Kangor deck is a meme. Why nerf a non-meta defining card? Paladin has no removal tools vs hard agro. Warlock on the other hand has both removal and can pump out huge minions from 4-5 mana that keep auto resummoning giant after giant after giant.. To me warlock and DK look like first candidates to be nerfed
Hi man. Burn decks are faster than yours, so you have to win by lucky early evolves and pressure. But I wouldnt recommend crafting it if you are short on dust. Flurgl is core, unfortunately, as it openes for crazy turns vs aggro.
Thanks man! Glad you liked it. I think its really fun too. I actually replaced 1 naga with Rotgill and its really good, but Naga is good too. Its just I had Rotgill and wanted to use new card
Yes, got my fast legend with a my variant of DR rogue. And also rogue crushes Blood and unholy DK, so the new fresh class is not worth playing. I cant imagine blizzard is happy about it.
The nerf makes hunter deck totally unplayable. Killing your opponent by turn 7 before and turn 9-10 now is too huge of a difference. Denatrius change is bad only for all other classes but druid. Druid doesnt care, he plays it with brann anyway
Same. I have 2300h in BG's. Have probably 7,5k in HS since release. Have wife, kid, good Job, plenty of time doing other hobbies. The key here is playing while working, walking, eating, shitting or watching TV. This game is perfectly suited for that
No word about fixing Vanndar / Drektar abilities to no longer keep their stats on magnitized mechs. Just played a game and they no longer may get abused with mechs to get perma-stats. Which puts Vanndar / Drektar right back to dumpster. R.I.P
I understand your point and see the value of faceless outside the combo. On the other hand, with arcanist you get more space in your deck to run control options like Neptulon or Lokholar that help you "get there". I don't agree on inconsistency in matchup of arcanist version. Guess its the matter of taste.
Sorry, there is a better 5 card combo that deals more dmg: brann - arcanist - zola (on arcanist) - arcanist - arcanist - arcanist - moonbeam = 34Dmg, only 5 card slots taken
Also, control warrior is HIGHLY favorable in this matchup due to fact they run Mutanus (or brann-mutanus) and have way above 34 HP in general. But never the less, absolutely winnable. Love this archetype, have been playing it with arcanist combo with fair amount of success.
This deck needs to be nerfed to oblivion, not buffed! It is completely uninteractive, the damage you get is almost infinite and unavoidable. That is really bad deck design. The only good thing against it is hyper agro. Control needs to sit with the full hand and burn their cards. Terrible game experience. Horrible design!
Thx for your feedback. I am playing throug it very slowly. I am ok to pay a few bucks for a game , but I hate games that constantly require investments to progress or compete. Shame this is one of those
4
Kangor deck is a meme. Why nerf a non-meta defining card? Paladin has no removal tools vs hard agro. Warlock on the other hand has both removal and can pump out huge minions from 4-5 mana that keep auto resummoning giant after giant after giant.. To me warlock and DK look like first candidates to be nerfed
0
Hi man. Burn decks are faster than yours, so you have to win by lucky early evolves and pressure. But I wouldnt recommend crafting it if you are short on dust. Flurgl is core, unfortunately, as it openes for crazy turns vs aggro.
0
Thanks man! Glad you liked it. I think its really fun too. I actually replaced 1 naga with Rotgill and its really good, but Naga is good too. Its just I had Rotgill and wanted to use new card
0
Yes, got my fast legend with a my variant of DR rogue. And also rogue crushes Blood and unholy DK, so the new fresh class is not worth playing. I cant imagine blizzard is happy about it.
3
The nerf makes hunter deck totally unplayable. Killing your opponent by turn 7 before and turn 9-10 now is too huge of a difference. Denatrius change is bad only for all other classes but druid. Druid doesnt care, he plays it with brann anyway
1
Same. I have 2300h in BG's. Have probably 7,5k in HS since release. Have wife, kid, good Job, plenty of time doing other hobbies. The key here is playing while working, walking, eating, shitting or watching TV. This game is perfectly suited for that
5
If it is neutral card, its obvious sir D that is getting nerfed. He will probably lose his basic "deal 5".
0
No word about fixing Vanndar / Drektar abilities to no longer keep their stats on magnitized mechs. Just played a game and they no longer may get abused with mechs to get perma-stats. Which puts Vanndar / Drektar right back to dumpster. R.I.P
0
I feel sick already
0
I understand your point and see the value of faceless outside the combo. On the other hand, with arcanist you get more space in your deck to run control options like Neptulon or Lokholar that help you "get there". I don't agree on inconsistency in matchup of arcanist version. Guess its the matter of taste.
0
So you run only 1 moonbeam. Arcanist work on both "shots" from the moonbeam
0
Sorry, there is a better 5 card combo that deals more dmg: brann - arcanist - zola (on arcanist) - arcanist - arcanist - arcanist - moonbeam = 34Dmg, only 5 card slots taken
Also, control warrior is HIGHLY favorable in this matchup due to fact they run Mutanus (or brann-mutanus) and have way above 34 HP in general. But never the less, absolutely winnable. Love this archetype, have been playing it with arcanist combo with fair amount of success.
6
This deck needs to be nerfed to oblivion, not buffed! It is completely uninteractive, the damage you get is almost infinite and unavoidable. That is really bad deck design. The only good thing against it is hyper agro. Control needs to sit with the full hand and burn their cards. Terrible game experience. Horrible design!
0
143 , no battle pass. I was making legend in standard both months , then playing BG's
0
Thx for your feedback. I am playing throug it very slowly. I am ok to pay a few bucks for a game , but I hate games that constantly require investments to progress or compete. Shame this is one of those