Hearthpwn

Quote from Kissmealloveragain >>

Treespeaker

 This card can be a permanent Bloodlust for Druid attached to a 4/4 body. That's scary.

Só, basically what you're asking is people from the marketing department (corporate assholes, IMO), to intervene (even more) in the design and technical team work.

That line of thinking is the cause of things like Diablo Immortal to exist.

The art is the opposite of Scorce.

Quote from Morkimus >>

Well, to answer OP: I am sort of hyped about the expansion.

It kinda saddens me that the first thing people now say when seeing a card is "Odd/Even Class can now play this!!!" It's just sad when the community is already barricading half of their own collections for the sake of forced netdecking introduced in a previous expansion.

"Odd Warrior cannot run this.", "Odd Paladin doesn't need healing or immunity.", "I can sense this being used in Odd Rogue.", "Might see some play in Even Shaman in Wild." Oh wow, nice of you to already cut down half of the incoming cards before they come out. Back in the day, they were filler if they were bad. Now they are just filler if their cost is not the mainstream class cost! What a time to be alive.

Genn and Baku have pretty much neutered the Loa playstyle before they even came out, just because most of their spirits do not share a cost with them.

Still, I am hyped for those 15% of people who might not be so eager to leash their own deckbuilding by the balls and who may actually do something new during the first week. As for the rest, well, if I see Baku or Genn in the first few days I'll give them the instant-concede (it's probably the win they are after anyway).

 You're blaming the players for a [wrong] decision the game designers made. The odd and even mechanic is plaing stupid in my opinion and the even or odd debacle will ever be a thing.

Quote from iFaisal11 >>

Quote from k10shirole >>

2 warrior weapons in same expansion... 

 the 3rd one tmrw i think 

 It looks more like the Shaman hero style tho.

Reno Paladin in Wild will be a thing, maybe?

I really think the Molten Giant interaction will work as everybody is saying, but on the other hand, based solely on the wording, it shouldn't work, because High Priest Thekal doesn't "deal" damage, it converts damage into armour, so your hero doesn't "take" damage.

I'm 37 and sometimes I feel like a creep in a playground when I see younger gamers.

Glad to see so many others like me here.

Looks like OP must struggle with premature ejaculation.

Quote from Bee >>

I think I've saved enough

 When did you start all this saving? Old God's? Or do you only buy packs with money?

Quote from DSchu102285 >>

Quote from clawz161 >>

"ItS NoT EvEn A TiEr OnE DeCk"

Do you think bomb warrior would be where it is is literally everyone wasn't playing it like they are? Hell no. Decks have higher win rates the more games they're played more often than not, more games come from more players. If as many people were playing is as bomb warrior the stats would be more skewed

HS Replay has the Murloc Shaman at 53.38% WR, Bomb Warrior is at 53.45% WR, and there are 8 others decks that are performing with a variance of  .5%-1% WR that are all within the range of 54.72% to 52.17%.

 Good bot

"ItS NoT EvEn A TiEr OnE DeCk"

Do you think bomb warrior would be where it is is literally everyone wasn't playing it like they are? Hell no. Decks have higher win rates the more games they're played more often than not, more games come from more players. If as many people were playing is as bomb warrior the stats would be more skewed

Quote from Jonesy978 >>

I miss this card so much. It might just hold Rogues back a little. Instead we get that god damn 4 mana weapon and 2 free Dread Corsairs every time.

and 4 mana 4/3 get a spell and deal 4 damage for 0. rogue is fun to play against...

I miss this card so much. It might just hold Rogues back a little. Instead we get that god damn 4 mana weapon and 2 free Dread Corsairs every time.

So much value, so much worse than starving buzzard. Just ridiculous. 

Combo'd with the Echo loc / Scargill / Both (bear in mind it can generate copies of itself..), this is disproportionately powerful. If it was nerfed the damage to murloc shaman would be huge. 

If you can't answer it, you lose

man, do I ever wish that Golakka Crawler was in standard to help handle pirate rogue, which are currently taking over Ranks 5-1 from what I see. It would make them easier to deal with if you aren’t playing warrior.

I feel like to have a good shot at legend you need to play either control warrior or join the rogues.

Does anyone else miss that little guy??

Joining the band wagon here.

Seeing allot of these Nerf Dr.Boom threads and thinking they're probably kidding. I mean why nerf a card that needs you to reach turn 7 and have the card in hand to play when we have tier 1 token druid beating us consistantly before turn 7.

edit: I will admit the hero power is strong, but need to have priorities in what to nerf first.

Overwhelmingly type 1 bandwagon comments here.

Blizzard makes it happen so it must be good. lets reason towards it.

Trademark of uncritical attitude. If Blizzard says the Earth is flat, that must be right then.

Wouldn't the fanboy come up with reaons to defend such a position. 

You people..

Quote from iWatchUSleep >>

Funniest thing is that the most consistent counter to token druid doesn't run a single board clear.

Oh well, see you in a few days when you've found a new scapegoat to blame your lack of intelligence on, OP.

 Why resort to personal insults?  Such immature behavior.

I ve been playing a lot against token druid (and also playing it myself) and for me, the problem is Soul of the Forest. It makes wide boards immune to AOE (except 2 specific cards) and that make control decks ( the usual counter to aggro ) unable to counter that deck. The counter is zoo which is agro too because can make favorable trades and control the board and that does not feel right.

And stop comparing it with bomb warrior. Bomb warrior never was a powerhouse. It is not even the best warrior deck.