to write down how many games you play that were decided by RNG (as in cards "generated by...").
Yeah... that's RNGstone right now.
I' m no saying top decks, because top decks are something intrinsic to any card game. But the RNG factor in HS is too much... It is almost like to play head and tails...
2
Oh, boy...
I'm playing much less Hearthstone these days, but always keep checking Hearthpwn almost daily, because there is always great content here.
Just to illustrate how much I like and am used to this site: I started playing MTGA a few months ago and I'm still looking for a great source of news and decks, because all of those that I find "are not like Hearthpwn...".
Thank you all! Best wishes to you!
4
Token druid is pretty insane right now. Just saying...
1
I plan just to play standard and don't have much time to grind neither want to spend money on the game... so, I dusted all my legendaries and epics... I really don't regret it. I can play almost all good decks on standard right now and have enough dust to craft some interesting legendaries in the upcoming expansion. And I will dust all my legendaries and epics from sets that are rotating out.
But, of course, if you think you could be interested in Wild anytime, don't do that.
0
I would say there is a totally realiable method for implementation. Blizz is already saying we are getting a new way to autocomplete decks, based on the % of winning (therefore usage) of cards, so, yes, they can say which cards (or combination of cards) is the current meta.
I agree with the author of this thread. This could be a interesting mode to play.
0
Nice! Well played!
0
Upgrade the hero power but changes its cost to 3.
1
Genn is not a serious problem. And, for Baku, a good nerf would be improve the hero power but increase its cost to 3.