• 2

    posted a message on New Warlock Legendary - Lord Godfrey

     

    Quote from DarkJak >>

    Hellfire is garbage. Twisting Nether only got good when aggro fizzled out.

     
     Sorry to say but hellfire is better vs aggro and TN is better vs control/midrange :) i dont know which aggro deck can make 4+ hp minions on turn 3 or 4 :) he will have like 4-5 low hp minion easily deleted with hellfire.
    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Don't craft it, it's too weak in wild!

     

    Quote from agon_EU >>

    Everyone that thinks that Ragnaros is weak should delete their Hearthstone account ASAP. 

     
     This!!!! Same thing for Reno :) in control meta reno is best card ever...even vs agro meta... At lest i warlock.
    Posted in: Wild Format
  • 2

    posted a message on Why are we regressing?

    Lord godfrey say hi to rebuke :)

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on New Warlock Legendary - Lord Godfrey

    Ok both of warlock legedlndary cards will be golden in my collection! They fit in my golden renolock :) 

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on Why Rebuke is exactly what we need.

    New warlock legendary say hi to rebuke hahahhahah 

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on New Shaman Hero Card - Hagatha The Witch

     

    Quote from M_Ronin >>

     

    Quote from Rapidosamurai >>

     

     
     Warlock DK is the best and you cant compare this hero and warlocks DK xd it cost 10 mana and you can play DK and you have only hope that you wont die haha only 10 mana DK deserve to be the strongest one.. Compare it with anduin and i think its better then him :) you have passive spell filler for your hand and you can destroy all enemy minions if you have your own, and as shaman im 100% sure you will have at least 3+ minons on your side of board :) and with new echo mechanic you have insane value of passive hero power. This is very good card just hope it wont be a shamanstone once again xD
     I compare them, because in the late game you will have to race mages, warlocks in a value race and if it's not enough you will not win the race. So what do you think if this is better than summoning a 3-6 lifesteal elemental almost every turn?
     
     
     Mybe it is i dont know for sure but as shaman you have spell generator but as mage minion generator xd in my opinion this hero is better then mage one but still we need to see 111 more cards from new set :)
    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on New Shaman Hero Card - Hagatha The Witch

     

    Quote from Pedrolo >>

    HAHAHAHAHAHA.

    Blizzard hyped you with MEHgatha the reveal day and we got this terrible disgusting pile of shit. OMG LOL. This is so funny.

    Im soooo glad I havent preordered! I feel sorry for the ones who have thrown their money to the trash!

     
     You are so dumb...who the fck would preorder just because of one card...dude you have some serious problem...
    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on New Warlock Legendary - Glinda Crowskin

     

    Quote from Pedrolo >>

    This card reads: make your oponent spend a removal. This is as good as counterspell, no one serious will get value out of it, just burn an oponent resource.

     
     I see standard player :)
    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on New Shaman Hero Card - Hagatha The Witch

     

    Quote from M_Ronin >>

    In terms of power level, its obviously worse than Guldan DK. But is it better than Jaina DK?

     
     Warlock DK is the best and you cant compare this hero and warlocks DK xd it cost 10 mana and you can play DK and you have only hope that you wont die haha only 10 mana DK deserve to be the strongest one.. Compare it with anduin and i think its better then him :) you have passive spell filler for your hand and you can destroy all enemy minions if you have your own, and as shaman im 100% sure you will have at least 3+ minons on your side of board :) and with new echo mechanic you have insane value of passive hero power. This is very good card just hope it wont be a shamanstone once again xD
    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Glinda Crowskin a bit too strong in wild?

     

    Quote from Salohcin >>

    Or glinda + Naga + 1 free giant = a full board for 3 cards and 10 mana. Probably too unreliatable and late in the game.

    Glinda + molten at less than 11 health left probably won't see play either except maybe a reno deck just because too many wild decks have 10+ damage reach. i.e the reason Jarraxus is no longer played.

    I could be completely wrong though.

     
     Believe me jarraxus would see play if there is no DK xd
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Glinda Crowskin a bit too strong in wild?

     

    Quote from RavenSunHP >>

    Glinda + molten is a Controlock combo.

    It takes more conditions (less health, more mana) but way less cards (just 2, against 3+), making way for more tools than Nagalock can have in their hand and decks.

     
     THIS!! i think noone understand this sadly...this card just doesn't fit in giantlock....
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on New Warlock Legendary - Glinda Crowskin

    To all those guys who are talking "oh my god gianlock will be even more insane". JUST NO!!! Who the fck would run this card if you have naga? Ofc you need to summon naga then few giants and IF naga survive next turn you can play this with other giants but did you relize that for this combo you will spend 5 or 6+cards in two turns...this card is more for handlock or renolock which is better for molten giants and you need just 2 cards for full board or 3 cards for full board and 20-30 hp. So if you dont need so many combo pieces but just 2 cards then you have more space for spells etc.. This is just an other board filler and also in renolock type deck you could combo this card with so many more otions that you have in deck..in giantlock, only 1 combo that is viable...even zoolock is better with this card then giantlock... Guys please, turn on your brain a little bit (no offense).

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Glinda Crowskin a bit too strong in wild?

    You guys say naga is better...dude you can fill board with 2 cards glinda and 1 molten giant...naga? You will probably drop almost every giant from your hand and when they clear the board what you got?? So yes i dont think you will run glinda in giantlock xd it is better in controllock or renolock or even handlock with 1 molten and still you have emparor so if you manage to lower the cost of glinda and reno you have full board and 30hp :)

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Free Class Legendary. A Lose/Lose Situation?

     

    Quote from Ch4ce >>

     

    Quote from Rapidosamurai >>

    I agree with OP. Why? Here is my reason: first of all i play only warlock (wild) and have full golden warlock decks..i cant say its lose/lose its free 400 dust but gosh i would be happier with 1600 dust, not random legy, if i get warlock legy i will diss him and craft golden one (if he is good) so i dont care what legy i will get.... But with 1600 dust i could craft 1 golden epic or 2 golden rares or 4 golden commons xD i craft every card that can be used in renolock in a golden coppy :D

     
    It's not like you'd ever get 1600 dust. If you only play Warlock, you'd probably disenchant any legendary you get regardless. All are worth 400 dust, so you'll only ever get 400 dust. You're just complaining that they're not giving you enough free dust.
    That just makes you sound like one of those entitled sweet 16 kids.
     
    "My mom is such a bitch. I wanted a Porche, but I got a Jag."
    Replace "My mom" with "Blizzard", "a Porche" with "1600 dust" and "Jag" with "free legendary", and that's what you sound like.
     
     LoL.. Where did i say that???? Please tell me...i was saying that i would be happier with 1600 dust not that i MUST get 1600 dust...i dont need that much but in the end it would be better. You dont think so? Or you are guy that will tell for shitt that is good if someone give it to you? Would you be happier with shitt or canddy?? That is my point here...i am telling that i WOULD BE HAPPIER (probably all player would be happier) with full dust of legy more then legy itself!! And i dont care about dust i have enough for my collection. But Dude, your comparison is so stupid... Cause i know you would be HAPPIER if you get Porche (if you like that care) over jag..but did i say i would be sad/angry if i get jag (400 dust)??? NO!!! So yes your comparison is really dumb....next time read commet 10 times if needed to understand what is someone saying...goooshhh
     
    Bad English?? Sorry!
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on Free Class Legendary. A Lose/Lose Situation?

    I agree with OP. Why? Here is my reason: first of all i play only warlock (wild) and have full golden warlock decks..i cant say its lose/lose its free 400 dust but gosh i would be happier with 1600 dust, not random legy, if i get warlock legy i will diss him and craft golden one (if he is good) so i dont care what legy i will get.... But with 1600 dust i could craft 1 golden epic or 2 golden rares or 4 golden commons xD i craft every card that can be used in renolock in a golden coppy :D

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.