Hearthpwn

Quote from PetiteMouche >>

Quote from Reviewer >>

I enjoy anomalies. If you don't like the one you get, just concede and start a new game. Pro tip: nobody cares about your rating.

Nobody cares what you enjoy this isn't a thread about your feelings. I don't think the op cares that you believe that nobody cares. It's his rating and if he alone cares about it, that's enough.

That's shit design if you must concede to enjoy the game and that's shit community if you support it.

Also, good decision op. Your life should improve significantly now that hearthstone is removed from it. For starters you won't have to interact with the top 5 worst community of all times.

 This is a thread about BG Anomalies. Just because OP doesn't like them doesn't mean all the posts should be anomaly bashing. Also, notice the irony of spending time writing to someone that nobody cares about an opinion. Having to concede isn't great design, no, but I very rarely do, if I get two heroes completely incompatible with the anomaly. I'd say almost all anomalies are pretty good at keeping the game fresh.

I enjoy anomalies. If you don't like the one you get, just concede and start a new game. Pro tip: nobody cares about your rating.

How else are you planning to stop people abusing a broken interaction? Shaming them on the internet doesn't work, you know...

Dude, are you okay? Huge difference between 6 mana auctioneer and 8 mana auctioneer. A lot of games are already decided by turn 7. You cannot spend turn 8 drawing cards.

The format is alright but it's C'Thun/Jade fest. It gets old quickly and a 8 mana C'Thun is a bit much. The eyestalk has never been a problem for me, it's quite slow to make an impact.

Well, you can have all those full sets for free if you no-life  the game, but not if you play for 30 minutes per day. Having a life doesn't mean you are doing something wrong, quite the opposite. And I personally think that 100 dollars per expansion is ridiculously expensive, even if it gives you the full set.

Throwing accusations without proof makes people never take you seriously

Duels was an awesome concept initially. Perfect blend of constructed and dungeon run. Sadly there are 2 problems: they didn't update as much as they promised. We still have the original heroes from scholomance academy. And then we have some power crept new ones. There has never been any interesting ruleset or a smaller pool of available sets. And no care for balance. But I get them, they are a business, not a game development studio. A mode like duels is too expensive to maintain, so it's easier to sweep it under a rug and forget about it.

By instinct I would say Armor Vendor is more immediate and can help contest early boards. Priest needs to survive firat and foremost. 1 mana decent body and heal 4 is pretty premium. Priest players have a tendency to get greedy. I understand playing control mirrors is boring, but pick your battles. If you survive aggro till turn 7-8, you probably won.

Some bots are Blizzard bots to give every human player a better winrate. The non blizzard bots probably get banned

Can you remove world record from your title now that people showed proof of it having happened lots of times already?

Before i removed the mage titan from the deck i managed to do 20 after surviving two turns. Somehow he didn't have removal

Designing a 6 mana Malygos with spelldamage 5-8 goes against their design philosophy, it's almost shocking and shows their recent loss of direction.

Been having a blast as freeze mage so far. Very nistalgic deck to play. With the nerf of alibi, we might see more freeze cards, like blizzard.

Of all the bugs they need to know about, this is not it!