• 1

    posted a message on Tirion + Deathwing is too strong!!!

    Yep, Savjz definitely is not one of best player. i would more believe streamers on rank 10k+ (and my own experience, where Deathwing is problem only in early game and with luck mid game. But almost useless late - something like AFK... he is just good to be in top 4 nothing more. I am more concerned about Alexstraza, which work like better AFK. And which is probably most mentioned by streamers over rank 10+ as too strong.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Worst legendary you have ever crafted?

    Leeroy Jenkins

    Just think about him, his stats are terrible. Nobody use him as anything else then +1mana cost fireball.

    (But i still hope he will go to HoF.)

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 3

    posted a message on Heroic Galakrond's Awakening Juggler Priest

    "Get me out of here." is my new nightmare. (Thx.)

    Posted in: Heroic Galakrond's Awakening Juggler Priest
  • 2

    posted a message on How hard is it to hit legend nowadays?
    Quote from Sevasmios >>
    Quote from elnur0000 >>

     That pic is of the first time I got legend, which I am admittedly proud of. I've been higher, but the first time I got it was the most special to me. Do you disagree with what I'm saying, or are you just salty bc you don't like what I have to say / you're mad bc you suck and can't get past rank 10? lol

    you don't have to be chosen one to hit legend dude, it's not that hard to get past through rank 10, neither rank 1. I have no idea why are you that delusional.  you paint it as very hard thing so it gives an excuse to your wasted time :)  my suggestion would be to get a life, and asap 

     So i guess in addition to being bad at HS, you're also bad at reading comprehension. I agree that rank 10 isn't difficult for someone who has some experience with HS; what I clearly suggested with my last comment was that you're stuck there bc (and I quote) "you suck". Legend is difficult to reach relative to any other rank, everyone who's gotten there knows this. That's how I know you've never been high rank, bc you keep trying to make it seem as if it's easy, probably bc you're frustrated with your incapability to play well and you want to believe that you're on the same level as the many people that are better than you. I am genuinely curious now to see what your rank is now tho, so by all means send me a message with your btag and I'll add you. I'm guessing no higher than rank 10 and probably rank 15-20 based on how salty and ignorant you are on this. Feel free to prove me wrong, lol

    Man, you should stop being je** (**=alous), Your argumentation is very invalid. You say he is presumptional and than you argument by presumption.

    Anyway to debate... For hitting legend, you really don't need any extraordinary skill, well you can even be pretty mediocre. Becose skill can be very easily switched with time effort. And this is the fact, which annoy most people (include me).

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on How hard is it to hit legend nowadays?
    Quote from Ashaman79 >>
    Quote from serotoninronin >>

    It's been said a million times before but I always find that it bears repeating, and I have to often remind myself about it, but it's basically a pure numbers game. Unless you're really struggling with a deck or making big mistakes in your play, it literally is just about the number of games you play. As someone said earlier, 51% will get you there, it'll just take about 300 games from rank 5, where allike a 63% winrate will get you there in about 75.

    Indeed. You really need time unless your winrate is pretty high.

    51% is not high enough.. You will gain you 2 stars every 100 games you play (51 wins, 49 losses), so to get 25 stars you will need to play 1250 games. That’s about 40 games per day for a month. So I would say 51% does not get you to legend.. ;)

    60% gives you 20 stars per 100 games, so you’ll still need to play 125 games, which is like 4 games per day in a month..

    Even when you would have 70% you’ll still need to play 2 games per day for a month...

    it depends on the time you have and the winrate...

     

     Thanks for math. Now i am sure i will never hit legend.:-( (As i play for 5 year and i don't think i ever hade more than 80 games per month, mostly even less.)

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Weekly Card Design Competition 10.20 - Discussion Topic
    Quote from Klipce >>

    I have a lot of artworks for Ysera since I'm working on an Emerald Dream inspired adventure so here comes the Green Queen !

    Upgraded versions :

    It's easy to upgrade her but you don't get much of a boost because her HP is very good. Maybe the last stage is a bit to powerful tho...

    Tokens :

    Ysera, Queen of Dreams works like Lord Jaraxxus. She is a Dragon for the purposes of tribe synergies.

    Dream Cards :

     Hope you'll like it. Tell me what you think !

     Oh, i like idea. But, overall it feels to strong, especialy if you consider enemy can't really play around of your hero card. Control decks without OTK just don't stand chance. But hard to tell if it is trully true. Just my feel.

      

    Quote from Blightcaller >>

    Upgraded versions:

    Also thought about other invoking cards, like:

     

     

     Pretty much balanced i really like it!

     

    Quote from Ashkrell >>

    Oh no I can't submit cos submission is not yet turned on. Let me put it here for now:

     

      

     

     

     

     I like your idea except one major and minor thing...

    For minor: Maybe you should consider some own token spell to be created as Razorpetal was everytime so weak to be played only in OTK decks and sometimes even there they wasn't. SO basicaly this hero power is worth it's cost, but invoke cards operate about 2 cost hero power... And it is time when this hero power start being weak even with deck build around. So maybe some new petal which deal 2 dmg would be better as 2 razorpetals for 2 mana looks like so much free value for me.

    And for lots of worse flaw in this creation: Don't use poisonous tag so freely. Poisonous is so strong and hard to balance tag that it is almost not used. And don't think you are really this much smarter to use it without issue. This one battlecry would just break game balance apart.

    Consider to change the battlecry to something different like first stage of upgrade to +1spell power and this turn your spells are free. Or something totaly different, i don't really want think about it. Just get rid of this poisonous dissaster.

     

    Posted in: Fan Creations
  • 2

    posted a message on Deck Digest v.2 - There Can Be Only One!

    Something like, survive until turn 6 without one card on start, without full usage of mana in 4 turns and hope in drawing one card in whole deck? Unique gameplane, definetly unique.

    Maybe MurlocHolmes should strop try making own deck and use some which already have some succes.

    Posted in: News
  • 4

    posted a message on Deck Digest v.2 - There Can Be Only One!

    WTF what is point of using Untapped potentional with only 3 choose one card... Terrible deck.

    Posted in: News
  • 2

    posted a message on Galakrond's Awakening Promotion Email - 2 New Cards!

    And on top lots of shaman spells have overload...

    But still, for control/big shaman it gives nice value... Especialy from cards like Hagatha's scheme and Earthquake. And even others spell which are played in control/big shaman are good with this one.

    I really believe, this card can very much improve winrate of those atchetypes. (Like Ancharrr.)

    Posted in: News
  • 1

    posted a message on Quest Priest is a problem - here's why
    Quote from Philopery >>

    It would seem like nobody has an answer for any of my arguments which honestly speaks in my favor.

    To the dude quoting winrates. I did actually see that but let me ask did you personally beat priest with face hunter? The winrate you quote are from rank 25 to legend and I have never beaten a quest priest with face hunter and another high rank friend of mine neither.

    Thus maybe it stands to reason that a good priest has an even more dominant match up vs face hunter.

    Don’t question my math bro, I have both studied and taught but switched to economics. Might be rusty but seriously doubt one with your language is much more capable than reading that percentage. Your are probably still saying stuff like “51% is a 5% higher winrate than 46 %” which is completely wrong.

    To the guy speaking of Warrior tears? Having no argument means you autolost the debate bro 😉 that is what people say rather than listen to argumentation and respond properly. I hold no love for warrior myself, only highlander hunter which is nowhere in high rank despite the tier 1 status according to hsreplay

     Facepalm. After this contribution i think there is no more reason to try telling you anything.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.